similar to: tree()

Dear useRs, What is the syntax to obtain survival curves for single strata on many subjects? I have a model based on Surv(time,response) object, so there is a single row per subject and no start,stop and no switching of strata. The newdata has many subjects and each subject has a strata and the survival based on the subject risk and the subject strata is needed. If I do newpred <-

Dear R-devel, utils::isS3stdGeneric tries to subset the body of the function it's fed, primitives don't like that because they don't have a body, identity doesn't like it either because it's body is a symbol. According to the doc, any function is a legal input. See below: identity #> function (x) #> x #> <bytecode: 0x0000000013d6da28> #> <environment:

>>>>> Gabriel Becker writes: > I added that so I can look at the proposed fix and put it or something > similar in bugzilla for review final review. > Apologies for the oversight. Fixed now with - while(as.character(bdexpr[[1L]]) == "{") + while(is.call(bdexpr) && (as.character(bdexpr[[1L]]) == "{")) (the suggested fix does not work on

Trace adds something to the body of the function, so it does make sense that it doesn't. Whether traced functions still technically meet the definition of standard s3 generic or not is, I suppose, up for debate, but I would say that they should, I think. As before, if desired I can work on a patch for this if desired, or someone on R-core can just take care of it if that is easier. Best, ~G

Hi all! I have written some code in C for simulating the fate of population using a dll loaded in R. During this simulation the population may go extinct such that the length of its trajectory is unknown beforehand. I wonder there is a way to define the size of the result in C and make it known to R to get the vector appropriately. I have defined the output size very much larger than

Hi, I am doing kernel density plots, and am trying to make the lines thicker. I comparing three groups, in sm.density.compare. I tried changing lwd to make the line sthicker right on the density compare call, but was not able to do it. There is not an option in sm.options to specify line thickness, as well as cex.ylab or cex.xlab- I tried it and it does not change the thickness of the lines.

Hello List, I'm running a ping command to monitor our connection to the Internet. Around yesterday, I was getting a lot of (DUP!) text on the replies. Would anyone know what that means? -- Stand before it and there is no beginning. Follow it and there is no end. Stay with the ancient Tao, Move with the present.

Dear R-user, I am trying to use the R "nlme" function to fit a non linear mixed effects model. The model I wand to fit is an individual somatic growth model with 4 parameters. For all parameters both fixed and random effects have to be estimated, as well as their covariance matrix (see the formula bellow). The data are simulated with the same growth model as in the nlme, with know

I added that so I can look at the proposed fix and put it or something similar in bugzilla for review final review. Apologies for the oversight. ~G On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:40 PM Antoine Fabri <antoine.fabri at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear R-devel, > > utils::isS3stdGeneric tries to subset the body of the function it's fed, > primitives don't like that because they

Should it work on traced functions ? As it is now it doesn't. Best, Antoine Le jeu. 20 ao?t 2020 ? 09:58, Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik at wu.ac.at> a ?crit : > >>>>> Gabriel Becker writes: > > > I added that so I can look at the proposed fix and put it or something > > similar in bugzilla for review final review. > > > Apologies for the

Hi R-mailing list I would have the following set-up below with a simplified data-frame. Through a loop which includes certain criteria for the densities I would like to plot the different density-distributions in the same plot. Of course I hope I don't do any mistakes with all the indexes of the dataframe. All I would like to have is the different densities in the same plot with a general

Hi all, I have a patch that fixes this and also fixes/improves debugcall so that it supports pkg::fun(obj) and pkg:::fun(obj) style calls. I'm going to test it a bit more and add a regression test for isS3stdGeneric and then I will submit it to bugzilla tonight or tomorrow morning. Best, ~G On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 5:28 PM Gabriel Becker <gabembecker at gmail.com> wrote: > Trace

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rss:/etc # 358C written rss:/etc # man mount Reformatting mount(8), please wait... MOUNT(8) Linux Programmer's Manual MOUNT(8) NAME mount - mount a file system SYNOPSIS mount [-lhV] mount -a [-fFnrsvw] [-t vfstype] mount [-fnrsvw] [-o options [,...]] device | dir mount [-fnrsvw] [-t vfstype] [-o options] device dir

I was running 1.9.18p10 on a test DEC Unix 4.0d box here and I decided to give 2.0beta3 a try. For some reason, I cannot connect to any of the server's shares or even get a list of it's services (via Start->Run->\\server) from Win95 clients. It asks for a password and no matter what I put in there I get "The password is not correct. Try again." I configured Beta3 a la:

Hi, Sean: I'm sorry I lie. I didn't mean to lie. I did try to avoid making a *BIG* change to the IPO pass-ordering for now. However, when I make a minor change to populateLTOPassManager() by separating module-pass and non-module-passes, I saw quite a few performance difference, most of them are degradations. Attacking these degradations one by one in a piecemeal manner is wasting

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only

hello every one, How to function more than one loop in R? I have the following problem to be solved with the a method of three loops, can you help me please? The data is attached with this message. The data is composed of two parts, cleaved (denoted by ?cleaved?) and non cleaved (denoted by ?noncleaved?). ? to access to the ith peptide, you can use X$Peptide[i] ? to access to the ith label,

P_STREAM can get more than 4GMb/s for the receive side, and more than 5GMb/= s for the send side. Is it the result from the raw socket or through tap? I want to duplicate such performance with vhost on my side. I can only get = more than 1GMb/s with following conditions: 1) disabled the GRO feature in the host 10G NIC driver 2) vi->big_packet in guest is false 3) MTU is 1500. 4) raw socket, not

P_STREAM can get more than 4GMb/s for the receive side, and more than 5GMb/= s for the send side. Is it the result from the raw socket or through tap? I want to duplicate such performance with vhost on my side. I can only get = more than 1GMb/s with following conditions: 1) disabled the GRO feature in the host 10G NIC driver 2) vi->big_packet in guest is false 3) MTU is 1500. 4) raw socket, not

cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- www.valinux.com VA Linux Systems gcarter_at_valinux.com www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: