similar to: NAIVE BAYES with 10-fold cross validation

Hello, We have a system which creates thousands of regression/classification models and in cases where we have only one input variable NaiveBayes throws an error. Maybe I am mistaken and I shouldn't expect to have a model with only one input variable. We use R version 2.6.0 (2007-10-03). We use caret (v4.1.19), but have tested similar code with klaR (v.0.5.8), because caret relies on

Hallo! I would need a code for 10-fold cross validation for the classifiers Naive Bayes and svm (e1071) package. Has there already been done something like that? I tried to do it myself by applying the tune function first: library(e1071) tune.control <- tune.control(random =F, nrepeat=1, repeat.aggregate=min.,sampling=c("cross"),sampling.aggregate=mean, cross=10, best.model=T,

Hey guys, I can't get my Naive Bayes model to predict. Forgive me if its simple... I've tried about everything and can't get it to work. Reproduceable code below. Thank you, Mike -- Michael Schumacher Manager Data & Analytics - ValueClick mike.schumacher@gmail.com * Functional Example Code from UCLA:

Hi, I tried to use naivebayes in package 'e1071'. when I use following parameter, only one predictor, there is an error. > m<- naiveBayes(iris[,1], iris[,5]) > table(predict(m, iris[,1]), iris[,5]) Error in log(sapply(attribs, function(v) { : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function However, when I use two predictors, there is not error any more. > m<-

Hi, I run R 2.10.1 under ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) and klaR version 0.6-4. I compute a model over a 2 classes dataset (composed of 700 examples). To that aim, I use the function NaiveBayes provided in the package klaR. When I then use the prediction function : predict(my_model, new_data). I get the following warning : "In FUN(1:747[[747L]], ...) : Numerical 0 probability with

Hi! I'm using the Naive Bayes classifier provided by the e1071 package ( http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/e1071) and I've noticed that the predict function has a different behavior when the level set of the columns used for prediction is different from the ones used for fitting. From inspecting the predict.naiveBayes I came to the conclusion that this is due to the conversion of

Hello I have a rather simple code and for some reason it produces an error message. If someone can tell me why and how to fix it, I would be very greatful. Thank you in advance. ##### create data set.seed(10) n <- 200 # number of training points n.test <- 200 # number of test points p<-2 # dimension of input space z <-

I'm developing a naive bayes in R. I have the following data and am trying to predict on returned (class). dat = data.frame(home=c(0,1,1,0,0), gender=c("M","M","F","M","F"), returned=c(0,0,1,1,0)) str(dat) dat$home <- as.factor(dat$home) dat$returned <- as.factor(dat$returned) library(e1071) m <- naiveBayes(returned ~ ., dat) m

I am wondering if anybody here have a simple example in R for Naive Bayes. For example, I can do k-means clustering on the "iris" data - data(iris) cl <- kmeans(iris[,1:4], 3) cl$cluster cbind(1:150,iris$Species) =========== But how to do Naive Bayes classification in the same "iris" data? Many thanks! -- View this message in context:

Hi, I have a small doubt regarding naive Bayes. I am able to classify the data's properly but i am just stuck up with how to get the probability values for naive bayes. In the case of SVM we have "attr" function that helps in displaying the probability values. Is there any function similar to "attr" in naive Bayes that can be used for displaying the attribute values. my

Hi This is a question regarding classification performance using different methods. So far I've tried NaiveBayes (klaR package), svm (e1071) package and randomForest (randomForest). What has puzzled me is that randomForest seems to perform far better (32% classification error) than svm and NaiveBayes, which have similar classification errors (45%, 48% respectively). A similar difference in

Hello fellow R programmers, I'm trying to use package e1071's naiveBayes function to create a model with weighted data. See example below, variable "d" is a count variable that provides the # of records for the given observation combination. Is anyone aware of a "weight" argument to this method? I've been unsuccessful in my research. Thanks, Mike

I am used to packages like e1071 where you have a tune step and then pass your tunings to train. It seems with caret, tuning and training are both handled by train. I am using train and trainControl to find my hyper parameters like so: MyTrainControl=trainControl( method = "cv", number=5, returnResamp = "all", classProbs = TRUE ) rbfSVM <- train(label~., data =

Le jeudi 09 f?vrier 2012 ? 15:31 +0200, Kari Ruohonen a ?crit : > Hi, > I am trying to replicate a training of AttributeSelectedClassifier with > CFsSubsetEval, BestFirst and NaiveBayes that I have initially done with > Weka. Now, I am trying to use RWeka in R. > > I have a problem of passing arguments to the CfsSubsetEval, BestFirst > and NaiveBayes. I have first created an

Hi all I am using the caret package and having difficulty in obtaining the results using regression, I used the glmnet to model and trying to get the coefficients and the model parameters I am trying to use the extractPrediction to obtain a confusion matrix and it seems to be giving me errors. x<-read.csv("x.csv", header=TRUE); y<-read.csv("y.csv", header=TRUE);

Hi, I am trying to construct a svmpoly model using the "caret" package (please see code below). Using the same data, without changing any setting, I am just changing the seed value. Sometimes it constructs the model successfully, and sometimes I get an ?Error in indexes[[j]] : subscript out of bounds?. For example when I set seed to 357 following code produced result only for 8

Hi, I'm currently using the R package e1071 to train naive bayes classifiers and came across a bug: When the posterior probabilities of all classes are small, the result from the predict.naiveBayes function become NaNs. This is an issue with the treatment of the log-transformed probabilities inside the predict.naiveBayes function. Here is an example to demonstrate the problem (you might need

Hi, I have written a code in R for classifying microarray data using naive bayes, the code is given below: library(e1071) train<-read.table("Z:/Documents/train.txt",header=T); test<-read.table("Z:/Documents/test.txt",header=T); cl <- c(c(rep("ALL",10), rep("AML",10))); cl <- factor(cl) model <- naiveBayes(train,cl);

Hy, I got the following problem when trying to build a rpart model and using everything but LOOCV. Originally, I wanted to used k-fold partitioning, but every partitioning except LOOCV throws the following warning: ---- Warning message: In nominalTrainWorkflow(dat = trainData, info = trainInfo, method = method, : There were missing values in resampled performance measures. ----- Below are some

I want to use the caret package and found out about the timingSamps obtion to obtain the time which is needed to predict results. But, as soon as I set a value for this option, the whole model generation fails. Check this example: ------------------------- library(caret) tc=trainControl(method='LGOCV', timingSamps=10) tcWithout=trainControl(method='LGOCV')