Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "tukeyHSD"
2008 Sep 30
2
plot inside graphic area
I am trying to plot a small graphic inside the graphic area of a bigger
graphic. Does anybody know the commend for that?
Thanks a lot!
--
MSc José Alberto F. Monteiro
Botanisches Institut
Universität Basel
السلام عليكم
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2008 May 28
2
Tukey HSD (or other post hoc tests) following repeated measures ANOVA
Hi everyone,
I am fairly new to R, and I am aware that others have had this
problem before, but I have failed to solve the problem from previous
replies I found in the archives.
As this is such a standard procedure in psychological science, there
must be an elegant solution to this...I think.
I would much appreciate a solution that even I could understand... ;-)
Now, I want to calculate a
2014 Dec 20
2
Unexplained difference between results of dppsv and dpotri LAPACK routines
Dear R contributors,
Considering the following sample C code, that illustrates two possible
uses of a Cholesky decomp for inverting a matrix, equally valid at
least in theory:
SEXP test() {
int d = 2;
int info = 0;
double mat[4] = {2.5, 0.4, 0.4, 1.7};
double id[4] = {1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0};
double lmat[3];
F77_CALL(dpotrf)("L", &d, mat, &d, &info);
lmat[0] = mat[0];
lmat[1]
2007 Nov 15
2
font formating
I am tryindo to do a very simple thing but cannont find how to do it
anywhere. I need to formap part of my title as subscript ans superscript.
How can I do it?
Thanks a lot in advance
José
--
MSc José Alberto F. Monteiro
Botanisches Institut
Universität Basel
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2004 Dec 04
1
Wishlist: heatmap/image legend (PR#7402)
Full_Name: Elizabeth Purdom
Version: 1.9.1
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (171.64.102.199)
It would be great if heatmap and/or image had the option of printing a legend
bar on it somewhere that would indicate the ranges given by the colors in the
heatmap (i.e. a very small image rectangle with the same colors as in the
heatmap). Because heatmap is using layout, it seems pretty
2013 Jan 13
2
getting TukeyHSD code
Hello R People:
Here's the Saturday night goofy question. I would like to see the
code for TukeyHSD function and I tried the following:
> getAnywhere("TukeyHSD")
A single object matching ?TukeyHSD? was found
It was found in the following places
package:stats
namespace:stats
with value
function (x, which, ordered = FALSE, conf.level = 0.95, ...)
2009 Oct 20
1
TukeyHSD no longer working with aov output?
I can prove I've done this before, but I recently installed Rexcel (and it
was easiest to reinstall R and some other bits to make it work) and now its
no longer working.
Before I would do an ANOVA and a tukey post-hoc like this:
>data1.aov=aov(result~factor1*factor2, data=data1)
then...
>TukeyHSD(summary(data1.aov))
and it would give me a nice tukey table of all the pairwise
2003 Aug 13
1
anova and tukeyHSD
I would like to do a one way anova and then a tukeyHSD. I have three vectors
A,B and C. In a previous help message, I was told to do the following for
the anova:
y = c(A,B,C)
group = factor(rep(a:3,c(7,9,13))) #provided there a 7 elements in A,9 in B
and 13 in C
and then
anova(lm(y~group))
Looking at the tukeyHSD method it looks like it wants the aov method which I
don't understand.
2010 Feb 26
2
TukeyHSD troubles
I've tried to run a Tukey post-hoc but keep getting this weird error,
whether the aov was significant or not. treat_code is a dummy
variable, but that shouldn't matter. Any suggestions?
Thanks
Amy
> summary(aov(EtoH~treat_code, mydata))
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
treat_code 1 16.44 16.44 11.027 0.001014 **
Residuals 287 427.91 1.49
---
Signif.
2012 Jan 02
1
Is using glht with "Tukey" for lme post-hoc comparisons an appropriate substitute to TukeyHSD?
Hello,
I am trying to determine the most appropriate way to run post-hoc
comparisons on my lme model. I had originally planned to use Tukey
HSD method as I am interested in all possible comparisons between my
treatment levels. TukeyHSD, however, does not work with lme. The
only other code that I was able to find, and which also seems to be
widely used, is glht specified with Tukey:
2007 Jun 28
2
TukeyHSD
Hello everyone,
So I ran an anova with aov and then I want to run post-hoc comparisons but
keep receiving this message :
> no applicable method for "TukeyHSD"
Here is my code:
> d<-read.table("d.txt")
> d
> Obs subj Hand Gaze RT
> 1 1 s1 1 1 401.4
> 2 2 s2 1 1 363.3......
> summary(ano <-
2012 Oct 23
1
How Rcmdr or na.exclude blocks TukeyHSD
Dear R-Helpers,
I was calling the TukeyHSD function and not getting confidence intervals or p-values. It turns out this was caused by missing data and the fact that I had previously turned on R Commander (Rcmdr). John Fox knew that Rcmdr sets na.action to na.exclude, which causes the problem. If you have this problem, you can either exit Rcmdr before calling TukeyHSD or you can set na.action to
2006 Feb 08
1
ERROR: no applicable method for "TukeyHSD"
Why do I see this error?
> library(stats)
> require(stats)
[1] TRUE
>
> tHSD <- TukeyHSD(aov)
Error in TukeyHSD(aov) : no applicable method for "TukeyHSD"
In case it helps:
> aov
Call:
aov(formula = roi ~ (Cue * Hemisphere) + Error(Subject/(Cue *
Hemisphere)), data = roiDataframe)
Grand Mean: 8.195069
Stratum 1: Subject
Terms:
Residuals
Sum
2012 Jul 20
4
TukeyHSD not working
Dear r-help members.
I would like to compare species numbers of moths between eight different forests (each sampled for six nights). I would like to do a nested anova to compare species numbers between forests and nights.
For more site specific details I wanted to do a Tukey test (TukeyHSD). Unfortunately this test is not working (message: "nicht anwendbare Methode f?r 'TukeyHSD' auf
2006 Aug 01
1
plot() with TukeyHSD
Hello,
When plotting the results of a TukeyHSD multiple comparisons
procedure with an ANOVA (lm) object, an extra line appears
in the confidence intervals that contain 0. For example (this
is straight from the TukeyHSD helpfile):
> summary(fm1 <- aov(breaks ~ wool + tension, data = warpbreaks))
> TukeyHSD(fm1, "tension", ordered = TRUE)
> plot(TukeyHSD(fm1,
2010 Mar 25
1
Expected pairwise.student.t and TukeyHSD behavior?
pairwise.t.test is returning NAs when one of the samples only has one entry, while TukeyHSD returns results (maybe not trustworthy or believable, but results).
I stumbled on this because I did not realize one of my samples only had one entry while most of the others had several hundred, so I realize this is not a desirable situation. I'm really just curious about the difference between how
2005 Aug 15
1
error in predict glm (new levels cause problems)
Dear R-helpers,
I try to perform glm's with negative binomial distributed data.
So I use the MASS library and the commands:
model_1 = glm.nb(response ~ y1 + y2 + ...+ yi, data = data.frame)
and
predict(model_1, newdata = data.frame)
So far, I think everything should be ok.
But when I want to perform a glm with a subset of the data,
I run into an error message as soon as I want to predict
2002 Aug 16
2
system command
Hello,
It is very simple question. I want to go to the parent directory and
give the 'system("cd ../") commnad. But it stayes at the same dirctory
as before. Do I forget to give some extra parameter to system command in
this case?
Regards,
Nader
--------------------------------------------------------------
Zie ook/see also: http://www.knmi.nl/maildisclaimer.html
2010 Dec 14
1
postscript failure manifests in plot.TukeyHSD
Hello R Developers,
Dear R-developers,
I ran some standard tests with currently (today morning) compiled R release
candidate in Linux R 2.12.1 RC (2010-12-13 r53843). Some of these tests used
plot.TukeyHSD function. This worked OK on the screen (X11 device), but
PostScript file could not be rendered. The following example had the problem
with me:
postscript(file="tukeyplot.ps")
2010 Oct 22
2
visualize TukeyHSD results
I am a new R user but a long time SAS user. I searched for a response to this question but no luck, so forgive me if this topic has been covered before. I am running a TukeyHSD post hoc test after running an ANOVA. I get the results of all pairwise comparisons, no problem. However, the output table is a little "busy", and I'd like to make the output easier to read. Specifically, I