similar to: Reimplement order somehow

After ordering the table of membership degrees , i must get the difference between the first and second coloumns , between the first and second largest membership degree of object i. This for K=2,K=3,....to K.max=6. This difference is multiplyed by the Crisp silhouette index vector (si). Too it dependending on K=2,...,K.max=6; the result divided by the sum of these differences I need a final

hello, i'm pete ,how can i order rows of matrix by max to min value? I have a matrix of membership degrees, with 82 (i) rows and K coloumns, K are clusters. I need first and second largest elements of the i-th row. for example 1 0.66 0.04 0.01 0.30 2 0.02 0.89 0.09 0.00 3 0.06 0.92 0.01 0.01 4 0.07 0.71 0.21 0.01 5 0.10 0.85 0.04 0.01 6 0.91 0.04 0.02 0.02 7 0.00 0.01 0.98 0.00 8 0.02

Hi all, Within a foreach loop with doSNOW, we cant call functions which come from the non-default package. We need to load(require/library) the package once more within the foreach loop. Anyone knows why would happen like this? Is it caused by the snow package and something happened when "snow" parallelize the job? Other than load the package once more with in the foreach loop, is

All, I am not understanding the scoping used in foreach when it is used inside a function. I keep getting "could not find function" errors for functions that are in memory when I try to use foreach within a function call. I have a simple example below. "testFun" is in memory and works when called by foreach directly, but when I place foreach in a function called

Dear expeRts, is it possible to carry out calculations between different foreach() calls? As for nested loops, you want to carry out calcuations not depending on the inner loop only once and not for each iteration of the innermost loop. Cheers, Marius library(foreach) foreach(i=1:3) %:% foreach(j=1:2) %do% { i <- i+1 print(paste(i,j)) } foreach(i=1:3) %:% i

I know this is not a revolution support forum, but as anyone noticed the following? I have a foreach loop to generate random samples. If I run the exact code below in normal r (2.14.1) it works as expected, but if I run it from revolution 4.2.0 each loop returns the same numbers. The only way I can get revolution to give different numbers is using 1 instead of 8 in registerDoSNOW(makeCluster(8,

Dear all, I have been working on an idempotent version of apply, such that applying a function f(x) = x (ie. force) returns the same array (or a permutation of it depending on the order of the margins): a <- array(1:27, c(2,3,4)) all.equal(a, iapply(a, 1, force)) all.equal(a, iapply(a, 1:2, force)) all.equal(a, iapply(a, 1:3, force)) all.equal(aperm(a, c(2,1,3)), iapply(a, 2, force))

Hi all, I would like to parallelize some R code and would like to use the 'foreach' package with a foreach loop. However, whenever I call a function from an enabled package outside of MASS, I get an error message that a number of the functions aren't recognized (even though the functions should be defined). For example: library(foreach) library(doSMP) library(survival) # Create the

Dear all, Just wondering if someone could help me out converting my code from a for() loop into a foreach() loop or using one of the apply() function. I have a very large dataset and so I'm hoping to make use of a parallel backend to speed up the processing time. I'm having trouble getting selecting three variables in the dataset to use in the foreach() loops. My for() loop code is:

I started to look at ways to improve times of certain very parallel tasks and thought that foreach should be a valid candidate to do the job. So, i opened foreach tutorial by Steve Weston and started timing examples from it. First example from tutorial is  >system.time(for(i in 1:100000) sqrt(i))    user  system elapsed     0.06    0.00    0.06  > system.time(foreach(i=1:100000) %do%

Simplify how we handle lvm.conf.

Hi! I'm a recent convert from Stata, so forgive my ignorance. In Stata, I can write foreach loops (example below) foreach var of varlist p1-p14 { foreach y of varlist p15-p269 { reg `var' `y' } } It's looping p1-p15, p1-p16...., p1-p269, p2-p15, p2-p16,... p2-p269,... variable pairs. How can I write something similar in R? I 'tried' understanding the

libswfdec/swfdec_as_array.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- libswfdec/swfdec_as_object.c | 2 ++ libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie.c | 12 ++++++++---- test/image/Makefile.am | 16 +++++++++++++++- test/image/text-field-autosize-6.swf |binary test/image/text-field-autosize-6.swf.png |binary test/image/text-field-autosize-7.swf |binary

Hello all, When I wanted to use package "foreach", I got the Error. That is: > library(foreach) Error in get(Info[i, 1], envir = env) : internal error -3 in R_decompress1 Error: package/namespace load failed for ‘foreach’ I am using R-2.14.2, 64 bit. Even I reinstalled R and package "foreach", the Error could not be fixed. Would you please to give me some advice? Thanks

Hello, I'm running some code that requires untaring many files in the first step. This takes a lot of time and I'd like to do this in parallel, if possible. If it's the disk reading speed that is the bottleneck I guess I should not expect an improvement, but perhaps it's the processor. So I want to try this out. I'm working on windows 7 with R 2.15.1 and the latest foreach

Hi there! I have become a big fan of the 'foreach' package allowing me to do a lot of stuff in parallel. For example, evaluating the function f on all elements in a vector x is easily accomplished: foreach(i=1:length(x),.combine=c) %dopar% f(x[i]) Here the .combine=c option tells foreach to combine output using the c()-function. That is, to return it as a vector. Today I discovered the

I'm trying to find examples of the foreach pattern being used in tablegen files. The problem I am trying to solve is to simplify the amount of tablegen code I have to produce because each operand of an instruction can be a register or a literal. So for binary, we have 4 instructions, ternary, 8, and quaternary 16 combinations. Instead of writing all the combinations out, I'd like to use

Hi all, Sometimes I'll find myself "ctrl-c"-ing like a madman to kill some code that's parallelized via foreach/doMC when I realized that I just set my cpu off to do something boneheaded, and it will keep doing that thing for a while. In these situations, since I interrupted its normal execution, foreach/doMC doesn't "clean up" after itself by killing the

Hi, just during these vacation days, I'm trying to approach with multicore package and I have some troubles with foreach. ex. foreach(.combine=c, ii=1:200, jj=1:500) %dopar% makefunction[ii,jj] Command seem to work but if I see ii and jj value at the and of cycle, they are both 200 instead than ii=200 and jj=500. Why?? Can someone help me? Thank you in advance. Max -- View this

That is what I currently have, I'm trying to simplify them even further since my multiclass file is enormous because of the amount of combinations. I have things like this: multiclass instmcRegImm<...> { def rr: inst<...>; def ri: inst<...>; def ir: inst<...>; def ii: inst<...>; } multiclass instmc<...> { defm i8 : instmcRegImm<...>; ^-- repeat for 15