similar to: INSTALL.in: Install R to local path?

> version _ platform x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu arch x86_64 os linux-gnu system x86_64, linux-gnu status major 2 minor 2.1 year 2005 month 12 day 20 svn rev

Hi, I'm trying to cross compile R260 in a ubuntu 6.06 linux. I downloaded the Makefile for 251 and simply replaced the R version by 260. However I'm getting an error about mingw. ernesto at gandalf:~/ipimar/devel/R/ccompile260$ make R export

I have ran across a case where the function isIdenticalTo is return true for instructions that are not equivalent. The instructions in question are load/store instructions, and is causing a problem with MachineBranchFolding. The problem is this, I have two branches of a switch statement that are identical, except for the size of the store. Here is some cut-down LLVM-IR to showcase the issue:

Hello, I can nolonger build R packages in R 2.6.0 (win xp). I get the error message 'sh' is not recognized as an internal or external command. In earlier versions of R I had no problems. Maybe that someone can help me with this. Jean-Paul Fox. C:\PROGRA~1\R\R-2.6.0\bin>Rcmd build --force --binary C:\Temp\R260\mlirt * checking for file

Hello Does anybody happen to know if it is possible to use the survey package to estimate a covariance matrix from a complex survey? I have design weights and clusters (no strata), and want to get a covariance matrix with preferably the effective sample size or else an estimate of the variance-covariance matrix of the covariance matrix ("asymptotic covariance matrix"). Is this

I looked for evidence that this is supposed to happen, as it was news to me that it did on some versions of R. Possible sources of documentation seem to be R CMD INSTALL --help ?INSTALL R-intro.texi, R-exts.texi, R-admin.texi none of which mention this AFAICS, and all seem to be written assuming an existing library tree. DId you find something to suggest otherwise? Clearly no alpha/beta

On Jan 4, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > I have ran across a case where the function isIdenticalTo is return true for instructions that are not equivalent. The instructions in question are load/store instructions, and is causing a problem with MachineBranchFolding. The problem is this, I have two branches of a switch statement that are identical, except for the size of the store.

I'm building on cygwin. But the procedure for building the front-end on Cygwin is a bit daunting, to say the least,. Does anyone know a source for a pre-built version of the same?

I can't reproduce these on GNU-Linux/x86. What platform are you on? Reid. On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 16:50 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > AFAICT these are valid errors. > > Getting an error on the 'make install' for LLVM :- > > > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/build/llvm/tools/llvm-ar' > llvm[2]: Installing Debug /usr/llvm/bin/llvm-ar > /usr/bin/install:

I maintain the Devore5 package which contains the data sets from the 5th edition of Jay Devore's text "Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences". The 6th edition has now been published and it includes several new data sets in exercises and examples. In addition, some exercises and examples from the 5th edition are renumbered in the 6th edition. I face the

>From: "Robin Davies" <rerdavies at rogers.com> > >I'm building on cygwin. But the procedure for building the front-end on >Cygwin is a bit daunting, to say the least,. > >Does anyone know a source for a pre-built version of the same? > To my knowledge there is no pre-built version of the cfe. However, if you like I can give you the build instructions.

AFAICT these are valid errors. Getting an error on the 'make install' for LLVM :- make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/build/llvm/tools/llvm-ar' llvm[2]: Installing Debug /usr/llvm/bin/llvm-ar /usr/bin/install: target `/usr/llvm/bin/llvm-ar' is not a directory make[2]: *** [/usr/llvm/bin/llvm-ar] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/build/llvm/tools/llvm-ar' make[1]: ***

I've been involved in a thread over on the fedora-devel mailing list about the experimental MIT Kerberos 5 compatibility for Samba. I'm staring at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/MIT_Build , and the list of incompatibilities is daunting. Is anyone over here doing the compatibility work and can comment on progress? Or, perhaps, is this just fundamentally unworkable? The experimental

Hello: Could anyone point me to a nice example where someone has created methods for "[" on a user defined Class? I looked at the package Matrix but that was a little daunting. I'm looking for someone a little more introductory. I've tried to search the help section and the web but its difficult since "[" isn't searchable. Thanks in advance! Greg [[alternative

Hello Anna, I've been looking into compiling a list of all of the false positives in the current Capture Tracking Analysis, but I'm having a bit of trouble getting my head around it all. I feel like I understand it at a theoretical level but jumping into the implementation is quite daunting. I would appreciate any advice you could give to point me in the right direction. Many thanks,

On 27 April 2010 17:28, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > The compiler integrates into a comprehensive programming environment. > It has to know what the environment provides and uses.  That _is_ very much > the compiler's responsibility. I agree the compilers should know about threads, but enough to work around the issues and not start creating threads the user

I want to create a clean .rpm package for R built with MKL and ICC. I follow Fedora instrcutions[0] to create the package. As a base, I use the R-3.2.2.src.rpm. I am left with this error: ------------------------------------------ installing R info pages ... updating '/usr/share/info/dir' ... make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD/R-3.2.2/doc/manual' + mv

David A. Green wrote: > I find llvm-commits daunting. So much that I hesitate to do reviews. > As Chris commented, I am not very active on that list. There's a reason > for that beyond lack of time. So the goal is to make it easier for a member of the community to review only commits to a sub-tree that interests them? Let's say it may or may not be easier for reviewers to

Now I believe that I am getting the same error as I was getting last time I tried to build llvm-gcc. It may possibly be my Cygwin instillation but am not sure. makeinfo --split-size=5000000 -I ../../../src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc -I ../../../src/ llvm-gcc/gcc/doc/include \ -o ../../../src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc/cpp.info ../../../src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc/cpp.texi ' in

I built R form source succesfully on my Fedora 22 box. No errors. I can read there is an issue with some manuals at build time when running makeinfo, especially these two: doc/manual/R-exts.texi cp doc/manual/R-intro.texi Some distro have hacks about makeinfo 5 in their build script. I wonder if some manuals are broken but couldn't see it when running make. May someone tells me more about