similar to: flops calculation

Dear R users, I am trying to draw a network using igraph package. I intend to place the hub nodes (the ones with the relatively more connection with other nodes) in the center of the graph. Also, the graph need to be in the fashion that the higher the correlation between two nodes is , the closer the two nodes will be. Is there any layout that can help or any other way to do this? Thanks in

Hi R users, I am using built-in functions in igraph package to draw networks . I need to compare several network with exactly the same structure but with edge hightlighted differently. I am wondering if there is a way to save the layout so that every graph will look the same as each other except for the colors of edges. Or is there any parameter I can set for this purpose?? Thanks in advance,

Hey, I am trying to make a data frame and the name of a column is composed of a number, a dot, and a word, such as "1.whatever". But I always get this error message:"syntax error, unexpected SYMBOL, expecting ',' in:" while printing data frame out . When I rename the column with purely letter, everything works fine. Some suggestion about the cause/ solution ?? Thanks.

Hi R users, I am wondering if it there is any R's function helping integrate venn diagram and pie chart to compare two related datasets. I know the package limma(bioconductor) has something built-in for making venn diagram, but I guess it would be very painful to use line and text to specify the proportions in the fashion of pie chart . Thanks in advance, Kevin Chang -- View this

Hi All, I am trying to rearrange alphabetically each element in a character vector. ex: say the first element in the vector is "cba", and my goal is to turn it into "abc". The suggested function to use is sort(). But it turns out that sort doesn't work at the level of element. So I am wondering that if there is an alternative function for this purpose. Please help me out .

Hi, The loop I wrote executes correctly but is stalled seriously. Is there a way to hasten execution without coming up with a brand new algorithm ? please help. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/stalled-loop-tf4451301.html#a12699524 Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi R users, I am trying generate the indices for locating a in the string it come from. Given the length of the string, it will take too long using the combn() for further comparison. I am wondering if R has any built-in function for this purpose. To make it concrete: this.substring="cc" this.string="ccc" start.location=1,2 end.location=2,3 Thanks in advance, Kevin

Hi, Below you can see the updated benchmark results for the new SLP-vectorizer. As you can see, there is a small number of compile time regressions, a single major runtime *regression, and many performance gains. There is a tiny increase in code size: 30k for the whole test-suite. Based on the numbers below I would like to enable the SLP-vectorizer by default for -O3. Please let me know if you

Hi, LLVM’s SLP-vectorizer is a new pass that combines similar independent instructions in a straight-line code. It is currently not enabled by default, and people who want to experiment with it can use the clang command line flag “-fslp-vectorize”. I ran LLVM’s test suite with and without the SLP vectorizer on a Sandybridge mac (using SSE4, w/o AVX). Based on my performance measurements

On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:30 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > Hi, > > LLVM’s SLP-vectorizer is a new pass that combines similar independent instructions in a straight-line code. It is currently not enabled by default, and people who want to experiment with it can use the clang command line flag “-fslp-vectorize”. I ran LLVM’s test suite with and without the SLP

On Jul 14, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 13, 2013, at 11:30 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> LLVM’s SLP-vectorizer is a new pass that combines similar independent instructions in a straight-line code. It is currently not enabled by default, and people who want to experiment with it

Hi, Sorry for the delay in response. I measured the code size change and noticed small changes in both directions for individual programs. I found a 30k binary size growth for the entire testsuite + SPEC. I attached an updated performance report that includes both compile time and performance measurements. Thanks, Nadav On Jul 14, 2013, at 10:55 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com>

On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >> PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite happy about CentOS (or RedHat if >> I >> look back). One day I realized how happy I am that I chose RedHat way >> back, - that was when all Debian (and its clones like Ubuntu,...) admins

Hello; I was able to build and install llvm(3.0) under Ubuntu 11.10 (using the ./configure script found under llvm source, and then make and make install). While configuring, I gave --prefix as a directory where I would like llvm to be installed. I did not give --with-llvmgccdir and the --enable-optimized argument to configure. Because 3.0 doesn't come with llvmgcc source/binaries and I

Hello all, I have evaluated the compile-time and execution-time performance of Polly canonicalization passes. Details can be referred to http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/recent_activity. There are four runs: pollyBasic (run 45): clang -O3 -Xclang -load -Xclang LLVMPolly.so pollyNoGenSCEV (run 44): clang -O3 -Xclang -load -Xclang LLVMPolly.so -mllvm -polly -mllvm -polly-codegen-scev

On 11/08/2011 03:36 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:12 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 11/08/2011 11:45 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: >>> I've attached the latest version of my autovectorization patch. >>> >>> Working through the test suite has proved to be a productive >>> experience ;) -- And almost all of the bugs that it revealed

On 11/08/2011 11:45 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > I've attached the latest version of my autovectorization patch. > > Working through the test suite has proved to be a productive > experience ;) -- And almost all of the bugs that it revealed have now > been fixed. There are still two programs that don't compile with > vectorization turned on, and I'm working on those now,

I've attached the latest version of my autovectorization patch. Working through the test suite has proved to be a productive experience ;) -- And almost all of the bugs that it revealed have now been fixed. There are still two programs that don't compile with vectorization turned on, and I'm working on those now, but in case anyone feels like playing with vectorization, this patch

At 2013-09-09 13:07:07,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 09/09/2013 05:18 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> >> At 2013-09-09 05:52:35,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> >>> On 09/08/2013 08:03 PM, Star Tan wrote: >>> Also, I wonder if your runs include the dependence analysis. If this is >>> the

On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:12 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 11/08/2011 11:45 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > I've attached the latest version of my autovectorization patch. > > > > Working through the test suite has proved to be a productive > > experience ;) -- And almost all of the bugs that it revealed have now > > been fixed. There are still two programs that