similar to: Invoking R on BSD

Hi, I have been having problems installing the newest version on Linux (Ubuntu 9.10) (tried on two machines). The ./configure appears to work but I get the following error on the 'make' command. $ make make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. Below I'll post the contents of the configured folder. Any ideas what is causing the problem? Thanks, Rhett. rhett at

> x <- train[,c( 2:18, 20:21, 24, 27:31)] > y <- train$out > > svm.pr <- svm(x, y, probability = TRUE, method="C-classification", kernel="radial", cost=bestc, gamma=bestg, cross=10) > > pred <- predict(svm.pr, valid[,c( 2:18, 20:21, 24, 27:31)], decision.values = TRUE, probability = TRUE) > attr(pred, "decision.values")[1:4,]

Sometimes I find it useful to put C or Fortran sources under subdirs of "mypackage/src", especially to distinguish between my own files and e.g. lapack or blas sources. To get this working I would need a Makefile in my package which contains the appropriate dependencies to these sources in subdirs. But I don't want to add a complete Makefile, I want only a Makevars file containing

Dear R-help, I am trying to build R-1.5.1 on a Sun Blade 100 (sparc). It fails make check when var(1) returns NaN instead of NA. Using gcc-2.95.3 from sunfreeware.com, the build succeeds and passes make check I have: Solaris 8 gcc-3.1 (built on that machine from sources and installed in /usr/local/gcc-3.1 with binaries symlink'ed to /usr/local/bin) A synopsis is at the bottom of

Dear R-help, I am trying to build R-1.5.1 on a Sun Blade 100 (sparc). It fails make check when var(1) returns NaN instead of NA. Using gcc-2.95.3 from sunfreeware.com, the build succeeds and passes make check I have: Solaris 8 gcc-3.1 (built on that machine from sources and installed in /usr/local/gcc-3.1 with binaries symlink'ed to /usr/local/bin) A synopsis is at the bottom of

Hi, I installed the snow package on a unix box that has multiple cores. To be able to exploit the multiple cores (on one pc) do I still need to install the rmpi package (or rpvm). Another question, if i run a bayesian simulation on the multiple core after setting them up correctly (using snow), would you think there will be a noticeable speedup gain. Thanks, Saeed --- linux centos 4 dual core

I have a dataset of multiple variables and a response. For example, > str(x) 'data.frame': 3557238 obs. of 44 variables: $ response : Factor w/ 2 levels $ var2: Factor w/5000 levels If var2 for example is a factor with 5000 levels, what is the best approach to determine which of these levels is the most important to include in building the model, and which ones to discard.

If we use the ROCR package to find the accuracy of a classifier pred <- prediction(svm.pred, testset[,2]) perf.acc <- performance(pred,"acc") Do we?find the maximum accuracy?as follows?(is there a simplier way?): > max(perf.acc at x.values[[1]]) Then to find the cutoff point that maximizes the accuracy?do we do the following?(is there a simpler way): > cutoff.list <-

Hi further to my upgrade question thanks for pointing me in the right direction any ideas how I get round the following problem: I'm trying to install on a Tru64 alpha ecs1h[jps]69: make `Makedeps' is up to date. `libappl.a' is up to date. `Makedeps' is up to date. `libnmath.a' is up to date. `Makedeps' is up to date. `libunix.a' is up to date. `Makedeps' is up

Hi, I am studying using SVM functions of e1071 package to do prediction, and I found during the training data are "factor" type, then svm.predict() can predict data directly by categories; but if response variables are "numerical", the predicted value from svm will be continuous quantitative numbers, then how can I connect these quantitative numbers to categories? (for

I'm running a new install of 4.8-RELEASE on i386. Running "pkg_add -r gnome2", the following errors are reported: (I've defined the BATCH environment variable). Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.8-release/All/gdm2-2.4.1.3.tgz...Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "then") pkg_add: command 'if [ ! -f

I would like to know how to define the s extension when I have an incoming PRI line? Currently I have 5 incoming DID numbers. Four of these DID numbers I have going to specific extensions, the fifth number which is the main number I wish to go to a background sound where callers can hear message, get directory, dial extension, whatever. I see that the way to normally do this would be to

Shouldn''t pkg_add be using the -r option for package management? I worked around by forcing the client to use ports instead, but it stinks. Any thoughts? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

After installing a text-based development environment via /stand/sysinstall (followed by CVSup, makeworld/kernel etc to 4-8-stable), I realize I want to install KDE, too. I initiated this with: pkg_add -r kdebase followed again by CVSup etc. Apparently that wasn't enough. Am getting message "XFree86 setup utility.. not installed" when trying to config xf86config (text-based) via

Hi all, I''m running Puppet on FreeBSD and recently I started building my own packages. I would like to set the PKGROOT variable on all hosts so that packages are fetched from my server instead of freebsd.org. Is it possible to set this with puppet? I''ve read the suggestion on Trac [1], and it solves the problem when puppet is run with an rc script, but it won''t work

Hi all, I have update recently to freebsd 9.1 via freebsd-update and I was quite happy with the process and the instructions on freebsd-handbook, I think well documented. But I would like to understand what is the best practice to update the ports too as I used the package tools (pkg_add -r) to add few package to the base install. Keeping in mind my server have disk space constrain (small disk

Fresh install of 10.0 BETA3 #0 r257580 on amd64 using ZFS on root option, After install is complete Handbook install option launched from Final Configuration dialog fails with: Could not install package en-freebsd-doc (/usr/libexec/bsdinstall/docsinstall: pkg_add: not found) Network is available. /j

Hi, Has anyone had any success? After a clean install of OpenBSD, I do the following:- pkg_add ftp://rt.fm/pub/OpenBSD/3.5/packages/i386/gmake-3.80.tgz pkg_add ftp://rt.fm/pub/OpenBSD/3.5/packages/i386/bison-1.35p1.tgz pkg_add ftp://rt.fm/pub/OpenBSD/3.5/packages/i386/ruby-ncurses-0.8.tgz Then, I get (via CVS) the asterisk source.. cd /usr/src/asterisk /usr/local/bin/gmake clean

Hi, all, I just wanted to report that. I do not yet have a patch to suggest. nanobsd.sh cust_pkg() still tries to call pkg_add and fails when adding packages to the NANO_WORLD_DIR. tbz vs. txz ? Kind regards Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH * Kaiserallee 13a * 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100 info at punkt.de http://www.punkt.de Gf: J?rgen Egeling AG Mannheim 108285

Hi, I am running an environment with 15 FreeBSD servers on which I want to maintain ports, rc.conf settings, and assorted configuration in /usr/local/etc/. Looked around the existing Puppet docs, I got a puppetmaster and a test client to work and install a package as specified in the site manifest. This is very basic but awesome! I want to create a puppet FreeBSD HowTo that addresses a