similar to: multinom(nnet) analogy for biglm package?

In R, is there an automatic variable that stores the results of the most recent command or commands? (I am thinking of a behavior like Mathematica's % result-history substitution syntax.) (I am using R 2.3.1 on Linux and R 2.3.1 on Windows XP.) This is a pretty basic question, so I tried to do an extensive version of the recommended pre-posting homework. >

I want to get the logLik to calculate McFadden.R2 ,ML.R2 and Cragg.Uhler.R2, but the value from multinom does not have logLik.So my quetion is : is logLik meaningful to multinomial logistic model from multinom?If it does, how can I get it? Thank you! ps: I konw VGAM has function to get the multinomial logistic model with logLik, but I prefer use the function from "official" R

Hello, I apologize if this seems like an obvious question, but I have been looking everywhere and have yet to find an answer. I am doing a multinomial regression with multinom() in the nnet package. I have a 3 level ordered response (ordered()) variable and 4 predictors, 3 of which are numerical and one which is an ordered factor (also ordered()) with 5 levels (a, b, c, d, e). My question is in

Dear All: I am interested in multinomial logit models (function multinon, library nnet) but I'm having troubles in choose whether to define the predictors as factors or not. I had posted earlier this example (thanks for the reply ronggui): worms<- data.frame(year= rep(2000:2004, c(3,3,3,3,3)),age=rep(1:3,5),

Another issue that I found was that I cannot write to CIFS shares on a Windows server with Centos 6. I can write to them from Centos 5 and older Fedora versions, but not from Centos 6. Any ideas on what needs to be changed or where I can start looking for some indication of what is wrong? Thank you, Ryan Palamara ZAIS Group, LLC 2 Bridge Avenue, Suite 322 Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 Phone: (732)

Dear All. I have the following table that I want to analyze using multinom function freq segments sample 4271 Seg1 tumour 4311 Seg2 tumour 3515 Seg1 normal 3561 Seg2 normal I want to compare model with both factors to the one where only sample is present. model1=multinom(freq~segments+sample,data=table) model2=multinom(freq~ sample,data=table)

Dear R users, The nnet package includes the multinom method for the confint function. The R Help file (?confint) for the generic function in the stats package and the help files for the glm and nls methods in the MASS package indicate that one can use the "parm" argument as "a specification of which parameters are to be given confidence intervals, either a vector of numbers or

I am trying to find out why my group names are showing as nobody. I have a CentOS 6 system that is acting as a NFS server. I have some older fedora clients where the group name shows up fine, but newer CentOS 6 clients have the group name for NFS mounts show up as "nobody". The username shows up fine but the group name shows up as "nobody". I have tried changing some setting

Hello, I use nnet to do prediction for a continuous variable. after that, I calculate correlation coefficient between predicted value and real observation. I run my code(see following) several time, but I get different correlation coefficient each time. Anyone know why? In addition, How to calculate prediction accuracy for prediction of continuous variable? Aimin thanks, > m.nn.omega

Running a binary logit model on the data df <- data.frame(y=sample(letters[1:3], 100, repl=T), x=rnorm(100)) reveals some residual deviance: summary(glm(y ~ ., data=df, family=binomial("logit"))) However, running a multinomial model on that data (multinom, nnet) reveals a residual deviance: summary(multinom(y ~ ., data=df)) On page 203, the MASS book says that "here the

I am trying to create a LaTex table based on a multinom (nnet) object using the stargazer command. I have created a small data frame to demonstration the problem: data <- data.frame(age=1:21, hight=20:40, ed=c(1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3)) data$ed <- as.factor(data$ed) I then make a multinomial model using the command multinom from the nnet package: model <- multinom(ed ~

Hi, I found that using different contrasts (e.g. contr.helmert vs. contr.treatment) will generate different fitted probabilities from multinomial logistic regression using multinom(); while the fitted probabilities from binary logistic regression seem to be the same. Why is that? and for multinomial logisitc regression, what contrast should be used? I guess it's helmert? here is an example

Hi: I'm working with multinomial models with library nnet, and I'm trying to get the explained deviance (pseudo R^2) of my models. I am assuming that: pseudo R^2= 1 - dev(model) / dev (null) where dev(model) is the deviance for the fitted model and dev(null) is the deviance for the null model (with the intercept only). library(nnet) full.model<- multinom(cbind(factor1,

DeaR useRs: I am looking for a function which fits a multinomial model and in Baron?s page I find the function "multinom" in package "nnet" but this package is deprecated. I suppose that this function is now in other package but I can't find it. Can you help me? Thanks.

Hi, I am trying to specify a multinomial logit model using the multinom function from the nnet package. Now I add another independent variable and it halves the AIC as given by summary(multinom()). But when I call Anova(multinom()) from the car package, it tells me that this added variable is insignificant (Pr(>Chisq)=0.39). Thus, the improved AIC suggests to keep the variable but the Anova

Hi all, I'm working on a multinomial (or "polytomous") logistic regression using R and have made great progress using multinom() from the nnet library. My response variable has three categories, and there are two different possible predictors. I'd like to use the likelihoods of certain models (ie, saturated, fitteds, and null) to calculate Nagelkerke R-squared values for

Hola todos Cuando realizo las predicciones del modelo multinomial con el paquete nnet, estas cambian cada vez que lo ejecuto ... saben por qué pasa esto ?? Gracias por la ayuda. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I am looking into using the multinomial logistic regression option in the nnet library and have two questions about formatting the data. 1. Can data be analysed in the following format or does it need to be transformed into count data, such as the housing data in MASS? Id Crime paranoia hallucinate toc disorg crimhist age 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 25 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 37 3 1 1 0 1 1 0 42 4 3 0

Hi, I am working on a project which needs a multinomial logit regression. So I want to reference the code of multinom in nnet package. I found nnet package is no longer in the CRAN list. But I cannot find the source code in R Core source code package either. Anyone knows how to see the source code of nnet? Luo

Best R Help, I like to estimate a Multinomial Logit Model with 10 Classes. The problem is that the number of observations differs a lot over the 10 classes: Class | num. Observations A | 373 B | 631 C | 171 D | 700 E | 87 F | 249 G | 138 H | 133 I | 162 J | 407 Total: 3051 Where my data looks like: x1 x2 x3 x4 Class 1 1,02 2 1 A 2 7,2 1 5 B 3 4,2 1 4 H 1 4,1 1 8 F 2 2,4 3 7 D 1 1,2 0 4 J 2 0,9