similar to: Anova for stratified Cox regression

This is a follow-up to a query that was posted regarding some problems that emerge when running anova analyses for cox models, posted by Mathias Gondan: Matthias Gondan wrote: >* Dear List,*>**>* I have tried a stratified Cox Regression, it is working fine, except for*>* the "Anova"-Tests:*>**>* Here the commands (should work out of the box):*>**>*

Hello everyone, I am a new user of R. Does anybody know how hazard ratios are extracted for each factor level in a stratified Cox proportional hazard regression model? I have a cancer data set where the variable ?differentiation? is a factor with three levels: poor, intermediate and good. I would like to extract the hazard ratio for each grade level and relate it to another prognostic factor.

>Hello, I am hoping for assistance in regards to examining the contribution of stratified variables in a cox regression. A previous post by Terry Therneau noted that "That is the point of a strata; you are declaring a variable to NOT be proportional hazards, and thus there is no single "hazard ratio" that describes it". Given this purpose of stratification, in the

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: n?o dispon?vel URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20080716/4aec957e/attachment.pl>

I?m trying to set up proportional hazard model that is stratified with respect to covariate 1 and has an interaction between covariate 1 and another variable, covariate 2. Both variables are categorical. In the following, I try to illustrate the two problems that I?ve encountered, using the lung dataset. The first problem is the warning: To me, it seems that there are too many dummies

Hello, I am new to R, and am having trouble getting the output I want from a stratified bootstrap. I didn't recieve a reply the first time I posted this question so I have tried to make it more clear. My data frame (denboot) is set up as follows: SITE cswa parea treat 1 BeanA 3 1.20 m 2 BeanBC 3 1.05 m 3 BeanD 1 0.93 m 4 BlackB 1 1.01

Hello All, Am having some trouble computing Type III SS in a Cox Regression using either drop1 or Anova from the car package. Am hoping that people will take a look to see if they can tell what's going on. Here is my R code: cox3grp <- subset(survData, Treatment %in% c("DC", "DA", "DO"), c("PTNO", "Treatment", "PFS_CENSORED",

Hello, I am analyzing the results of a survey of the student body on the use of certain technologies. The student body was divided in strata according to two criteria, college and user class. The resulting 24 strata were sampled. Subjects filled out a survey with a number of questions, most of them of the yes-no variety. I created a data.frame with the results for the survey. One row for

First, here is your message as it appears on R-help. On 10/14/2012 05:00 AM, r-help-request@r-project.org wrote: > I?m trying to set up proportional hazard model that is stratified with > respect to covariate 1 and has an interaction between covariate 1 and > another variable, covariate 2. Both variables are categorical. In the > following, I try to illustrate the two problems that

Hello R Experts, I kindly request your assistance on figuring out how to get a stratified random sampling proportional to 100. Below is my r code showing what I did and the error I'm getting with sampling::strata # FIRST I summarized count of records by the two variables I want to use as strata Library(RODBC) library(sqldf) library(sampling) #After establishing connection I query the data

Dear All, is there a stratified version of the Wilcoxon test (also known as van Elteren test) available in R? I could find it in the survdiff function of the survival package for censored data. I think, it should be possible to use this function creating a dummy censoring indicator and setting it to not censored, but may be there is a better way to perform the test. Thanks, Heinz T??chler

Rers: What is the preferred library/function for doing stratified random sampling from a dataset, given I want to control the number of samples (rather than the proportion of samples) per strata? Thanks! --j -- Jonathan A. Greenberg, PhD Postdoctoral Scholar Center for Spatial Technologies and Remote Sensing (CSTARS) University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue The Barn, Room

Given a set of data with a number of variables plus a response, I'd like to obtain a randomized subset of the rows such that the marginal proportions of each variable are maintained closely in the subset to that of the dataset, and possibly maintaining as well the two-factor interaction marginal proportions as well for some pairs. This must be a common problem in data mining, but I

Good afternoon, I am currently trying to do some work on survival analysis. - I hope to seek your advice re: 2 questions (1 general and 1 specific) (1) I'm trying to do a stratified Cox analysis and subsequently plot(survfit(object)). It seems to work for some strata, but not for others. I have tumor grade, which is a range of 1 - 4. When I divide this range of 1:4 into 2 groups, it

A recent question in r-help made me realize that I should add a drop1 method for coxph and survreg. The default does not handle strata() or cluster() properly. However, for coxph the right options for the "test" argument would be likelihood-ratio, score, and Wald; not chisq and F. All of them reference a chi-square distribution. My thought is use these arguments, and add an

I should hope that there is trouble, since "type III" is an undefined concept for a Cox model. Since SAS Inc fostered the cult of type III they have recently added it as an option for phreg, but I am not able to find any hints in the phreg documentation of what exactly they are doing when you invoke it. If you can unearth this information, then I will be happy to tell you whether

Hi all, I wish to do build discrete choice model to analyse habitat selection of wolverines. This can be done with a 'tricked' stratified Cox proportional hazard model. For each individual animal each selected position, and possible alternative non-used available positions are combined into strata. This means that one stratum contains a set of 1 used position and several positions which

Hi all, I am having the same issue that is described in an older thread here: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-February/213656.html The problem I am facing is that the machine accounts are not trusted in the domain (this is true for all Win 10 Systems). The issue with the computer is from my pov: Folgende herausgefilterte Gruppenrichtlinien werden nicht angewendet.

Hi there, I perform a stratified cox and then I need the strata as a  numeric array "straft.ln" ft.ln <- coxph(Surv(times,deaths)~ages+chemos+chemos:f1+chemos:f2+horms+horms:f1+horms:f2+grades+grades:f1+grades:f2+positives+positives:f1+positives:f2+sizes+sizes:f1+sizes:f2+strata(stra),data=ddd) basehazzft.ln=basehaz(ft.ln,centered=FALSE) H0ft.ln=c(basehazzft.ln[,1])

Hi, I was wondering why anova() and drop1() give different tail probabilities for F tests. I guess overdispersion is calculated differently in the following example, but why? Thanks for any advice, Tom For example: > x<-c(2,3,4,5,6) > y<-c(0,1,0,0,1) > b1<-glm(y~x,binomial) > b2<-glm(y~1,binomial) > drop1(b1,test="F") Single term deletions Model: y ~