similar to: GLM results different from GAM results without smoothing terms

hi, i'm using gam() function from package mgcv with default option (edf estimated by GCV). >G=gam(y ~ s(x0, k = 5) + s(x1) + s(x2, k = 3)) >SG=summary(G) Formula: y ~ +s(x0, k = 5) + s(x1) + s(x2, k = 3) Parametric coefficients: Estimate std. err. t ratio Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 3.462e+07 1.965e+05 176.2 < 2.22e-16 Approximate significance of smooth

All: I am trying to use gam in a scatterplot smoothing problem. The data being smoothed have greater 1000 observation and have multiple "humps". I can smooth the data fine using a function something like: out <- ksmooth(x,y,"normal",bandwidth=0.25) plot(x,out$y,type="l") The problem is when I try to fit the same data using gam out <-

dear all, i have a little question, but it make me torment long time hope you can help me and give some advices , thanks i use smoothing spline in package gam the model > m1=gam(y~ost+wst+park10+sch50+comm+build+suite+y05+y06+y07+y99+y98+s(builarea)+s(age)+s(fl)+s(totfl)+s(cbd)+s(redl)) and summary(m1) can show the "s"(smoothing) variables' Signif. codes.

Hi, all, Does anyone know how to get the functional form of the smooth terms in GAM? eg. I fit y=a+b*s(x) where s is the smooth function. After fitting this model with GAM in R, I want to know the form of the s(x). Any suggestion is appreciated. Thanks, Jin --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?

I am a little bit confusing about the following help message on how to fit a GAM model with interaction between factor and smooth terms from http://rss.acs.unt.edu/Rdoc/library/mgcv/html/gam.models.html: ?Sometimes models of the form: E(y)=b0+f(x)z need to be estimated (where f is a smooth function, as usual.) The appropriate formula is: y~z+s(x,by=z) - the by argument ensures that the smooth

Hi, there, I have 5 datasets. I would like to choose a basis spline with same knots in GAM function in order to obtain same basis function for 5 datasets. Moreover, the basis spline is used to for an interaction of two covarites. I used "cr" in one covariate, but it can only smooth w.r.t 1 covariate. Can anyone give me some suggestion about how to choose a proper smoothing spline

I am new to R. I'm using the function GAM and wanted to get standard errors and p-values for the parametric terms (I fitted a semi-parametric models). Using the function anova() on the object from GAM, I only get p-values for the nonparametric terms. Does anyone know if and how to get standard errors for the parametric terms? Thanks. Jean G. Orelien

I have contributed a "gam" library to CRAN, which implements "Generalized Additive Models". This implementation follows closely the description in the GAM chapter 7 of the "white" book "Statistical Models in S" (Chambers & Hastie (eds), 1992, Wadsworth), as well as the philosophy in "Generalized Additive Models" (Hastie & Tibshirani 1990,

I have contributed a "gam" library to CRAN, which implements "Generalized Additive Models". This implementation follows closely the description in the GAM chapter 7 of the "white" book "Statistical Models in S" (Chambers & Hastie (eds), 1992, Wadsworth), as well as the philosophy in "Generalized Additive Models" (Hastie & Tibshirani 1990,

Qusetion #1 ********* Model selection in GAM can be done by using: 1. step.gam {gam} : A directional stepwise search 2. gam {mgcv} : Smoothness estimation using GCV or UBRE/AIC criterion Suppose my model starts with a additive model (linear part + spline part). Using gam() {mgcv} i got estimated degrees of freedom(edf) for the smoothing splines. Now I want to use the functional form of my model

Hello, I have a question regarding model selection and dropping of terms for GAMs fitted with package mgcv. I am following the approach suggested in Wood (2001), Wood and Augustin (2002). I fitted a saturated model, and I find from the plots that for two of the covariates, 1. The confidence interval includes 0 almost everywhere 2. The degrees of freedom are NOT close to 1 3. The partial

Hello fellow R's, I do apologize if this is a basic question. I'm doing some GAMs using the mgcv package, and I am wondering what is the most appropriate way to determine how much of the variability in the dependent variable is explained by each term in the model. The information provided by summary.gam() relates to the significance of each term (F, p-value) and to the

Dear All, Anyone know if there is a package that fits Generalized Linear Models(GAM) to data with ordered dependent variable(response) ? Simon Wood's mgcv has probit, logit,... other links, however, I could not find a way to do GAM *ordered *probit. Yee's VGAM claims to fit ordinal proportional odds model(cumulative logit model) (see: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~yee/VGAM/) but I

Hello everyone. I am doing a logistic gam (package mgcv) on a pretty large dataframe (130.000 cases with 100 variables). Because of that, the gam is fitted on a random subset of 10000. Now when I want to predict the values for the rest of the data, I get the following error: > gam.basis_alleakti.1.pr=predict(gam.basis_alleakti.1, +

I'm beginner in R! I have a lot of problems on R..... I have three questions about GAM 1. What is the function of Gaussian distribution in GAM?(if I choose family is Gaussian) Is it used in the predictand value (Y)? 2. How to plot a graph the gam function? For example: y<-gam(a~s(b),family=gaussian (link=log) ,Data) how to plot x axis is s(b) and y axis is log a??? 3. if I use GAM to

Hi all, I try to interpolate a data set in the form: time Erg 0.000000 48.650000 1.500000 56.080000 3.000000 38.330000 4.500000 49.650000 6.000000 61.390000 7.500000 51.250000 9.000000 50.450000 10.500000 55.110000 12.000000 61.120000 18.000000 61.260000 24.000000 62.670000 36.000000 63.670000 48.000000 74.880000 I want to get smoothed splines by using the class gam The first way I tried , was

Dear R users, I'm new to both R and to this list and would like to get advice on how to build generalized additive models in R. Based on the description of gam, which I found on the R website, I specified the following model: model1<-gam(ST~s(MOWST1),family=binomial,data=strikes.S), in which ST is my binary response variable and MOWST1 is a categorical independent variable. I get the

Dear R users, I read your methods of extracting the variance explained by each predictor in different places. My question is: using the method you suggested, the sum of the deviance explained by all terms is not equal to the deviance explained by the full model. Could you tell me what caused such problem? > set.seed(0) > n<-400 > x1 <- runif(n, 0, 1) > ## to see problem

In Dr. Wood's book on GAM, he suggests in section 4.1.6 that it might be useful to shrink a single smooth by adding S=S+epsilon*I to the penalty matrix S. The context was the need to be able to shrink the term to zero if appropriate. I'd like to do this in order to shrink the coefficients towards zero (irrespective of the penalty for "wiggliness") - but not necessarily all the

Dear all, I'm trying to fit a pure additive model of the following formula : fit <- gam(y~x1+te(x2, x3, bs="cr")) ,with the smoothing parameter estimation method "magic"(default). Regarding this, I have two questions : Question 1 : In some cases the value of "mgcv.conv$fully.converged" becomes "FALSE", which tells me that the method stopped with a