similar to: Variable c and function c

I'm using a javascript program to execute rsync 2.5.6 compiled with cygwin on Windows XP Pro machines. These backup the user's "My Documents" folder to a Linux server running rsync 2.5.6 in daemon mode when the user logs in to XP and certain conditions are met (e.g. user hasn't backed up for a few days, user on the network etc). This works great except every now and then

Hello, I've been trying to configure a samba 3.0 server to play nicely both with smbclient and with MS windows. The server in question is running the samba 3.0.0final-1 with the default smb.conf file (for now). At present, if I try to view the list of shares from within windows, I get a login dialog box and cannot proceed. Using 'smbclient -L', I can view the list of shares and

I couldn't catch Monty on IRC, so I'll ask here... how's RC3 coming along? Can we expect RC3 anytime soon, and what are the main improvements over RC2? -- Vorbis Xtreme | http://solair.eunet.yu/~aldov/ Ogg Vorbis - free, open source audio __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com ---

I have two problems where I've come up with some code that will do the analysis that I want, but it looks pretty clumsy. In the first case, I calculate the variance on five different columns for each of 14 clusters and get them into one matrix. I get the job done, but I would have thought that it could be done in one or two lines, not six, and be generalized so that it didn't matter how

Dear list, When using as.POSIXlt with times measured down to microseconds the default format.POSIXlt seems to cause some possibly undesirable behaviour: According to the code in format.POSIXlt the maximum accuracy of printing fractional seconds is 1 microsecond, but if I do; options( digits.secs = 6 ) as.POSIXlt( 1.000002 , tz="", origin="1970-01-01") as.POSIXlt( 1.999998 ,

Hi, Recently, I made a btrfs to use. And I met slowness problem. Trying to diag it. I found this: 1. dd if=/dev/zero of=test count=1024 bs=1MB This is fast, at about 25MB/s, and reasonable iowait. 2. dd if=/dev/zero of=test count=1 bs=1GB This is pretty slow, at about 1.5MB/s, and 90%+ iowait, constantly. May I know why it works like this? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Dear All I am using rgenoud to solve the following maximization problem: myfunc <- function(x) { x1 <- x[1] x2 <- x[2] if (x1^2+x2^2 > 1) return(-9999999) else x1+x2 } genoud(myfunc, nvars=2, Domains=rbind(c(0,1),c(0,1)),max=TRUE,boundary.enforcement=2,solution.tolerance=0.000001) How can one increase the precision of the solution $par [1] 0.7072442 0.7069694 ? I

All - I have data: TL age 388 4 418 4 438 4 428 5 539 10 432 4 444 7 421 4 438 4 419 4 463 6 423 4 ... [truncated] and I'm trying to fit a simple Von Bertalanffy growth curve with program: #Creates a Von Bertalanffy growth model VonB=nls(TL~Linf*(1-exp(-k*(age-t0))), data=box5.4, start=list(Linf=1000, k=0.1, t0=0.1), trace=TRUE) #Scatterplot of the data plot(TL~age, data=box5.4,

Hello, (this is a recap of yesterday''s discussion on BTRFS IRC, also to save relevant pastes before pastebins expire) I have my /home on btrfs; a cronjob makes one snapshot every 30 minutes; these snapshots are kept for 24-48 hours, then deleted in batches. This is a 16K Leaf/Node BTRFS on top of mdadm RAID1. As system uptime approached 2 weeks, I started noticing that the free space

Hello I've used read.table to read a file that contains numbers such as 0.00001 when I write them back with write.table those numbers appear as 1e-5 How can I keep the old format? thanks -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/number-format-writing-1e-5-instead-of-0-00001-tp3003831p3003831.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I''ve been working on running down intermittent ENOSPC issues. I can only seem to replicate ENOSPC errors when running zlib compression. However, I have been seeing similar ENOSPC errors to a lesser extent when playing with the LZ4HC patches. I apologize for not following up on this sooner, but I had drifted away from using zlib, and didn''t notice there was still an issue. My

Hello, I have a bigger problem in calculating the Maximum Likelihood Estimator regarding the degree of freedom of a multivariate skew-t copula. First of all I would like to describe what this is all about, so that you can understand my problem: I have 2 time series with more than 3000 entries each. I would like to calculate a multivariate skew-t Copula that fits this time series. Notice:

Dear R Users on a self-written function for calculating maximum likelihood probability (plz check function code at the bottom of this message), one value, wden, suddenly jump to zero. detail info as following: w[11]=2.14 lnw =2.37 2.90 3.76 ... regw =1.96 1.77 1.82 .... wden=0.182 0.178 0.179... w[11]=2.14 lnw=2.37 2.90 3.76 ... regw =1.96 1.77 1.82 .... wden=0.182

Hello again... sorry to be posting yet again, but I hadn't anticipated this problem. I am trying to now put the names found in one column in data frame 1 (lets call it df.1[,1]) in to a list from the rows where the values in df.1[,2] match values in a column of another dataframe (df.2[3]) I tried to write this function so that it put the list of names (called Iffy) where the 2 criteria

Hi If I get a p-value less than 0.05 does that mean there is a significant relation between the 2 ranked lists? Sometimes I get a low correlation such as 0.3 or even 0.2 and the p-value is so low , such as 0.000001 , does that mean it is significant also? and would that be interpreted as significant low positive correlation or significant moderate positive correlation? Also,can R calculate the

Hello, I have tested a distribution for normality using the Shapiro-Welch statistic. The result of this is the following: Shapiro-Wilk normality test data: mydata W = 0.9989, p-value = 0.8791 I know that the p-value > 0.05 (for my purposes) means that the data IS normally distributed but what I am not sure is with the W value, what values tell me that the data is normally

I want to use R to run a reaction-time experiment: Something appears on the screen, I respond by typing something (one keystroke), the system measures the speed of my response. R would be great for this if only I didn't have to hit Enter to enter that keystroke. I am doing such experiments now but they require two actions per trial: hit keystroke, hit Enter. Is there some way that R can be

We need an smb_mb() before waitqueue_active to avoid missing wakeups. Before Mitch was hitting a deadlock between the ordered flushers and the transaction commit because the ordered flushers were waiting for more refs and were never woken up, so those smp_mb()''s are the most important. Everything else I added for correctness sake and to avoid getting bitten by this again somewhere else.

The documentation states : An alternative parametrization (often used in ecology) is by the mean ?mu?, and ?size?, the dispersion parameter. However, this fails : > rnbinom(10, mu = 100, size = 0) [1] NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN Warning message: In rnbinom(10, mu = 100, size = 0) : NAs produced For dispersion set to 0, it should work like drawing from a Poisson distribution.

Hi, Is there anyone know if BUGS language allows the combination of variables as response such as Y[i] <- a*X1[i]+b*X2[i] Y[i] ~ dnorm(c,d) It seems doesn't work in my model. The problem is between two ######. The error message is > modelCheck("BayesBioMarker.BUGS") model is syntactically correct > modelData(paste("BUGS_data.txt",sep="")) data