similar to: factor documentation issue

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "factor documentation issue"

2011 Feb 14
2
How to get warning about implicit factor to integer coercion?
Is there a way in R (12.x) to avoid the implicit coercion of factors to integers in the context of subscripts? If this is not possible, is there a way to get at least a warning, if any coercion of this type happens, given that the action of this coercion is almost never what is wanted? Of course, in the rare case that as.integer() is applied explicitly onto a factor, the warning is not needed,
2005 Sep 29
1
plot.augPred sorted and labelled according second factor
Hi using this code example: library(nlme) fm1 <- lme(Orthodont, random = ~1) plot(augPred(fm1)) is there any way to have the plots in each cell labelled and ordered according to Orthodont$Sex? I.e. in addition to the bar with the label for Orthodont$Subject there is another bar labelling the Sex of the subject? thanks a lot christoph --
2009 Aug 05
4
multiple lty on same panel in xyplot
I would like to use lattice graphics to plot multiple functions (or groups or subpopulations) on the same plot region, using different line types "lty" or colors "col" to distinguish the functions (or groups). In traditional graphics, this seems straightforward: First plot all the data using 'type="n"', and subsequently execute a series of "points"
2009 Sep 04
1
Problem with locfit( ... , family="hazard")
I'm having difficulties with plot.locfit.3d, at least I think that is the problem. I have a large dataframe (about 4 MM cases) and was hoping to see a non-parametric estimate of the hazard plotted against two variables: > fit <- locfit(~surv.yr+ ur_protein + ur_creatinine, data=TRdta, cens = 1-death, family = "hazard", xlim=c(0,10)) # it took somewhere between 1 and 2
2004 Aug 18
3
Revert a factor to its numeric values
I'm trying a recommendation on the help page for 'factor': > x <- c(1, 2, 1, 2) > x <- factor(x, labels = c("one", "two")) > x [1] one two one two Levels: one two > as.numeric(levels(x))[x] [1] NA NA NA NA Warning message: NAs introduced by coercion Also, > as.numeric(as.character(x)) [1] NA NA NA NA Warning message: NAs introduced by
2003 Aug 22
2
converting factor to numeric
Hola! The R FAQ says: 7.12 How do I convert factors to numeric? It may happen that when reading numeric data into R (usually, when reading in a file), they come in as factors. If f is such a factor object, you can use as.numeric(as.character(f)) to get the numbers back. More efficient, but harder to remember, is as.numeric(levels(f))[as.integer(f)] In any case, do not call as.numeric()
2011 Jul 29
2
converting factor to numeric gives "NAs introduced by coercion"
Hi, I have a dataframe that I imported from a .txt file by: skogTemp <- read.delim2("Skogaryd_shoot_data.txt", header=TRUE, fill=TRUE) and the data are factors, how can avoid factors from the beginning? Although the file contains both characters and numbers. I tried to convert some of the columns from factor to numeric and as I understood it you can not use only as.numeric but
2013 Mar 09
2
quesion about lm function
Hi all: My data is in the attachment. I want to analysis the mean difference of y between 2 sex. My code: result_lm<-lm(y~factor(sex) + x1 + x2) summary(result_lm) The result of "factor(sex)m" 136.83, is the mean difference of y between 2 sex,and the corresponding p value is 0.07618. My question is: how to get the mean y of sex(m) and sex(f) respectively via lm function? Many
2012 Jun 07
1
factor coercion with read.csv or read.table
How do I fix this error ? I tried coercion to a vector but that didn't work. msci <-read.csv("..MSCIexUS.csv", header=TRUE) head(msci) Date index 1 Dec 31, 1969 100 2 Jan 30, 1970 97.655 3 Feb 27, 1970 96.154 4 Mar 31, 1970 95.857 5 Apr 30, 1970 85.564 6 May 29, 1970 79.005 > str(msci) 'data.frame': 510 obs. of 2 variables: $ Date : Factor w/ 510
2012 Jul 19
2
problem with using apply for dataframe
Dear people, I am including an example of a dataframe: mydataframe<-data.frame(X=c(1:4),total_bill=c(16.99,10.34,21.01,23.68),tip=c(1.01,1.66,3.50,3.31),sex=c("Male","Male","Male","Female")) When I use the sapply function getting the information about the factors works: sapply(mydataframe,function(x)is.factor(x)) X total_bill tip
2013 Apr 20
1
Assigning factor to character vector
Hi! Yesterday I accidentally discovered this: > a <- LETTERS[1:5] > a [1] "A" "B" "C" "D" "E" > > a[1] <- factor(a[1]) > a [1] "1" "B" "C" "D" "E" BUT: > b <- factor(LETTERS[1:5]) > b [1] A B C D E Levels: A B C D E > b[1] <- factor(b[1]) > b [1] A B C D E
2005 Sep 20
2
How to exclude a level from a factor
Hi, I could not use 'exlcude=' option in factor() to exclude a level from a existing factor. x is a factor: > x [1] a b c Levels: a b c > factor(x,exclude="c") [1] a b c Levels: a b c Warning message: NAs introduced by coercion However, "c" is not coded as NA. The following does not work either: >
2016 Sep 02
2
Coercion of 'exclude' in function 'factor' (was 'droplevels' inappropriate change)
I am basically fine with the change. How about using just the following? if(!is.character(exclude)) exclude <- as.vector(exclude, typeof(x)) # may result in NA x <- as.character(x) It looks simpler and is, more or less, equivalent. In factor.Rd, in description of argument 'exclude', "(when \code{x} is a \code{factor} already)" can be removed. A larger
2006 Jan 13
1
Variance-covariance by factor
Dear all, I have a data frame with one factor and four numeric variables and wish to obtain the var-cor matrix separately by factor. I tried by() and sapply() but getting nowhere. I understand this can be done by subsetting the dataframe, but there should have some sleek ways of doing it. Here is a simulated dataframe; s <- rep(c("A","B","C"), c(25,22,18)) d
2008 Aug 16
1
ANCOVA: Next steps??
Having spent the last few weeks trying to decipher R, I feel I may finally be getting somewhere, but i'M still in need of some advice and all my tutors seem to be on holiday! Basically a bit of background, I have data collected on a population of Lizards which includes age,sex, and body condition. I collected data myself this year and I have data previously collected from 1999, 2002 and
2006 Feb 21
8
Validations continued
I simply can''t figure this out. I have been reading and re-reading Agile book and wiki.rubyonrails.org - all sorts of validation methods and still, it doesn''t work. Controller code def create @client = Client.new(params[:client]) if @client.save! flash[:notice] = ''Client was successfully created.'' redirect_to :action =>
2010 Apr 29
3
convert Factor as numeric
Dear group, I know this issue has been already covered, and before you reply I must say I have read the R-FAQ and search the mailing list archive. I still can't manage to change my factor to numeric as I couldn't find any clear answer. Here is my df : Pose1 <- structure(list(DESCRIPTION = structure(c(1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 8L), .Label = c(" SUGAR NO.11 May/10 ", "COTTON
2011 Feb 10
1
about prediction with a factor
Hi, I don't know how to make prediction with a factor in the linear model. Say yd=c(1,2,3,4,5) > sl=c(2,3,4,5,6) > sex=c("male","male","female","female","male") > sex=factor(sex) > m=lm(sl~yd+sex+sex:yd) How to make a prediction with new data like yd=c(4,5,6,7,8) for male and female separately ? Thank you very
2007 Jul 09
2
ANOVA: Does a Between-Subjects Factor belong in the Error Term?
I am executing a Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance with 1 DV (LOCOMOTOR RESPONSE), 2 Within-Subjects Factors (AGE, ACOUSTIC CONDITION), and 1 Between-Subjects Factor (SEX). Does anyone know whether the between-subjects factor (SEX) belongs in the Error Term of the aov or not? And if it does belong, where in the Error Term does it go? The 3 possible scenarios are listed below: e.g., 1.
2003 Feb 10
1
Factor level comparisons in lme
Hello, I''m trying to fit a linear mixed effects model of the form: lme(y ~ x * Sex * Year, random=x|subject) where Sex and Year are factors with two and three levels respectively. I want to compare the fixed effects for each level to the overall mean, but the default in R is to compare to the first level. This can be changed by adding the term -1 to the righthand side of the model