similar to: 'simulate.p.value' for goodness of fit

I seem to be able to use expected values that are decimal (e.g., 1.33) when using chisq.test but not when using fisher.test. This happens when using an array/matrix as input. Fisher.test returns: Error in sprintf(gettext(fmt, domain = domain), ...) : invalid format '%d'; use format %s for character objects. Thus, it appears fisher.test is looking for integers only. I tried putting the

Dear all, 1)how can I easily get p value for the coefficients of factors in a multinomial model? 2)why the p values for "type III" test with Anova are not identical to that from SAS? for example: A,B and C are categorical variables,but the proportions of each level in each categorical variables are not balance. Y is a nominal variables(>=3 categories); To do

Dear all: I have very small observed values and would like to do a goodness-of-fit test. Is there a multinomial exact goodness of fit test in R? Thank you very much! Sincerely, Jian --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I was hoping for some advice regarding possible explanations for the fitted probability values I obtained for a multinomial logistic regression. The analysis aims to predict whether Capgras delusions (present/absent) are associated with group (ABH, SV, homicide; values = 1,2,3,), controlling for previous violence. What has me puzzled is that for each combination the fitted probabilities are

Hi, I am trying to specify a multinomial logit model using the multinom function from the nnet package. Now I add another independent variable and it halves the AIC as given by summary(multinom()). But when I call Anova(multinom()) from the car package, it tells me that this added variable is insignificant (Pr(>Chisq)=0.39). Thus, the improved AIC suggests to keep the variable but the Anova

R Experts: I am conducting a meta-analysis where the effect measures to be pooled are simple proportions. For example, consider this data from Fleiss/Levin/Paik's Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2003, p189) on smokers: Study N Event P(Event) 1 86 83 0.965 2 93 90 0.968 3 136 129 0.949 4 82 70 0.854 Total

Hello everyone, I'd like to have suggestions about a common basic statistical approach, hope to be useful also for other R beginners. When you first get some data (i.e length of river) you may want to look at its distribution. Then you probably want to find which law follows this distribution, and to test the goodness of the fit. For doing this simple analysis I am writing some code

I'm trying to do a Hosmer-Lemeshow 'goodness of fit' test on my logistic regression model. I found some code here: http://sas-and-r.blogspot.com/2010/09/example-87-hosmer-and-lemeshow-goodness.html The R code is above is a little complicated for me but I'm having trouble with my answer: Hosmer-Lemeshow: p=0.6163585 le Cessie and Houwelingen test (Design library): p=0.2843620

Dear R Users, There exists a non-central hypergeometric distribution function in the (MCMCpack) package, and a hypergeometric distribution function in the (stats) package. Is there a function for sampling from an extended hypergeometric distribution? Thanks, Narcyz This message is intended for the addressee named and may con...{{dropped}}

Hi, I hope somebody can help me on how to use the hypergeometric function. I did read through the R documentation on hypergeometric but not really sure what it means. I would like to evaluate the hypergeometric function as follows: F((2*alpha+1)/2, (2*alpha+2)/2 , alpha+1/2, betasq/etasq). I'm not sure which function should be used- either phyper or qhyper or dhyper Where

I want to calculate chi square test of goodness of fit to test, Sample coming from Poisson distribution. please copy this script in R & run the script The R script is as follows ########################## start ######################################### No_of_Frouds<- c(4,1,6,9,9,10,2,4,8,2,3,0,1,2,3,1,3,4,5,4,4,4,9,5,4,3,11,8,12,3,10,0,7) N <- length(No_of_Frouds) # Estimation of

Dear All, I do apologise if this question is out of place for this list but I've tried searching mailing lists and read "Introductory Statistics with R" by Peter Dalgaard, but couldn't find any hints on solving my question below: I have a data frame (d) of values which I will rank in decreasing order of "val". Each value belongs to a group, either 'A',

It is not about "really arge total number of observations", but: set.seed(4711);tabs <- r2dtable(1e6, c(2, 2), c(2, 2)); A11 <- vapply(tabs, function(x) x[1, 1], numeric(1));table(A11) A11 0 1 2 166483 666853 166664 There are three possible matrices, and these come out in proportions 1:4:1, the one with all cells filled with ones being most common. Cheers, Jari

I am trying to perform goodness of fit test using R. I am using this website http://wiener.math.csi.cuny.edu/Statistics/R/simpleR/stat013.html for help. However, I am unable to carry out the test successfully. My code follows. It is taken from the website just mentioned. freq=c(22,21,22,27,22,36) # frequencies obtained after rolling the dice 150 times. prob=c(1,1,1,1,1,1)/6 # specify expected

I am trying to test goodness of fit for my legalistic regression using several options as shown below.  Hosmer-Lemeshow test (whose function I borrowed from a previous post), Hosmer–le Cessie omnibus lack of fit test (also borrowed from a previous post), Pearson chi-square test, and deviance test.  All the tests, except the deviance tests, produced p-values well above 0.05.  Would anyone please

Full_Name: Reginaldo Constantino Version: 2.8.0 OS: Ubuntu Hardy (32 bit, kernel 2.6.24) Submission from: (NULL) (189.61.88.2) For many tables, chisq.test with simulate.p.value=TRUE gives a p value that is obviously incorrect and inversely proportional to the number of replicates: > data(HairEyeColor) > x <- margin.table(HairEyeColor, c(1, 2)) >

Dear R-Users, How can I use chisq.test() as a goodness of fit test? Reading man-page I?ve some doubts that kind of test is available with this statement. Am I wrong? X2=sum((O-E)^2)/E) O=empirical frequencies E=expected freq. calculated with the model (such as normal distribution) See: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35f.htm for X2 used as a goodness of fit test. Any

Dear R Users, I employed the phyper() function to estimate the likelihood that the number of genes overlapping between 2 different lists of genes is due to chance. This appears to work appropriately. Now i want to try this with 3 lists of genes which phyper() does not appear to support. Some googling suggests i can utilize the Multivariate hypergeometric distribution to achieve this. eg.:

Hello, I have a question concerning the R-function chisq.test. For example, I have some count data which can be categorized as follows class1: 15 observations class2: 0 observations class3: 3 observations class4: 4 observations I would like to test the hypothesis whether the population probabilities are all equal (=> Test for discrete uniform distribution) If you have a small sample size

TOPIC My question regards the philosophy behind how R implements corrections to chi-square statistical tests. At least in recent versions (I'm using 2.13.1 (2011-07-08) on OSX 10.6.8.), the chisq.test function applies the Yates continuity correction for 2 by 2 contingency tables. But when used as a goodness of fit test (GoF, aka likelihood ratio test), chisq.test does not appear to implement