Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "R binary version with R_MEMORY_PROFILING"
2006 May 26
1
memory profiling
I'm interested in playing around with memory profiling in R-devel (as described
at http://developer.r-project.org/memory-profiling.html) and was trying to
figure out how to compile R-devel so that I can use the 'tracemem()' function.
But I can't figure out how/where to set R_MEMORY_PROFILING. Is it on the
configure command line?
Thanks for any help,
-roger
--
Roger D. Peng
2011 Aug 14
0
Improved version of Rprofmem
The Rprofmem facility is currently enabled only if the configuration
option --enable-memory-profiling is used. However, the overhead of
having it enabled is negligible when profiling is not actually being
done, and can easily be made even smaller. So I think it ought to be
enabled all the time.
I've attached a patch doing this, which also makes a number of other
improvements to Rprofmem,
2006 Dec 05
1
double precision
Hi,
I am attempting to query a data frame from a mysql database.
One of the variables is a unique identification number ("numeric") 18 digits
long.
I am struggling to retrieve this variable exactly without any rounding.
The function I am using is sqlQuery(), with an ODBC connection.
Querying directly results in the double being rounded towards the end (eg
6527600583317876352 instead of
2011 Jun 18
1
Vim-R-Plugin issue : Python interface must be enabled to run Vim-R-Plugin
I am trying to get the
Vim-R-Plugin<http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2628> to
work with gvim and R on Windows 7.
When I open a .R file in VIM, it complains and says ""Python interface must
be enabled to run Vim-R-Plugin." I have installed pywin32 for python 2.7,
and added the following 4 lines to my _vimrc per the instructions
2006 Jul 31
5
use tracemem to dump content in function read/write
Hi Expert
I want to use dtrace to monitor the content change of one file. I made following scripts,
#!/usr/sbin/dtrace -s
inline int MYPID = $1;
syscall::write:entry
/pid == MYPID/
{
tracemem(arg1, arg2);
printf("\n");
}
It always has an following error
bash-3.00$ sudo dumpFIFO.dtrace 3836
dtrace: failed to compile script ./dumpFIFO.dtrace: line 19: tracemem( ) argument #2
2016 Jun 04
1
RProfmem output format
I'm picking up this 5-year old thread.
1. About the four memory allocations without a stacktrace
I think the four memory allocations without a stacktrace reported by Rprofmem():
> Rprofmem(); x <- raw(2000); Rprofmem("")
> cat(readLines("Rprofmem.out", n=5, warn=FALSE), sep="\n")
192 :360 :360 :1064 :2040 :"raw"
are due to some
2019 Apr 29
1
[RFC-PATCH] Introducing virtio-example.
The main goal is to create an example to be used as template or
guideline for contributors when they wish to create a new virtio
device and to document "the right way" to do so.
It consists of several parts:
1. The device specification
* it can be found in the device header of the implementation
* it will hopefully be added to the official virtio specification
2010 Nov 23
1
Possibility for memory improvement: x <- as.vector(x) always(?) duplicates
Hi,
I've noticed that as.vector() always allocates a new object, e.g.
> x <- 1:10;
> x <- as.vector(x);
> tracemem(x);
[1] "<0x0000000005622db8"
> x <- as.vector(x);
tracemem[0x0000000005622db8 -> 0x0000000005622ec0]: as.vector
> x <- as.vector(x);
tracemem[0x0000000005622ec0 -> 0x0000000005622f18]: as.vector
> x <- as.vector(x);
2011 May 13
1
RProfmem output format
Hi all,
When I run the example in RProfmem, I get:
Rprofmem("Rprofmem.out", threshold=1000)
example(glm)
Rprofmem(NULL)
noquote(readLines("Rprofmem.out", n=5))
...
[1] 1384 :5416 :5416 :1064 :1064 :"readRDS" "index.search" "example"
[2] 1064 :"readRDS" "index.search" "example"
[3] 4712
2016 Apr 05
1
Assignment operator and deep copy for calling C functions
Hi All,
i have a problem in understanding what the assignment operator '<-' really is doing.
If i create two numeric arrays in R and copy one into the other with '<-' and
afterwards change one array by calling a C function, both arrays are changed!
The problem I am facing can easily be seen in the following example:
(The following R code and the C function is attached and
2010 Jul 29
1
precision of minus operation and if statments
Hi Everyone,
as part of a larger script, I need to insert the result of a simple minus
operation into an if statement.
I have noticed that the precision that appear on the screen is not the precision
in which R stores the result of the minus operation, and that this change alters
the result of the if statement. For example, when running this simple script:
> a=0.90
> b=0.95
>
2008 Feb 26
11
Is there way to trace memory in the dtrace ?
N_conreq:entry {
self->x=1;
calledaddr=(struct xaddrf *)arg3;
callingaddr=(struct xaddrf *)arg4;
trace(calledaddr->link_id);
tracemem(calledaddr->DTE_MAC.lsap_add, 80);
trace(callingaddr->link_id);
tracemem(callingaddr->DTE_MAC.lsap_add, 80);
}
0 -> N_conreq 255
2012 Jul 12
2
Understanding tracemem
Hi all,
I've been trying to get a better handle on what manipulations lead R
to duplicate a vector, creating small experiments and using tracemem
to observe what happens (all in 2.15.1). That's lead me to a few
questions, illustrated using the snippet below.
x <- 1:10
tracemem(x)
# [1] "<0x1058f8238>"
x[5] <- 5
# tracemem[0x1058f8238 -> 0x105994ab0]:
x[11] <-
2016 Aug 05
2
Extra copies of objects in environments when using $ operator?
My understanding is that R will not make copies of lists if there is
only one reference to the object. However, I've encountered a case
where R does make copies, even though (I think) there should be only
one reference to the object. I hope that someone could shed some light
on why this is happening.
I'll start with a simple example. Below, x is a list with one element,
and changing that
2012 Jun 06
2
suggest that as.double( something double ) not make a copy
I've been playing with passing arguments to .C(), and found that replacing
as.double(x)
with
if(is.double(x)) x else as.double(x)
saves time and avoids one copy, in the case that x is already double.
I suggest modifying as.double to avoid the extra copy and just
return x, when x is already double. Similarly for as.integer, etc.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2010 Sep 01
6
Why is vector assignment in R recreates the entire vector ?
Hello all,
A friend recently brought to my attention that vector assignment actually
recreates the entire vector on which the assignment is performed.
So for example, the code:
x[10]<- NA # The original call (short version)
Is really doing this:
x<- replace(x, list=10, values=NA) # The original call (long version)
# assigning a whole new vector to x
Which is actually doing this:
x<-
2012 Jan 17
1
names<- appears to copy 3 times?
Hi,
$ R --vanilla
R version 2.14.1 (2011-12-22)
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu (32-bit)
> DF = data.frame(a=1:3,b=4:6)
> DF
a b
1 1 4
2 2 5
3 3 6
> tracemem(DF)
[1] "<0x8898098>"
> names(DF)[2]="B"
tracemem[0x8898098 -> 0x8763e18]:
tracemem[0x8763e18 -> 0x8766be8]:
tracemem[0x8766be8 -> 0x8766b68]:
> DF
a B
1 1 4
2 2 5
3 3 6
>
Are those 3
2006 Jun 29
2
tracemem() not exactly what I had in mind
I was trying to use tracemem to look at mblk contents. First, I tried to use
mblk->b_wptr - mblk->b_rptr as the size, and was told that it had to be a
constant. Foo. (RFE #1).
Then, I tried to use 8 as the size, and kept getting decimal numbers printed.
Stumbled on #pragma D option rawbytes=true (is the =true necessary, btw?) and
that didn''t help.
Then, in desperation, I
2012 Apr 14
1
deep copy?
Is putting a variable into a list a deep copy (and is tracemem the
correct way to confirm)?
warmstrong at krypton:~/dvl/R.packages$ R
> x <- rnorm(1000)
> tracemem(x)
[1] "<0x3214c90>"
> x.list <- list(x.in.list=x)
tracemem[0x3214c90 -> 0x2af0a20]:
>
Is it possible to put a variable into a list without causing a deep
copy (i.e. if you _really_ want the
2020 Jan 09
6
Get memory address of an R data frame
Hello,
I would like for my C function to be able to manipulate some values stored in an R data frame.
To achieve this, a need the (real) memory address where the R data frame stores its data (hopefully in a contiguous way). Then, from R, I call the C function and passing this memory address as a parameter.
The question: how can we get the memory address of the R data frame?
Thank you!
L.