similar to: sorting by name

Hi, I am trying to do a repeated measures ANOVA to determine if there is a significant difference between two sets of timecourse data. Each individual was given a single treatment and then measured for one variable for 10 days. Here is made-up example of what my data would look like:

Hi, I have been having some trouble using aov to do an anova, probably because I'm not understanding how to use this function correctly. For some reason it always tells me that "Estimated effects may be unbalanced", though I'm not sure what this means. Is the formula I am using written incorrectly? Below is the code I am using along with the data: > my.data response

Hi, I have the response variable 'Y' and four predictors say X1, X2, X3 and X4. Assuming all the assmptions like Y follows normal distribution etc. hold and I want to run linear multiple regression. How do I run the stepwise regression (forward as well as the backward regression). >From other software (i.e. minitab), I know only X1 and X2 are significant so my regression equation

I would like to run a loop in R. I have never done this before, so I would be very grateful for your help ! 1. I have a sample set: 25 objects. I would like to draw 1 object from it and use it as a test set for my future external validation. The remaining 24 objects I would like to use as a training set (to select a model). I would like to repeat this process until all 25 objects are used as a

Hi, I am experiencing a baffling behaviour of stepAIC(), and I hope to get any advice/help on what went wrong or I'd missed. I greatly appreciate any advice given. I am using stepAIC() to, say, select a model via stepwise selection method. R Version : 1.7.1 Windows ME Many thanks and best regards, Siew-Leng ***Issue : When stepAIC() is placed within a function, it seems

Hello Lady or Sir, I want to do model selection with 'step' function. But there is a trouble to me. For example, there are 5 independent variables, X0,X1,X2,X3 and X4; and 1 dependent variable y. I want to run stepwise regression y ~ X0 + X1 + X2 + X3 + X4, and I want to keep X0 always in the model. Every time when I run command 'step' with 'keep', error information

Hello all, I am trying to do factorial regression using lm() like this (example): model<-lm(y ~ x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x1*x2*x3*x4) The final term 'x1*x2*x3*x4' adds all possible interactions between explanatory variables to the model. i.e. x1:x2, x1:x2:x3, etc, etc. Now, the issue is that some of the interactions are significant and some are not. I can manually remove

SImplify your call to lm using the "." argument instead of manipulating formulas. > strt <- lm(y1 ~ ., data = dat) and you do not need to explicitly specify the "1+" on the rhs for lm, so > frm2<-as.formula(paste(trg," ~ ", paste(xvars,collapse = "+"))) works fine, too. Anyway, doing this gives (but see end of output)" bst <-

Dear R-Users, I have a problem with an algorithm that iteratively goes over a data.frame and exclude n-columns each step based on a statistical criterion. So that the 'column-space' gets smaller and smaller with each iteration (like when you do stepwise regression). The problem is that in every round I use a new subset of my data.frame. However, as soon as I "generate" this

Dear all, I have been trying to investigate the behaviour of different weights in weighted regression for a dataset with lots of missing data. As a start I simulated some data using the following: library(MASS) N <- 200 sigma <- matrix(c(1, .5, .5, 1), nrow = 2) sim.set <- as.data.frame(mvrnorm(N, c(0, 0), sigma)) colnames(sim.set) <- c('x1', 'x2') # x1 & x2 are

Greetings, I am interested in creating a stepwise fixed order regression function. There's a function for this already called add1( ). The F statistics are calculated using type 2 anova (the SS and the F changes don't match SPSS's). You can see my use of this at the very end of the email. What I want: a function to make an anova table with f changes and delt R^2. I ran into

I try to reproduce the SAS proc reg stepwise model selection procedure in R, but the only function I found was "step" which select new variables based on AIC. The SAS procedure I use add a new variable to the model based on F statistics and a pre defined significant level. Then before any new variables are added variables in the model that not meet F statistics at the significant level

Failed? What was the error message? Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Stephen O'hagan <SOhagan at manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > I'm trying to use boot.stepAIC for

The error is "the model fit failed in 50 bootstrap samples Error: non-character argument" Cheers, SOH. On 22/08/2017 17:52, Bert Gunter wrote: > Failed? What was the error message? > > Cheers, > > Bert > > > Bert Gunter > > "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along > and sticking things into it." > -- Opus (aka

Dear all I want to run a simple multiple linear regression model, say: mod <- lm(y~x1+x2+x3+x4) I have programmed a custom algorithm to calculate the p-values, because there is clustering present. I ordered the variables according to their p-value and want to stepwise eliminate the variables with the highest p-values. My question: How can I use "update" when I have only the

I'm using the package 'lars' in R with the following code: > library(lars) > set.seed(3) > n <- 1000 > x1 <- rnorm(n) > x2 <- x1+rnorm(n)*0.5 > x3 <- rnorm(n) > x4 <- rnorm(n) > x5 <- rexp(n) > y <- 5*x1 + 4*x2 + 2*x3 + 7*x4 + rnorm(n) > x <- cbind(x1,x2,x3,x4,x5) > cor(cbind(y,x)) y x1 x2

Hi, (R version 2.15.0) I am running a pgm with 1 response (earlier standardized Y) and 44 independent vars (Xi) from the same data =a2: When I run the 'lm' function on single Xi at a time, the beta coefficient for let's say X1 is = -0.08 (se=0.03256) But when I run the same Y with 44 Xi-s with the 'step' function (because I left direction parameter empty, I assume a backward

I have a project due in my Linear Regression class re: regression on a data set & my professor gave us a hint that there were *exactly *2 sig interactions. The data set is attached. We have to find which predictors are significant, & which 2 interactions are sig. Also, I nedd some guidance for this & selecting the best model. I tried the `full' model, that being:

Dear R-experts, I have a question on the formulas used in the gam function of the mgcv package. I am trying to understand the relationships between: y~s(x1)+s(x2)+s(x3)+s(x4) and y~s(x1,x2,x3,x4) Does the latter contain the former? what about the smoothers of all interaction terms? I have (tried to) read the manual pages of gam, formula.gam, smooth.terms, linear.functional.terms but

Dear R-experts, I have a question on the formulas used in the gam function of the mgcv package. I am trying to understand the relationships between: y~s(x1)+s(x2)+s(x3)+s(x4) and y~s(x1,x2,x3,x4) Does the latter contain the former? what about the smoothers of all interaction terms? I have (tried to) read the manual pages of gam, formula.gam, smooth.terms, linear.functional.terms but