similar to: fit.contrast and interaction terms

Dear R Users, I am looking for an alternative to AIC or BIC to choose model parameters. This is somewhat of a general statistics question, but I ask it in this forum as I am looking for a R solution. Suppose I have one dependent variable, y, and two independent variables, x1 an x2. I can perform three regressions: reg1: y~x1 reg2: y~x2 reg3: y~x1+x2 The AIC of reg1 is 2000, reg2 is

> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:03 PM, jin chuan see via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Thanks for the reply. I managed to identify and fixed a few errors in my implementation. > > However, there are a few errors that i am not sure what is it indicating. > For starters, i think i should explain what i am trying to achieve. > > I am

Hi, I am trying to create a scatterplot, coding each point to one of 5 populations. I was successful when I did this for one set of data, yet when I try plotting other data a blank plot appears (although the axes are labelled and I can fit the regression lines from each population). I have tried a variety of things to fix this but nothing seems to work. I can plot the points if I do not

Hi all, Our target does not have native support for 64-bit integers, so we rely on library calls for certain operations (like sdiv). We recently ran into a problem where these operations that are expanded to library calls aren't maintaining the proper ordering in relation to other chains in the DAG. The following snippet of a DAG demonstrates the problem. t0: ch = EntryToken t2:

I am relatively new to R and object oriented programming. I have relied on SAS for most of my data analysis. I teach an introductory undergraduate forecasting course using the Diebold text and I am considering using R in addition to SAS and Eviews in the course. I work primarily with univariate or multivariate time series data. I am having a great deal of difficulty understanding and working with

Hi, I have a problem regarding sub-register definitions and LiveIntervals on our target. When a subregister is defined, other parts of the register are always left untouched - they are neither read or def:ed. It however seems that Codegen treats subregister definitions as somehow clobbering the whole register. The SSA-code looks like this after isel: (Reg0 and Reg1 are 16bit registers. Reg2,

On Jan 19, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Patrick Boettcher wrote: > Hi list, > > in our LLVM-based-project we are writing a backend for our > processor. The > architecture is a quite straight-forward RISC, but it does not have > hardware interlocks, i.e. data hazards involving memory access must be > resolved by the compiler, either by scheduling unrelated > instructions or >

Hi list, in our LLVM-based-project we are writing a backend for our processor. The architecture is a quite straight-forward RISC, but it does not have hardware interlocks, i.e. data hazards involving memory access must be resolved by the compiler, either by scheduling unrelated instructions or by inserting NOOPs into the load delay slots: ---- For example, code which looks like that: load

Hi, Its that time of the year again. Here is the results on openSUSE 13.1 PPC64. Total of 3 failures which seems to be due the same problem (the value in brackets is the time counter from the build system): [ 3468s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc32-vacopy.ll:21:10: error: expected string not found in input [ 3468s] ; CHECK: lwz [[REG3:[0-9]+]], {{.*}} [ 3468s]

Dear R users, I have a problem with multicollinearity in mixed models and I am using lmer in package lme4. From previous mailing list, I learn of a reply "http://www.mail-archive.com/r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch/msg38537.html" which states that if not for interpretation but just for prediction, multicollinearity does not matter much. However, I am using mixed model to interpret something,

Running llc with '-verify-machineinstrs' may tell you which instruction break the SSA form. Ruiling From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of jin chuan see via llvm-dev Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 10:02 AM To: Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Live Register Spilling Sorry about the

İsmai, Thanks for testing these. Can you please file a bug report (and CC me on it), and attach the full output of these failing tests? (When the test fails you should see the full command -- rerun it without piping the output into FileCheck). Thanks again, Hal ----- Original Message ----- > From: "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws> > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing

Is it possible to get a register number to which the value is allocated to in MIPS in DAGToDAG class? More Specifically: SDValue Reg3 = Node->getOperand(3); if (RegisterSDNode *R = dyn_cast<RegisterSDNode>(Reg3)) { op3 = cast<RegisterSDNode>(Reg3)->getReg();

> On Feb 27, 2015, at 1:59 AM, Ambuj Agrawal <ambujbwt at gmail.com> wrote: > > Is it possible to get a register number to which the value is allocated to in MIPS in DAGToDAG class? > > More Specifically: > SDValue Reg3 = Node->getOperand(3); > if (RegisterSDNode *R = dyn_cast<RegisterSDNode>(Reg3)) >

I am having an issue with lmer that I wonder if someone could explain. I am trying to fit a mixed effects model to a set of longitudinal data over a set of individual subjects: (fm1 <- lmer(x ~ time + (time|ID),aa)) I quite often find that the correlation between the random effects is 1.0: Linear mixed model fit by REML Formula: x ~ time + (time | ID) Data: aa AIC BIC logLik deviance

Thanks for your reply Quentin. I do understand that the registers are allocated much later in the pipeline. I am assuming that the physical registers are allocated before MipsAsmPrinter class. I am doing something like if (MI->getOpcode() == Mips::OPCODE) { unsigned n = MI->getNumOperands(); for(unsigned i=0 ; i < n ; i++) { const MachineOperand &MO =

I'm writing a pass that looks at the operands of certain non-commutable instructions and swaps a couple of them if certain conditions exist (a register bank conflict in the instruction). If the conflict exists, I build a new instruction which has the 2nd and 3rd operands swapped (using BuildMI). Then I want to get rid of the original instruction. I had done some searching and found that

> Of course, and the point is that, for example, on x86_64, the zext here is free. I'm still trying to understand the problem... > > In the example you provided in your previous e-mail, we choose the solution: > > `GEP @Global, zext(V)` -> `GEP (@Global + zext VStart), {i64 0,+,1}` > `V` -> `trunc({i64 0,+,1}) + VStart` > > instead of the actually-better

Dear all, i am doing linear regression with robust error to know the effect of a (x) variable on (y)other if i execute the command i found positive trend. But if i check the effect of number of (x.x1,x2,x3)variables on same (y)variable then the positive effect shwon by x variable turns to negative. so plz help me in this situation. Barjesh Kochar Research scholar

Hi Evan, thanks for your response. On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Evan Cheng wrote: >> For example, code which looks like that: >> >> load 0x1234, reg1 >> noop >> noop >> add reg1, 1 >> load 0x1236, reg2 >> >> can be safely transformed to: >> >> load 0x1234, reg1 >> load 0x1236, reg2 >> noop >> add reg1, 1 >> >