similar to: GAM, GLM, Logit, infinite or missing values in 'x'

Hello, I understand that question is probably stupid, but ... I have data (polity IV index) "country","year","democ","autoc","polity","polity2" "1","Afghanistan ",1800,1,7,-6,-6 "2","Afghanistan ",1801,1,7,-6,-6 "3","Afghanistan

Hi, I'm getting an error message using polr(): Error in optim(start, fmin, gmin, method = "BFGS", hessian = Hess, ...) : initial value in 'vmmin' is not finite The outcome variable is ordinal and factored, and the independant variable is continuous. I've checked the source code for both polr() and optim() and can't find any variable called

Hello, I was trying to fit a generalized logistic curve and my code for testing if the function "nls" is working is like this ####### #define the generalized logistic curve function glogit=function(a, b, c, m, t, x) { tmp = 1/(1 + t * exp(-b * (x - m)))^(1/t) model.func = a + tmp * c #define the gradient vector Z = cbind(1, c*(x-m)*tmp^(t+1)*exp(-b*(x-m)), tmp, -c*b*exp(-b*(x-m))

Hi, I am struggling with using R CMD BATCH command. Kindly suggest solution to the following problem. I have a function named CinC with accept two input parameters. This can be shown as: CinC <- function(start, end) where start and end both are character strings. Please suggest me how can I run this function using command R CMD BATCH. Currently I am trying to do like this -> R CMD

my network: local pc(192.168.1.2)-->openwrt_adsl_router A( 192.168.1.1/24&11.22.33.44pppoe&10.10.10.1/24 tinc)<---remote B: 10.10.20.1/24 ^ | remote C:10.10.0.1/24 all running tinc 1.0.x, ADSL router

yes, I have these in C host file: Subnet=10.10.0.0/24 Subnet=0.0.0.0/1 Subnet=128.0.0.0/1 ## not metioned, because I think is maybe works in same as 0.0.0.0/1 B host file doesn't have 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.0/1 I only added one route to 5.6.7.8 via B, not via C On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Maxim Vorontsov <6012030 at gmail.com> wrote: > hi. > > Are you add only

hi. Are you add only 0.0.0.0/1 as route, not 128.0.0.0/1 too? Did you tried to add route to 5.6.7.8 via C with lesser metric then via B? If you have to add static routes only on a few servers, you can add them to the $HOST-up scripts. On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Zhang Jun <gb2313 at gmail.com> wrote: > my network: > > local pc(192.168.1.2)-->openwrt_adsl_router A(

All, If we can speculatively execute a load instruction, why isn’t it safe to hoist it out by promoting it to a scalar in LICM pass? There is a comment in LICM pass that if a load/store is conditional then it is not safe because it would break the LLVM concurrency model (See commit 73bfa4a). It has an IR test for checking this in test/Transforms/LICM/scalar-promote-memmodel.ll However, I have

I think gcc is right. It inserted a branch for n == 0 (the cbz at the top), so that's not a problem. In all other regards, this is safe: if you examine the sequence of loads and stores, it eliminated all but the first load and all but the last store. How's that unsafe? If I had to guess, the bug here is that LLVM doesn't want to hoist the load over the condition (which it is right

Thanks for the background on the concurrent memory model. So, is it sufficient that the loop entry is guarded by condition (cbz at top) for preventing the race? The loop entry will be guarded by condition if loop has been rotated by loop rotate pass. Since LICM runs after loop rotate, we can use ScalarEvolution::isLoopEntryGuardedByCond to check if we can speculatively execute load without