similar to: validates_format_of > Invalid regular expression with simple pattern

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "validates_format_of > Invalid regular expression with simple pattern"

2006 Jul 07
2
Problem with GetText 1.6.0 - undefined method ''N_''
I''m just upgraded GetText from 1.4.0 to 1.6.0, and all my tests got broken. I got this error: ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.3/lib/active_record/base.rb:1129:in `method_missing'': undefined method `N_'' for User:Class (NoMethodError) etc My model user.rb has this line: validates_format_of :login, :with => /^[a-zA-Z0-9_]+$/, :message =>
2010 Mar 31
3
regular expression help to extract specific strings from text
Dear all, Lets say I have the following: > x <- c("Eve: Going to try something new today...", "Adam: Hey @Eve, how are you finding R? #rstats", "Eve: @Adam, It's awesome, so much better at statistics that #Excel ever was! @Cain & @Able disagree though :(", "Adam: @Eve I'm sure they'll sort it out :)", "blahblah") > x [1]
2006 Feb 21
2
validates_format_of :url, regexp?
Hey, Does anybody have a regexp for validating URLs? I found this one and am trying to adapt it: ^(((ht|f)tp(s?))\:\/\/)?(www.|[a-zA-Z].)[a-zA-Z0-9\-\.]+\.(com|edu|gov|mil|net|org|biz|info|name|museum|us|ca|uk)(\:[0-9]+)*(/($|[a-zA-Z0-9\.\,\;\?\''\\\+&%\$#\=~_\-]+))*$ (http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Web_Languages/JavaScript/Q_21245168.html) I also found this one, but, um,
2007 Aug 07
2
Making Validations Optional
Hello, I am working with URL validations. I want this validation to be optional if the data exists in the form submission. I have tried several things. validates_format_of :website, :if => params[:organization][:website], :with => /((http|https):\/\/)?[a-z0-9]+([\-\.]{1}[a-z0-9]+)*\.[a-z] {2,5}(([0-9]{1,5})?\/.*)?/, :message => "Please enter a valid url" Of
2006 Jun 05
2
When adding a record in console, a parameter comes in as null even when I set it
In console, I am trying to create a User but the :account_id does not come in. Console just gives me back :account_id => nil. Obviously I''m trying to set it though. Silly console... But, I can set the account_id column in my controller like so: @user = User.new(params[:user]) @user.account_id = account.id @user.save Here''s what I give to the controller: User.create :name
2008 Feb 11
1
ctags support for puppet
This is a quick and dirty .ctags file that makes basic navigation possible with vim and ctags, great if you have multiple files: --langdef=puppet --langmap=puppet:.pp --regex-puppet=/^class[ \t]*([a-zA-Z0-9_\-]+)[ \t]*/\1/d,definition/ --regex-puppet=/^site[ \t]*([a-zA-Z0-9_\-]+)[ \t]*/\1/d,definition/ --regex-puppet=/^node[ \t]*([a-zA-Z0-9_\-]+)[ \t]*/\1/d,definition/ --regex-puppet=/^define[
2008 Jun 07
3
DRY validates_format_of?
In a model I have following validates_format_of. Is there an easy way to DRY this up? It seems to be rather repetitive. validates_format_of :expiration_date, :with => /^[0-9]{4}[-][0-9]{2}[-][0-9]{2}$/ validates_format_of :activation_date, :with => /^[0-9]{4}[-][0-9]{2}[-][0-9]{2}$/ validates_format_of :some_other_date, :with =>
2006 Apr 01
3
Syncpeople Plugin Scope Never Active
I installed the Syncpeople textmate bundle ( http://syncpeople.com/downloads/syncpeople_on_rails_features ) and the commands all work from the menu, but the short-cuts never work for any of the snippets or commands ever work, because the scopes are not being selected properly. If I change the scope to just "source.ruby" it will work fine. But I cannot see why their scope selectors do not
2005 Nov 28
4
validates_format_of nil
I''ve noticed that validates_format_of will return invalid if the field is nil. Question 1) How should we declare a validation that will validate it with a regex if it is set, but, if the field is not set, just move on Question 2) Why is it done this way? The other validators are only invoked if the field is set . If you want to declare the field mandatory, you add a
2006 Apr 05
4
validates_format_of ?
Hi all, I''ve got a form which accepts a "price" field and I''m attempting to validate it and allow some flexibility in the way the user enters it. It''s a numeric field but I want the user to be able to enter dollar signs and commas naturally in the data entry. I''m trying to understand how to use validates_format_of, and I''m not sure what
2007 Dec 05
5
Active Record, Migration, and Translation
Hi, I think the columns and table in migration should be able to have an optional "display_name" set manually. Something like: create_table :people, {display_name => "Personne"} do |t| t.column :first_name :string, :display_name => "Prénom". end Let me explain my point of view: Rails is a framework made to write programs in English. You see it when you
2008 Feb 24
1
validates_format_of no dots allowed
I need a validates_format_of that disallow dots. In the api there is nothing to find about how validates_format_of exatly works. Is there a better documentation or is there something that can tell me howto disallow dots. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
2012 Aug 14
3
validates_format_of :message not working, validates_length_of :message is working
I''m using validates_format_of and the validation I want to do works, but I can''t get an error message to be displayed if the data is invalid: validates_format_of :mobile, :with => /\A[\+0-9]+\Z/, :message => " - Wrong" I have another validation some where else that does display the error message: " - Name is too long" validates_length_of :name,
2006 Jan 25
24
RailsCron 0.2 plugin
I received feedback from some of you, saying that it would be cool if RailsCron was even easier to manage. So I implemented a graceful start/restart inside of the plugin''s init.rb. If you don''t like it, comment it out and send me the feedback. Also, I finished an update to RailsCron that allows you to attach asynchronous processing methods to your ActiveRecord models. i.e.:
2010 Jan 18
3
validates_format_of :phone,
validates_format_of :phone, :with => /\A\s*(?:(?:\+?(?:\d{1,3}(?:\s*|[\-.])))?\(?\d{3}[\-\/)]?\s*) (?:[2-9][0-9 \-.]{6,})\s*\z/, i pit it on my reuriments but error whlie entering 666.111.9999 i want it should be ok any one help me please -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to
2006 Jun 10
2
regex help
I am trying to write a model validates_format_of that will accept a field containing only certain characters. I want the field to only allow the following characters: a-z, A-Z, 0-9 and the ''_'', ''@'', ''.'' and ''-'' characters. I have hunted around a bit and came up with this: validates_format_of :password, :with =>
2017 Jan 23
2
Linking Linux kernel with LLD
Our tokenizer recognize [A-Za-z0-9_.$/\\~=+[]*?\-:!<>]+ as a token. gold uses more complex rules to tokenize. I don't think we need that much complex rules, but there seems to be room to improve our tokenizer. In particular, I believe we can parse the Linux's linker script by changing the tokenizer rules as follows.
2008 Oct 15
4
Small regular expression question
I''m looking to write a regular expression that will match valid URLs. My problem is that it almost works, except it accepts URLs with / in the middle of them, suchs as: http://www.ruby/rails.com It looks (to me) like my regular expression should not match strings like that, but it does. Here is the regular expression:
2009 Feb 28
7
be_valid (validates_format_of ..., :on => :create)
Greetings, How to write Example which will check if model''s variable''s format is valid using :on => :create, like this: class User < ActiveRecord::Base ... validates_format_of :email, :with => /.../, :on => :create ... Using following code is not right: it "should ..." do @user = users(:example_user) @user.email =
2017 Jan 24
5
Linking Linux kernel with LLD
>Our tokenizer recognize > > [A-Za-z0-9_.$/\\~=+[]*?\-:!<>]+ > >as a token. gold uses more complex rules to tokenize. I don't think we need that much complex rules, but there seems to be >room to improve our tokenizer. In particular, I believe we can parse the Linux's linker script by changing the tokenizer rules as >follows. > >