similar to: logistic regression using "glm",which "y" is set to be "1"

Dear list: After reading the following two links: http://luna.cas.usf.edu/~mbrannic/files/regression/Logistic.html http://www.tufts.edu/~gdallal/logistic.htm I've known the mathematical basis for logistic regression.However I am still not so sure about the "logit " For a categorical independent variable, It is easy to understand the procedures how "log

Dear all: "predict.glm" provides an example to perform logistic regression when the response variable is a tow-columned matrix. I find some paradox about the degree of freedom . > summary(budworm.lg) Call: glm(formula = SF ~ sex * ldose, family = binomial) Deviance Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -1.39849 -0.32094 -0.07592 0.38220 1.10375

Dear friends: I am a new R user, and not very good at statistics and maths I find it difficult to find the minimum of this item: ((p*(b-1)-1)*(p+1)^(b-1)+1)/p^2 It seems that the method optim can find the minimum. I tried several times , but R constanly tells that " failure to find b or p" Would you please give some suggestions? Thanks in advance. Best

I'm trying to plot an extrapolated logistic sigmoid curve using glm(..., family=binomial) as follows, but neither the fitted() points or the predict()ed curve are plotting correctly: > year <- c(2003+(6/12), 2004+(2/12), 2004+(10/12), 2005+(4/12)) > percent <- c(0.31, 0.43, 0.47, 0.50) > plot(year, percent, xlim=c(2003, 2007), ylim=c(0, 1)) > lm <- lm(percent ~ year)

Hello all, I've been having trouble with assessing a breakpoint in a logistic GLM with two explanatory variables. For this analysis I've been using the 'segmented' package version 0.2-9.1. But I keep getting an error and I don't see where I would be going awry. The situation is the following: Two explanatory variables: bedekking - a variable with possible values between 0 and

hi, when i change the OBJ_ROOT and recompile the llvm, it's successful. but run following test, then the error occues: ----------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 obj]$ make -C ./test/Programs make: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs/SingleSource' make[2]: Entering directory

hi, I compile a pthread program using llvmgcc, but when i run pthread.ll, it show: ------------------ [yue at RH9 test]$ llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll [yue at RH9 test]$ ls pthread pthread.c pthread.ll pthread.ll.bc [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn 'pthread_create' using a dummy noop function instead! ERROR; return code from

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance. Fixes: a02e8964eaf9 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO") Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance. Fixes: a02e8964eaf9 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO") Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance. Fixes: e59ff2c49ae1 ("virtio-net: disable guest csum during XDP set") Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason

I try to run lli with "--load=/lib/libpthread.so", but it shows: --------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Error opening '/lib/libpthread.so.0': /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference -load request ignored. Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance. Fixes: e59ff2c49ae1 ("virtio-net: disable guest csum during XDP set") Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason

On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote: > I try to run lli with "--load=/lib/libpthread.so", but it shows: > --------------------------------------------------- > [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll > Error opening '/lib/libpthread.so.0': /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol > _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time > reference > -load request

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> This patches improve the guest receive performance. On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way. For more performance report, see patch 4. v5->v6: rebase the codes. Tonghao Zhang (4): net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:58:06AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface > > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the >

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:58:06AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface > > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the >

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> This patches improve the guest receive performance. On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way. For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6 Tonghao Zhang (6): net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation net: vhost: factor out

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> This patches improve the guest receive performance. On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way. For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6 Tonghao Zhang (6): net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation net: vhost: factor out

hi, I try to build hello.cpp using both llvmg++ and GNU g++, the generate llvm bytecode's size is about 960K, and the size of binary code generated by g++ is only 13K. Could anyone explain the difference between the two result? BWT: I rebuild the cfrontend in RH linux9.0, but when I build the hello.cpp the llvmG++ reports warnings too, it shows: ----------------------------- [yue at RH9

Try llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll -pthread You have to link in the pthreads library, and I believe -pthread is all you need on a redhat 9 box. Kevin > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-admin at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of yue > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 11:43 PM > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: [LLVMdev] pthread?