similar to: Random Forest

Hola, Me he iniciado hace poco en Machine Learning, y tengo una duda sobre mis conjuntos de datos: el primero tiene 37 variables explicativas y 116 instancias, y el segundo, 140 variables explicativas y 195 instancias. El primero lo veo bien, ya que hay 3 veces más casos que variables explicativas, pero creo que el segundo caso puede suponer un problema al haber casi el mismo número de

Dear R-users, While making a prediction using the randomForest function (package randomForest) I'm getting the following error message: "Error in predict.randomForest(model, newdata = CV) : No forest component in the object" Here's my complete code. For reproducing this task, please find my 2 data sets attached ( http://www.nabble.com/file/p17855119/data.rar data.rar ).

Dear mailinglist members, I was wondering if there was a way to re-evaluate the instances of a tree (in the forest) again after I have manually changed a splitpoint (or split variable) of a decision node. Here's an illustration: library("randomForest") forest.rf <- randomForest(formula = Species ~ ., data = iris, do.trace = TRUE, ntree = 3, mtry = 2, norm.votes = FALSE) # I am

Dear All, For a data mining project, I am relying heavily on the RandomForest and Party packages. Due to the large size of the data set, I have often memory problems (in particular with the Party package; RandomForest seems to use less memory). I really have two questions at this point 1) Please see how I am using the Party and RandomForest packages. Any comment is welcome and useful.

Hello, I'm trying to find out the optimal number of splits (mtry parameter) for a randomForest classification. The classification is binary and there are 32 explanatory variables (mostly factors with each up to 4 levels but also some numeric variables) and 575 cases. I've seen that although there are only 32 explanatory variables the best classification performance is reached when

Dear Researches, I am using RF (in regression way) for analize several metrics extract from image. I am tuning RF setting a loop using different range of mtry, tree and nodesize using the lower value of MSE-OOB mtry from 1 to 5 nodesize from1 to 10 tree from 1 to 500 using this paper as refery Palmer, D. S., O'Boyle, N. M., Glen, R. C., & Mitchell, J. B. O. (2007). Random Forest Models

Dear All, I am using randomForest to predict the final selling price of some items. As it often happens, I have a lot of (noisy) historical data, but the question is not so much about data cleaning. The dataset for which I need to carry out some predictions are fairly recent sales or even some sales that will took place in the near future. As a consequence, historical data should be somehow

Hello, I'm trying to create a series of randomForest objects, basically in a loop like this: forests <- list(); for (level in 1:10) { # do some other things here # create a random forest forest <- randomForest( x = x.level, y = z.level, ntree = trees ); forests <- c(forests, forest); } But instead of creating a list of 10 forests, this creates a list

Greetings. I'm trying to determine whether to use rpart or randomForest for a classification tree. Has anybody tested efficacy formally? I've run both and the confusion matrix for rf beats rpart. I've looking at the rf help page and am unable to figure out how to extract the tree. But more than that I'm looking for a more comprehensive user's guide for randomForest including

Dear R-helpers, I'm working on mass spectra in randomForest/R, and following the recommendations for the case of noisy variables, I don't want to use the default mtry (sqrt of nvariables), but I'm not sure up to which proportion mtry/nvariables it makes sense to increase mtry without "overtuning" RF. Let me tell my example: I have 106 spectra belonging to 4 classes, the

hello, I want to use randomForest to classify a matrix which is 331030?42,the last column is class signal.I use ? Memebers.rf<-randomForest(class~.,data=Memebers,proximity=TRUE,mtry=6,ntree=200) which told me" the error is matrix(0,n,n) set too elements" then I use: Memebers.rf<-randomForest(class~.,data=Memebers,importance=TRUE,proximity=TRUE) which told me"the error is

Hi All, My question is in regards to an error generated when using randomForest in R. Is there a special way to format the data in order to avoid this error, or am I completely confused on what the error implies? "Error in randomForest.default(m, y, ...) : Can not handle categorical predictors with more than 32 categories." This is generated from the command line: >

Hi, Can someone please offer me some guidance? I imported some data. One of the columns called "JOBTITLE" when imported was imported as a factor column with 416 levels. I subset the data in such a way that only 4 levels have data in "JOBTITLE" and tried running randomForest but it complained about "JOBTITLE" having more than 32 categories. I know that is the limit

Hi, dears, I am processing some data with 60 columns, and 286,730 rows. Most columns are numerical value, and some columns are categorical value. It turns out that: when ntree sets to the default value (500), it says "can not allocate a vector of 1.1 GB size"; And when I set ntree to be a very small number like 10, it will run for hours. I use the (x,y) rather than the (formula,data).

Hi, I would like to use a random Forest model to get an idea about which variables from a dataset may have some prognostic significance in a smallish study. The default for the number of trees seems to be 500. I tried changing the default to ntree=2000 or ntree=200 and the results appear identical. Have changed mtry from mtry=5 to mtry=6 successfully. Have seen same problem on both a Windows

Guys, I used Random Forest with a couple of data sets I had to predict for binary response. In all the cases, the AUC of the training set is coming to be 1. Is this always the case with random forests? Can someone please clarify this? I have given a simple example, first using logistic regression and then using random forests to explain the problem. AUC of the random forest is coming out to be

Dear R-users, I have a problem with randomForest{outlier}. After running the following code ( that produces a silly data set and builds a model with randomForest ): ####################### library(randomForest) set.seed(0) ## build data set X <- rbind( matrix( runif(n=400,min=-1,max=1), ncol = 10 ) , rep(1,times= 10 ) ) Y <- matrix( nrow = nrow(X), ncol = 1) for( i in (1:nrow(X))){

Si, Carlos. Yo hago lo mismo, pero esos mismos numeritos salen enormes. > treesize(RFfit) [1] 4304 4302 4311 4319 4343 4298 4298 4311 4349 4327 4331 4317 4294 4321 4283 4362 [17] 4300 4330 4266 4331 4308 4352 4294 4315 4372 4349 4331 4347 4329 4348 4298 4335 [33] 4346 4396 4345 4313 4293 4276 4353 4272 4304 4325 4317 4336 4308 4351 4374 4324 [49] 4386 4359 4311 4346 4300

(Sorry for the cross-post--- I wasn't sure which list is more appropriate...) Hi everyone, I've run into segfaults when using my randomForest package on large dataset (e.g., 100 x 15200) and large number of trees (e.g., ntree=7000 and mtry=3000). I'm wondering if anyone can give me some hints on where to look for the problem. The randomForest package mainly consists of two things:

(Sorry for the cross-post--- I wasn't sure which list is more appropriate...) Hi everyone, I've run into segfaults when using my randomForest package on large dataset (e.g., 100 x 15200) and large number of trees (e.g., ntree=7000 and mtry=3000). I'm wondering if anyone can give me some hints on where to look for the problem. The randomForest package mainly consists of two things: