similar to: rounding format

Hi I am using xyplot() to plot on the log scale by using scale=list(log=T) argument. For example: xyplot(1:10~1:10, scales=list(log=T)) But the axis labels are printed as scientific notation (10^0.0, etc), instead of fixed notation. How can I change that to fixed notation? options(scipen=4) doesn't work on xyplot() Thanks John

Hi, I have a simple plot by plot(x,y, log='xy'). However, due to the large range of values of x, the x-axis annotation is printed as "2e+02 1e+03 5e+03 2e+04 1e+05" instead of "200 1000 5000 20000 100000". How can I make it printed as in the later one? Thanks John

Dear all, Is there anybody who can help me to avoid scientific number in the summary of an lm model? Here there is an example of a usual output of the lm model. Thank you! Guillermo Example summary(lm(promiscuity.Index~allK)) Call: lm(formula = promiscuity.Index ~ allK) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -1.67094 -0.13126 0.06703 0.19913 0.40673 Coefficients:

R developers, Seems I get a bad result ("%#4.0-1e" in particular) when trying to use prettyNum digits=0 with scientific notation. I tried on both my Linux box and on an online R evaluator and saw the same problem, so it's not limited to my box at least. I see the problem in both R 3.5.3 and R 3.3.2. options(scipen=-100) prettyNum(1, digits=0) [1] "%#4.0-1e" prettyNum(2,

Dear List, I will appreciate any advice regarding how to convert the following numbers [I got in return by taxondive()] in numeric integers without the e.g. 6.4836e+01 abbreviations. Thank you very much in advance, Gian > taxa_dive Species Delta Delta* Lambda+ Delta+ S Delta+ Nat1 5.0000e+00 6.4836e+01 9.5412e+01 6.7753e+02 8.7398e+01 436.99 Nat2

Dear R users: I assigned students to make some graphs and I'm having trouble answering some questions that they have. We are all working on R 2.1 on Fedora Core Linux 4 systems. 1. In the plot, the axis is not labeled by "numbers", but rather scientific notation like "-2e+08" or such. We realize that means -200,000,000. We want to beautify the plot. We would rather

Dear all, I am using the bigglm package to fit a few GLM's to a large dataset (3 million rows, 6 columns). While trying to fit a Poisson GLM I noticed that the coefficient estimates were very different from what I obtained when estimating the model on a smaller dataset using glm(), I wrote a very basic toy example to compare the results of bigglm() against a glm() call. Consider the

Hello, A small problem I can't solve > p <- 0.0001 > p [1] 1e-04 How can I force the printout of p to 0.0001? I have tried 'format', 'round', 'signif', 'print' in different combinations without success. Fredrik Lundgren

R gurus, Every so often(*) someone asks how to suppress scientific notation in printing, so I thought I'd give it a shot, but I need some help. The formatting decision is made(**) on line 286 of src/main/format.c : if (mF <= *m) { /* IFF it needs less space : "F" (Fixpoint) format */ where mF is the number of characters for "normal" printing and *m is the number

While implementing R's new 'altrep' functionality in the TERR engine, I discovered a bug in R's 'deferred_string' altrep object: it is not using the correct value of the 'OutDec' option when it expands a deferred_string. See the following example: R 3.5.1: (same results in R 3.6.0 devel engine built 10/5) > options(scipen=0, OutDec=".") >

Dear All, I'm trying to plot a histogram (with the relative frequencies as the Y axis), But the scale of the y axis is given by 0e+00, 1e-04, 2e-04, 3e-04,......... Now, I have 2 questions 1- Does (1e-04=0.01831563)? 2- If this true,how can i change the given scale to (0.01,0.03,0.05,0.07,0.09)? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi A very simple question on number formats. After some calculations, some variables I have come out looking like this: -1.892972e+00 Now apart from the fact that the "e+00" is completely redundant, I would rather have the number represented without the e bit. I want to export data like this to a text file and would rather have: -1.892972 than -1.892972e+00 I have tried

This mailing list truly is amazing. Thank you so much for all the help! I feel a little strange asking something that "simple" again, but I wasn't able to find it in the help... Is there a way to tell R how to display numbers (double)? How many numbers after the decimal point, etc... Thanks again, folks and have a nice New Years Eve! Dax

On 05/11/2016 12:35 PM, Amit Ashara wrote: > I ran the opusenc.exe on a wave file and checked the OpusTag section. My > concern is on Total Segment Size being >> than the actual data being > put. Is this just an example of implementation or does a size of 764 > BYTES kept as a place holder for putting more data? Yes, opusenc does reserve some space in the header so that tags can

On 02/02/2010 6:20 AM, Dimitri Shvorob wrote: > Ruben Roa has kindly suggested using 'scipen' option - cf. > >> fixed notation will be preferred unless it is more than ???scipen??? digits >> wider. > > However, > > options(scipen = 50) > x = c(1e7, 2e7) > barplot(x) > > still does not produce the desired result. This is strange. I see what

Hello, I am having a dataset in which the values range from 0 - 700000. When I tried to plot a scatterplot using following command plot(x,y) I got the plot where the x-axis and y-axis were displayed as 0e+00, 1e+05, 2e+05, ....... I saw the dataset, but there is no erroneous value. Can anybody guide me on this? Thanks, Shreyasee [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi Amit, I'm not sure what you're trying to ask, but the reserved space in the header is an optional thing. Encoders are free to do it, but are not required to do so. Jean-Marc On 05/11/2016 01:32 PM, Amit Ashara wrote: > Hello Jean-Marc, > > So for the moment we can assume that this method is also OK to use? > > On Embedded Systems, both SRAM and Flash can be a

>>> Amit Ashara <ashara.amit at gmail.com> schrieb am 11.05.2016 um 19:32 in Nachricht <CAEyg9sjvTWMBMMCJ8HQcYmbv1BtNt54CgpqWaGNm02MWrKcxaQ at mail.gmail.com>: > Hello Jean-Marc, > > So for the moment we can assume that this method is also OK to use? > > On Embedded Systems, both SRAM and Flash can be a restricting factor > besides the compute time. To

I need to report exact p-values in my dissertation. Looking at my lm() results of many regressions with huge datasets I have the feeling that p-values are rounded to the smallest value of "2e-16", because this p-value is very common. Is that true or just chance? If it is true, how do I obtain the "true" unrounded p-values for these regressors? m1 <- lm(y ~ x1+x2+x3+4+x5,

Hi, The format problem is really annoying. How to get rid of it? x [1] 1e+06 And also when I do barplot, x=rnorm(100,mean=1000) barplot(table(cut(x,breaks=c(0,50,100,150,200,250,300,350,400,450,500,1000,2000,5000,10000)))) The data will show as scientific format, when it is larger than 999 (1e+03, 5e+3). I would like all the data in the digit format (1000, 5000). Does any function works