Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "binom.test() query"
2003 Jan 22
2
small bug in binom.test?
Hi all,
I am wondering whether there is a small bug in the binom.test function of
the ctest library (I'm using R 1.6.0 on windows 2000, but Splus 2000 seems
to have the same behaviour). Or perhaps I've misunderstood something.
the command binom.test(11,100,p=0.1) and binom.test(9,100,p=0.1) give
different p-values (see below). As 9 and 11 are equidistant from 10, the
mean of the
2009 Feb 05
1
Incorrect p value for binom.test?
I believe the binom.test procedure is producing one tailed p values
rather than the two tailed value implied by the alternative hypothesis
language. A textbook and SAS both show 2*9.94e-07 = 1.988e-06 as the
two tailed value. As does the R summation syntax from R below. It
looks to me like the alternative hypothesis language should be revised
to something like " ... greater than or equal
2012 Aug 20
1
The difference between chisq.test binom.test and pbinom
Hello all,
I am trying to understand the different results I am getting from the
following 3 commands:
chisq.test(c(62,50), p = c(0.512,1-0.512), correct = F) # p-value = 0.3788
binom.test(x=62,n=112, p= 0.512) # p-value = 0.3961
2*(1-pbinom(62,112, .512)) # p-value = 0.329
Well, the binom.test was supposed to be "exact" and give the same results
as the pbinom, while the chisq.test
2006 Feb 03
5
pbinom with size argument 0 (PR#8560)
Full_Name: Uffe H?gsbro Thygesen
Version: 2.2.0
OS: linux
Submission from: (NULL) (130.226.135.250)
Hello all.
pbinom(q=0,size=0,prob=0.5)
returns the value NaN. I had expected the result 1. In fact any value for q
seems to give an NaN. Note that
dbinom(x=0,size=0,prob=0.5)
returns the value 1.
Cheers,
Uffe
2006 Oct 19
5
binom.test
R-experts:
A quick question, please.
>From a lab exp, I got 12 positives out of 50.
To get 90% CI for this , I think binom.test might be the one to be used.
Is there a better way or function to calculate this?
> binom.test(x=12, n=50, p=12/50, conf.level = 0.90)
Exact binomial test
data: 12 and 50
number of successes = 12, number of trials = 50, p-value = 1
alternative
2005 Aug 27
2
two-tailed exact binomail test
I am trying to find a definition for the two-tailed exact binomial test but have been unsuccessful. Can you help?
---------------------------------
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2002 Mar 22
1
binom.test and small N
running R 1.4.1 on MAC and 1.2.2 on Linux
When I use run binom.test with small N the results are a little
perplexing to me
>binom.test(9,20,p=0.5)
gives the below plus other stuff
95 percent confidence interval:
0.2305779 0.6847219
Now:
>pbiom(9,20,0.6847219)
[1] 0.02499998 # i.e., lower 2.5% of distribution
>pbinom(9,20,0.2305779)
[1] 0.9923132
>pbinom(8,20,0.2305779)
2009 Jan 05
2
Sweave data-figure coupling
Hi,
With the following Sweave minimal file:
---<--------------------cut here---------------start------------------->---
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{Sweave}
\begin{document}
<<binom-sim>>=
thetas <- seq(0, 1, by=0.001)
prior <- rep(1, length(thetas)) / length(thetas)
lik <- dbinom(1, 1, thetas)
lik.p <- prior * lik
post <- lik.p / sum(lik.p)
2006 Mar 22
4
pbinom( ) function (PR#8700)
Full_Name: Chanseok Park
Version: R 2.2.1
OS: RedHat EL4
Submission from: (NULL) (130.127.112.89)
pbinom(any negative value, size, prob) should be zero.
But I got the following results.
I mean, if a negative value is close to zero, then pbinom() calculate
pbinom(0, size, prob). dbinom() also behaves similarly.
> pbinom( -2.220446e-22, 3,.1)
[1] 0.729
> pbinom( -2.220446e-8, 3,.1)
2020 May 18
3
dbinom link
In principle a good idea, but I'm not sure the whereabouts of Catherine Loader are known at this point. Last peeps from her on the net seem to be about a decade old.
.pd
> On 18 May 2020, at 10:31 , Abby Spurdle <spurdle.a at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This has come up before.
>
> Here's the last time:
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2019-March/077478.html
2006 Oct 11
2
expression as a parameter of binom.test (PR#9288)
Full_Name: Petr Savicky
Version: 2.4.0
OS: Fedora Core release 2
Submission from: (NULL) (62.24.91.47)
the error is
> binom.test(0.56*10000,10000)
Error in binom.test(0.56 * 10000, 10000) :
'x' must be nonnegative and integer
while
> binom.test(5600,10000)
yields correct result.
The same error occurrs for
> binom.test(0.57*10000,10000)
2002 Sep 22
3
binom.test()
Hello everybody.
Does anyone else find the last test in the following sequence odd?
Can anyone else reproduce it or is it just me?
> binom.test(100,200,0.13)$p.value
[1] 2.357325e-36
> binom.test(100,200,0.013)$p.value
[1] 6.146546e-131
> binom.test(100,200,0.0013)$p.value
[1] 1.973702e-230
> binom.test(100,200,0.00013)$p.value
[1] 0.9743334
(R 1.5.1, Linux RedHat 7.1)
--
2000 Oct 02
2
binom.test bug?
R. 1.1.0
The example below is self explanatory.
## 1 ## # works fine
> binom.test((50*.64),50,.5,alt='g')
... Exact binomial test ...
## 2 ## # WHAT ! ?
> binom.test((50*.65),50,.5,alt='g')
Error in binom.test((50 * 0.65), 50, 0.5, alt = "g") :
x must be an
2010 Mar 13
1
What can I use instead of ks.test for the binomial distribution ?
Hello all,
A friend just showed me how ks.test fails to work with pbinom for small
"size".
Example:
x<-rbinom(10000,10,0.5)
x2<-rbinom(10000,10,0.5)
ks.test(x,pbinom,10,0.5)
ks.test(x,pbinom,size = 10, prob= 0.5)
ks.test(x,x2)
The tests gives significant p values, while the x did come from
binom with size = 10 prob = 0.5.
What test should I use instead ?
Thanks,
Tal
2001 Jun 09
1
AW: binom.test appropriate?
No,
since I'd like to test
null: p <= p0
alternative: p > p0.
and my understanding is that binom.test tests
null: p = p0 (can only be a "simple" null hypothesis
according to help(binom.test))
alternative: p > p0 (or p < p0 or p != p0).
Thanks, Mirko.
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Douglas Bates [mailto:bates at stat.wisc.edu]
>
2020 May 18
2
dbinom link
FWIW the link from ?dbinom to the Loader paper on Binomials is broken but the paper seems to be
available here: https://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/attachment/3829107/0/loader2000Fast.pdf
Roger Koenker
r.koenker at ucl.ac.uk<mailto:r.koenker at ucl.ac.uk>
Honorary Professor of Economics
Department of Economics, UCL
Emeritus Professor of Economics
and Statistics, UIUC
[[alternative
2006 Dec 17
1
fischer.test help
Um texto embutido e sem conjunto de caracteres especificado associado...
Nome: n?o dispon?vel
Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20061217/91002ee1/attachment.pl
2008 Aug 21
1
pnmath compilation failure; dylib issue?
(1) ...need to speed up a monte-carlo sampling...any suggestions about
how I can get R to use all 8 cores of a mac pro would be most useful
and very appreciated...
(2) spent the last few hours trying to get pnmath to compile under os-
x 10.5.4...
using gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5553) as downloaded from
CRAN, xcode 3.0...
...xcode 3.1 installed over top of above after
1999 Jan 28
1
bug in the ctest package: binom.test
R 0630 for windows
> library(ctest)
> binom.test(7,10,p=0.3, alternative="two.sided")
returns a p-value of =< 2.2e-016 and a warning
In Splus 3.4
> binom.test(7,10,p=0.3, alternative="two.sided")
returns a p-value of 0.0106
I think it is the
max(v[v<=(1+eps)*PVAL]) causing the problem...
max() of an empty vector.......
Mai Z
2018 Mar 13
2
importing namespaces from base packages
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch>
wrote:
> [...]
> Is that so? Not according to my reading of the 'Writing R
> Extensions' manual, nor according to what I have been doing in
> all of my packages for ca. 2 years:
>
> The rule I have in my mind is
>
> 1) NAMESPACE Import(s|From) \
>