Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Power analysis for glm-function"
2008 Apr 08
3
post hoc statistical power
I remember reading about post hoc statistical power on R-help. But I
can't seem to find them with RSiteSearch("post hoc statistical power")
and variations of it.
I would like to learn more about post hoc statistical power, its
meaningfulness, advantages and disadvantages. I thought the issue was
settled after Tukey's 1993 paper about post hoc statistical power
being
2006 Apr 23
1
Comparing GLMMs and GLMs with quasi-binomial errors?
Dear All,
I am analysing a dataset on levels of herbivory in seedlings in an
experimental setup in a rainforest.
I have seven classes/categories of seedling damage/herbivory that I want to
analyse, modelling each separately.
There are twenty maternal trees, with eight groups of seedlings around each.
Each tree has a TreeID, which I use as the random effect (blocking factor).
There are two
2008 May 05
1
Count data in random Forest
Hello R-user!
I am running R 2.7.0 on a Power Book (Tiger). (I am still R and
statistics beginner)
I try to find the most important variables to divide my dataset as
given in a categorical variable using randomForest.
Is randomForest() able to deal with count data?
Or is there no difference because only the ranks are used in the trees?
Thanks in advance
Birgit
Birgit Lemcke
Institut f?r
2006 Oct 02
1
finding correlation between two matrices
Dear all,
I would like to compare two distance matrices to find the correlation
between those and create a XY plot.could you please kindly help me and
let me know how I can do that using R.(Mantel test?).
Your help is very much appreciated!! Many thanks!
Regards,
Sima Fakheran
...............................................................
Sima Fakheran Esfahani
PhD Student
Institute of
2010 Jul 15
1
Warning message in summary of PGLM
Dear Sir,
When requesting the summary of pglm analyses in R, I encounter repeatedly
the following warning message:
"Warning message:
In pf(Fstat, object$k - 1, object$n - object$k, ncp = 0, lower.tail = FALSE,
:
full precision was not achieved in 'pnbeta'"
This message appears both with the pglm estimate of Lambda and with Lambda
set to 0.
Could you tell me what
2006 Mar 12
2
tapply with unequal length of arguments
Hi everyone,
Is it possible to use tapply(x,y,mean) if not all groups of x by y are
of the same length (for example if you have one missing observation)?
I tried tapply(x,y,mean,na.omit=T) but it doesn't work!
Steffi
--
---------------------------------
Stefanie von Felten
Doktorandin
ETH Z?rich
Institut f?r Pflanzenwissenschaften
ETH Zentrum, LFW A 2
Telefon: 044 632 85 97
Telefax: 044
2005 Mar 04
2
Clustering of Binary data in R
Good afternoon!
I would like to ask you about similarity measures and clustering in R for Binary data.
Would you please kindly help me and let me know about that commands in R?
Thanks in advance for your kind attentions.
I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible.
Best regards,
Sima
2008 May 05
1
Problems using rfImpute
Hello R-user!
I am running R 2.7.0 on a Power Book (Tiger). (I am still R and
statistics beginner)
I tried rfImpute (randomForest) and as far as I understood should it
replace NA`s using a proximity matrix:
> set.seed(100000)
> Subset5Imputed<-rfImpute(Sex~., data=Subset5)
ntree OOB 1 2
300: 11.78% 12.36% 11.21%
ntree OOB 1 2
300: 12.07% 12.64%
2006 Jan 19
1
empirical maximum likelihood estimation
Dear R-users
Problem:
Given the following system of ordinary differential euqations
dM/dt = (-n)*M-h*M
dS/dt = n*M-h*S+u*R
dA/dt = h*S-q*A
dI/dt = q*A-p*I
dJ/dt = h*M-v*J
dR/dt=p*I+v*J-u*R
where M,S,A,I,J,R are state variables and n,h,u,q,p,v parameters.
I'm able to calculate the likelihood value based on the solutions
M,S,A,I,J,R of the ODE's given the data, but without an explicit
2008 Apr 21
1
ANCOVA
R version 2.6.2 PowerBook G4
Hello R User,
I try to perform an ANCOVA using the glm function.
I have a dataset with continuous and categorical data (explanatory
variables) and my response variable is also binary categorical.
Fehler: NA/NaN/Inf in externem Funktionsaufruf (arg 4)
Zus?tzlich: Warning messages:
1: In Ops.factor(y, mu) : - nicht sinnvoll f?r Faktoren (makes no
sense for
2008 Apr 29
1
randomForest and ordered factors
Hello R-user!
I am running R 2.7.0 on a Power Book (Tiger). (I am still R and
statistics beginner)
I try to find the most important variables to divide my dataset as
given in a categorical variable.
code:
Test.rf4<-randomForest(Sex~.,na.action=na.roughfix, data=Subset4,
importance=TRUE, proximity=TRUE, ntree=10000, do.trace=1000,
keep.forest=FALSE)
My dataset contains also ordered
2008 Aug 11
1
Unwanted carriage returns storing dataframes with dbWriteTable
If I save a dataframe with a character-typed last column to a relational
database with dbWriteTable, the values in the last column of the
resulting table in the database will have a '\r' (carriage return)
appended. If I read back the dataframe with dbReadTable the last column
in the resulting dataframe has also '\r' appended (see protocol below).
Setting or unsetting sql-mode
2012 Sep 27
3
problem with nls starting values
Hi
I would like to fit a non-linear regression to the follwoing data:
quantiles<-c(seq(.05,.95,0.05))
slopes<-c( 0.000000e+00, 1.622074e-04 , 3.103918e-03 , 2.169135e-03 ,
9.585523e-04
,1.412327e-03 , 4.288103e-05, -1.351171e-04 , 2.885810e-04 ,-4.574773e-04
, -2.368968e-03, -3.104634e-03, -5.833970e-03, -6.011945e-03, -7.737697e-03
, -8.203058e-03, -7.809603e-03, -6.623985e-03,
2008 May 15
1
metaMDS using Dissimilarity matrix
Hello R-user community!
I am running R 2.7.0 on a Power Book (Tiger). (I am still R and
statistics beginner)
Presently I try to run the function metaMDS (vegan) using an existing
dissimilarity-matrix.
As I would like to start with this matrix I thought I could just give
the matrix using the x= -argument
Test<-metaMDS(x=Dist.Gower)
Fehler in inherits(comm, "dist") :
2020 Sep 22
3
R > 4.0.0 on Debian 9 Stretch?
Hi Dirk,
Thanks for the explamnayion - Debian is running in a VM (and nothing really installed on it) , and I think the easiest is for me just to install Debian 10 and to use that one.
Thanks a lot,
Rainer
> On 22 Sep 2020, at 15:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 22 September 2020 at 14:49, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> | I know this is likely
2001 Sep 08
1
t.test (PR#1086)
Full_Name: Menelaos Stavrinides
Version: 1.3. 1
OS: Windows 98
Submission from: (NULL) (193.129.76.90)
When model simplification is used in glm (binomial errors) and anova is used two
compare two competitive models one can use either an "F" or a "Chi" test.
R always performs an F test (Although when test="Chi" the test is labeled as
Chi, there isn't any
2020 Sep 22
2
R > 4.0.0 on Debian 9 Stretch?
Hi
I know this is likely documented somewhere, but I can?t find it. How can I install R > 4.0.0 on Debian 9 Stretch?
Thanks a lot,
Rainer
--
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)
Orcid ID: 0000-0002-7490-0066
Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies
University of Z?rich
Office Y34-J-74
2009 Dec 11
3
Correcting for missing data combinations
I can think of many brute-force ways to do this outside of R, but was
wondering if there was a simple/elegant solution within R instead.
I have a table that looks something like the following:
Factor1 Factor2 Value
A 11/11/2009 5
A 11/12/2009 4
B 11/11/2009 7
B 11/13/2009 8
>From that I need to generate all permutations of Factor1 and Factor2 and
force a 0 for any combination that doesn?t
2002 Nov 29
2
Obtaining the variable names of a glm object
Is names(model1$coef) what you're looking for?
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Cabrera [mailto:krcabrer at epm.net.co]
Sent: 29 November 2002 10:36
Cc: R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: [R] Obtaining the variable names of a glm object
Hi, R users!
Suppose I make a model like this:
2003 Mar 06
6
type III Sum Sq in ANOVA table - Howto?
Hello,
as far as I see, R reports type I sums of squares. I'd like to get R to
print out type III sums of squares.
e.g. I have the following model:
vardep~factor1*factor2
to get the type III sum of squares for factor1 I've tried
anova(lm(vardep~factor2+factor1:factor2),lm(vardep~factor1*factor2))
but that didn't yield the desired result.
Could anyone give me a hint how to proceed?