similar to: Splitting up the micEcon package?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Splitting up the micEcon package?"

2005 Apr 20
2
heckit / tobit estimation
Dear All, we (Ott Toomet and I) would like to add functions for maximum likelihood (ML) estimations of generalized tobit models of type 2 and type 5 (*see below) in my R package for microeconomic analysis "micEcon". So far we have called these functions "tobit2( )" and "tobit5( )". Are these classifications well known? How are these functions called in other
2005 Aug 16
1
Fwd: Documenting data sets with many variables
Hi, since nobody answered to my first message, I try to explain my problem more clearly and more general this time: I have a data set in my R package "micEcon", which has many variables (82). Therefore, I would like to avoid to describe all variables in the "\format" section of the documentation (.Rd file). However, doing this lets "R CMD check" complain about
2005 Feb 21
0
New package for microeconomics: micEcon
Dear all, I have uploaded a new package called micEcon (version 0.1-3) to CRAN (an early version of this package has been already presented at useR! 2004). It contains tools for microeconomic analysis and microeconomic modeling. These are for instance: - tools for demand analysis with the 'Almost Ideal Demand System' (AIDS): e.g. econometric estimation, calculation of price and
2005 Feb 21
0
New package for microeconomics: micEcon
Dear all, I have uploaded a new package called micEcon (version 0.1-3) to CRAN (an early version of this package has been already presented at useR! 2004). It contains tools for microeconomic analysis and microeconomic modeling. These are for instance: - tools for demand analysis with the 'Almost Ideal Demand System' (AIDS): e.g. econometric estimation, calculation of price and
2008 Mar 07
0
Packages micEcon, sampleSelection, and maxLik
Dear R Users: We have splitted up the micEcon package into three packages: a) Package "maxLik" provides tools for maximum likelihood estimations (see http://www.maxLik.org). b) Package "sampleSelection" provides tools for estimating Heckman-type sample selection/generalized tobit models (see http://www.sampleSelection.org). c) Package "micEcon" contains the
2008 Mar 07
0
Packages micEcon, sampleSelection, and maxLik
Dear R Users: We have splitted up the micEcon package into three packages: a) Package "maxLik" provides tools for maximum likelihood estimations (see http://www.maxLik.org). b) Package "sampleSelection" provides tools for estimating Heckman-type sample selection/generalized tobit models (see http://www.sampleSelection.org). c) Package "micEcon" contains the
2006 Feb 17
1
Heckman regression / adjustment for standard errors?
Hello folks, I am trying to estimate the two-step Heckman regression model. I would like to make an adjustment for intragroup correlations. Stata can implement this with the "cluster" option, but I am really hoping to stick with R. It seems that the micEcon package is the primary source for this two-step regression model (i.e., heckit), but I can't find a way to make the
2003 Feb 20
2
is.numeric
Hi, I have a vector, which contains both strings and numbers, e.g. > foo <- c("str1",1234,"str2",0.9876) I want to know if a distinct element of the vector is a string or a number and took "is.numeric", but > is.numeric(foo[2]) [1] FALSE because R treats the numbers in a mixed vectors as strings: > foo [1] "str1" "1234"
2004 Nov 01
5
make apply() return a list
Hi, I have a dataframe (say myData) and want to get a list (say myList) that contains a matrix for each row of the dataframe myData. These matrices are calculated based on the corresponding row of myData. Using a for()-loop to do this is very slow. Thus, I tried to use apply(). However, afaik apply() does only return a list if the matrices have different dimensions, while my matrices have
2006 Sep 28
2
R CMD build when the package name is different from the directory name
Hi, I was really happy when I saw that in R version 2.3.0 "R CMD check" works for packages whose package name is different from the directory name in which it is located (see http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/NEWS). Now, I can have branches of my packages in directories like "[...]/branches/<version number>/", while I had to use "[...]/branches/<version
2004 Mar 16
2
R CMD check warning on predict.systemfit
Hi, I added a new function "predict.systemfit" to our package "systemfit" to make it closer to other packages (e.g. lm). Now "R CMD check" complains that the generic function "predict" has only the argument "object", while our function "predict.systemfit" has more arguments. However, the function "predict.lm" has also more
2004 Aug 25
1
License for including datasets in packages
Dear All, I would like to publish a function for 'heckit' estimations together with two examples from Greene's and Wooldridge's econometric textbooks. These examples use the dataset of Mroz (1987) that is also available in John Fox' "car" package. However, not all variables that are used in my examples are available in the "car" package. Therefore, I
2008 May 29
1
package for stochastic frontier models?
I need to estimate maximum tree crown radius and am looking for a package to prepare stochastic frontier models in R. I have not found any package references on Nabble R help, google, or R help. Any tips on a package for this? With regards, Aaron Trowbridge Researcher BV Research Centre Smithers B.C. -- View this message in context:
2007 Aug 30
1
Data simulation with R
Hi, I am currently on a placement here at GSK for my studies, and I'm working on Heckman Models. I have to make simulations, in order to see whether these models are efficient or not. I have to generate a dataset under the following constraints: - outcome is 0 or 1 - one control group, one treatment group, there must be no treatment effect - generate one continuous variable and one
2004 Aug 25
0
Heckman estimation
Hi, I wrote a function to perform a two-step Heckman (also known as "heckit") estimation. This function is mainly a wrapper function to "glm" (1st step probit estimation) and "lm" (2nd step OLS estimation). Though this function is not perfect yet, it is IMHO already very useful. Since there were some questions about Heckmann estimation in this list, I would like
2004 Feb 19
6
R for economists (was: Almost Ideal Demand System)
Hi, I did not find any web page about using R in economics and econometrics so far. However, this does not mean that there is none (searching with google for "R" and "economics" gives many pages about economics and a name like Firstname R. Lastname on it ;-)). Does anybody in the list does know such a web page? If not, I will be happy if you, Ajay, could build and
2003 Sep 26
2
checking generic/method consistency
Hi, I wrote a package for linear programming and want to submit it to CRAN. Since the package 'quadprog' has a function with the name 'solve.QP' to perform Quadratic Programming, I named my (main) function 'solve.LP'. However 'R CMD check' gives one warning: * checking generic/method consistency ... WARNING solve: function(a, b, ...) solve.LP:
2020 Oct 09
1
[External] Re: unable to access index for repository...
>>>>> Steven Yen >>>>> on Fri, 9 Oct 2020 05:39:48 +0800 writes: > Oh Hi Arne, You may recall we visited with this before. I > do not believe the problem is algorithm specific. The > algorithms I use the most often are BFGS and BHHH (or > maxBFGS and maxBHHH). For simple econometric models such > as probit, Tobit, and evening
2007 Apr 09
1
R:Maximum likelihood estimation using BHHH and BFGS
Dear R users, I am new to R. I would like to find *maximum likelihood estimators for psi and alpha* based on the following *log likelihood function*, c is consumption data comprising 148 entries: fn<-function(c,psi,alpha) { s1<-sum(for(i in 1:n){(c[i]-(psi^(-1/alpha)*(lag(c[i],-1))))^2* (lag(c[i],-1)^((-2)*(alpha+1)) )}); s2<- sum(for(m in 1:n){log(lag(c[m],-1)^(((2)*alpha)+2))});
2004 Nov 29
3
systemfit - SUR
Hello to everyone, I have 2 problems and would be very pleased if anyone can help me: 1) When I use the package "systemfit" for SUR regressions, I get two different variance-covariance matrices when I firstly do the SUR regression ("The covariance matrix of the residuals used for estimation") and secondly do the OLS regressions. In the manual for "systemfit" on page