similar to: Optimize jackknife code

Hi, First, thanks to those who helped me see my gross misunderstanding of randomForest. I worked through a baging tutorial and now understand the "many tree" approach. However, it is not what I want to do! My bagged errors are accpetable but I need to use the actual tree and need a single tree application. I am using rpart for a classification tree but am interested in a more unbaised

Dear R users, I?m student of Master in Statistic and Data analysis, in New University of Lisbon. And now i?m writting my dissertation in variance estimation.So i?m using Survey Package to compute the principal estimators and theirs variances. My data is from Incoming and Expendire Survey. This is stratified Multi-stage Survey care out by National Statistic Institute of Mozambique. My domain of

Hi R-experts, I want to use the jackknife function from the bootstrap package onto a linear model. I can't figure out how to do that. The manual says the following: # To jackknife functions of more complex data structures, # write theta so that its argument x # is the set of observation numbers # and simply pass as data to jackknife the vector 1,2,..n. # For example, to jackknife #

Hi dear all, Can aynone help me about delete-d jackknife usually normal jackknife code for my data is: n <- nrow(data) y <- data$y z <- data$z theta.hat <- mean(y) / mean(z) print (theta.hat) theta.jack <- numeric(n) for (i in 1:n) theta.jack[i] <- mean(y[-i]) / mean(z[-i]) bias <- (n - 1) * (mean(theta.jack) - theta.hat) print(bias) but how i can apply delete-d jackknife

Dear all I have used the lda and predict functions to classify a set of objects of unknown origin. I would like to use a jackknife reclassification to assess the degree to which the outcomes deviate from that expected by chance. However, I can't find any function that allows me to do this. Any suggestions of how to generate the jackknife reclassification to assess classification accuracy?

Hi dear all, Can someone help me about detection of outliers using jackknife after bootstrap algorithm? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/jackknife-after-bootstrap-tp3041634p3041634.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Is there a routine in the boot package to get the jackknife-after- bootstrap influence values? That is, the influence values of a jackknife of the bootstrap estimates? I can see how one would go about it from the jack.after.boot code, but that routine only makes pretty pictures. It wouldn't be hard to write, but I find it hard to believe this isn't part of the package already. Thanks

Hi All, I'm not able to figure out how to perform a Jackknife test for a 2-sample dispersion test in R. Is there a built-in function to perform this or do we have to take a step by step approach to calculate the test statistic? Any help would be awesome. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Jackknife-for-a-2-sample-dispersion-test-tp4444274p4444274.html

Folks, Thanks for the help with the hier.part analysis. All the problems stemmed from an import problem which was solved with file.chose(). Now that I have the variables that I'd like to use I need to run some GLM models. I think I have that part under control but I'd like to use a jackknife approach to model validation (I was using a hold out sample but this seems to have fallen out

Greetings, I?ve fit the following mixed effects model using the NLME package: hd.impute.lme <- lme(I(log(HEIGHT_M - 1.37)) ~ SPECIES + SPECIES:I(1/(DBH_CM + 2.54)), random = ~ I(1/(DBH_CM + 2.54)) | PLOTID, data = trees, na.action = na.exclude) I would now like to extract a jackknife estimate of model error. I tried the following code, however, the estimate produced seems too

Dear R friends I´m interested into apply a Jackknife analysis to in order to quantify the uncertainty of my coefficients estimated by the logistic regression. I´m using a glm(family=’binomial’) because my independent variable is in 0 - 1 format. My dataset has 76000 obs, and I´m using 7 independent variables plus an offset. The idea involves to split the data in let’s say 5 random subsets and

I'm using the lme function in nmle to estimate the variance components of a fully nested two-level model: Y_ijk = mu + a_i + b_j(i) + e_k(j(i)) lme computes estimates of the variances for a, b, and e, call them v_a, v_b, and v_e, and I can use the intervals function to get confidence intervals. My understanding is that these intervals are probably not that robust plus I need intervals on the

Hello I'm trying to solve this problem without using a for loop but I have so far failed to find a solution. I have two matrices of K columns each, e.g. (K=5), and with numbers of row N_A and N_B respectively A = (1 5 3 8 15; 2 7 20 11 13; 12 19 20 21 43) B = (2 6 30 8 16; 3 8 19 11 13) (the actual matrices have hundreds of thousands of entry, that's why I'm keen to avoid

Hi, I'm working with dovecot 1.0.beta2 for pop3 only and have set index=memory, so no indizes are created on the disk. pop3_uidl_format is set to %f. The maildirs are located on an nfs-share. So generally, this setup is very similar to what qmail-popup and qmail-pop3d does. However, everytime I'm switching from qmail-pop3d to dovecot, the system load increases from less than 2 to more

Below is a SIMEX object that was generated with the "simex" function from the "simex" package applied to a logistic regression fit. From this mountain of information I would like to extract all of the values summarized in this line: .. ..$ variance.jackknife: num [1:5, 1:4] 1.684 1.144 0.85 0.624 0.519 ... Can someone suggest how to go about doing this? I can extract the

While doing pls I found the following problem > BHPLS1 <- plsr(GroupingList ~ PCIList, ncomp = 10, data = PLSdata, jackknife = >FALSE, validation = "LOO") when not enabling jackknife the command works fine, but when trying to enable jackknife i get the following error. >BHPLS1 <- plsr(GroupingList ~ PCIList, ncomp = 10, data = PLSdata, jackknife = >TRUE,

Hello R Community, I've been run the following codes. However, I've been getting an unusual segfault that I'm unable to trace its origin. Please give me a light to decipher the "caught segfault" Thanks for you attention. Bernardo. > options(STERM='iESS', editor='emacsclient') > rm(list = ls()) > > source("fgenIGLD.R") #RNG

> On January 27, 2018 at 4:19 PM Infoomatic <infoomatic at gmx.at> wrote: > > > Hi, > > While testing our migration to dovecot 2.3.0, we encountered 2 panics, 1 segmentation fault while we wanted to rebuild the solr indizes. Problem [1] was encountered while rebuilding the indizes, and now I don't know how many mails/documents are indexed or where it got stuck. [2]

Hi, While testing our migration to dovecot 2.3.0, we encountered 2 panics, 1 segmentation fault while we wanted to rebuild the solr indizes. Problem [1] was encountered while rebuilding the indizes, and now I don't know how many mails/documents are indexed or where it got stuck. [2] and [3] encountered while just playing around, since I did not know of "tokenize" and did not find a

Afternoon R help, I want to run Rasch/IRT analyses using the ltm package, however, I am using large scale survey data which requires weighting for accurate results. I attempted to create a weighted object to insert into the formulae of the ltm packages, however, the survey data only includes 30 replicate weights and a sampling weight. The svrepdesign requires additional information such as