similar to: max.col: bug or just oddity?

I've noticed that the max.col function with the default "random" option often gives unexpected results. For instance, in this test, it seems clear what the answer should be: > # second col should always be max > x1 = cbind(1:10, 2:11, -Inf) > > # this works fine > max.col(x1, "first") [1] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 > > # this gives random answers >

Dear R-Developers, I think I found two bugs in max.col(). Ties between zeros are not broken, which might affect simulations. -Inf and Zero can be treated the same, which can give completely wrong results, e.g. when the second max is sought by replacing all maxs by -Inf. To fix max.col I do offer the C-code behind my function rowMax(), which also handles NAs and seems to be faster. However,

There is no function called 'maxCol' in 2.7.0, so should 'maxCol' be purged from maxCol.Rd and 'max.col' be promoted from an alias (and the file renamed)? from today's R-devel: /usr/local/src/R-devel> head ./src/library/base/man/maxCol.Rd % File src/library/base/man/maxCol.Rd % Part of the R package, http://www.R-project.org % Copyright 1995-2007 R Core

Dear Sir, In the functions orderVector1, orderVector1l (R-3.5.2/src/main/sort.c) there are two loops concerning nalast (lines 1096, 1105). I am not sure about the possibility of redefining them, so this function should be a little faster. The first one (line 1096) can be included in the previous 'switch' block (line 1079) (see below). And if you rewrite/duplicate this 'switch'

Hi all, Sorry to bother you with the potentially not too bright question, but since I cannot get it to work, I'll have to ask someone.. I've got this vector: > token [1] sal skal skal bak b_r d_ gal kal l_r n_r pak p_r [13] sal sl_r sn_r spak sp_r st_r s_ bak d_ gal l_r pak [25] p_r sak sl_r sp_r t_ kal n_r s_ st_r sak kal

I've this error How i can find the problem? Apr 23 12:24:43 WARNING[131081]: PRI: received TEI check request for TEI = 89 Apr 23 12:24:47 WARNING[131081]: PRI: received TEI check request for TEI = 89 Apr 23 12:24:48 WARNING[131081]: PRI: !! Got a UA, but i'm in state 1 Apr 23 12:24:53 WARNING[131081]: PRI: received TEI check request for TEI = 89 Apr 23 12:25:02 WARNING[131081]: PRI:

I have included the full configure/make output: (the particular error regarding bessel_i.c is at the END of the report). -walter tautz cd build/R-1.4.0 \ && unset noclobber \ && CPPFLAGS=" " \ LDFLAGS="" \ ./configure --prefix=/software/r-1 \ --datadir=/software/r-1/data \ --libdir=/software/r-1/lib \

R-2.9.0/include/R_ext/Arith.h has: int R_IsNA(double); /* True for R's NA only */ int R_IsNaN(double); /* True for special NaN, *not* for NA */ int R_finite(double); /* True if none of NA, NaN, +/-Inf */ #define ISNA(x) R_IsNA(x) /* True for *both* NA and NaN. The first and last lines are contradictory - if R_IsNA is true only for NA, not NaN, then ISNA should be the same.

Hi, I have a data frame containing a column of human judgments, some of which are missing: > pr[3] label 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 NA 6 3 7 3 8 3 9 3 10 NA 11 NA 12 NA 13 2 14 2 15 2 16 NA 17 1 18 -1 19 -1 20 -1 Accompanying this is a matrix containing multinomial probabilities for the missing values, note that they

Anyone know what would cause this error? !! Got reject for frame 39, retransmitting frame 39 now, updating n_r! !! Got reject for frame 39, retransmitting frame 40 now, updating n_r! I assume this would cause audio issues as well. Thanks, Steve > Message type: CALL PROCEEDING (2) > [18 03 a9 83 89] > Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Exclusive Dchan: 0

Hi- I've posted this on the bugs list, but I'd also like to see if others have had similar problems when connecting via E1 trunks (E400P). I'm getting numerous errors like the following during inbound calls to my E1 channels. These occur when the system is under medium load: WARNING[196621]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5404 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 78, retransmitting

I'm having trouble making todays development snapshot: -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -c stirlerr.c -o stirlerr.o stirlerr.c:34: conflicting types for `Rf_stirlerr' ../../src/include/R_ext/Mathlib.h:557: previous declaration of `Rf_stirlerr' make[3]: *** [stirlerr.o] Error 1 [20] /home/mfa5/gilp/R-versions/R-devel : uname -a SunOS mfa99579 5.6 Generic_105181-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10

We have a memory leak when a function with a closure exits early prior to registering that closure through some path that will guarantee cleanup. The easiest way to fix it is to guarantee that once a closure is passed into a public API, it will be cleaned regardless of whether that API succeeds or fails. But to avoid cleaning the closure more than once, we need to refactor our internal handling,

Hi everyone, I'm experiencing difficulty getting the results I want when I use a nested for loop. I have a data set to which I perform some calculations, and then try to apply a regression over a rolling window. The code runs, but the regression results I am getting (intercept and slope) are simply the same, repeated again and again in the results matrix. The regression does not seem to be

I've got a 4 port T1 card in my Asterisk box with a PRI from Qwest as my PSTN interface. I'm experiencing random dropped calls on the various SIP devices I have tested. Network connectivity to the SIP devices looks ok, and I have tried a variety of the devices including all of the following. Grandstream 286 Grandstresm 486 Sipura SPA 1000 Mediatrix 2102 Some example lines from my logs

Hi all, I apologies in advance if I am missing something very simple here, but since I failed at resolving this myself, I'm sending this question to the list. I would appreciate any help in understanding how the rpart function is (exactly) computing the "improve" (which is given in fit$split), and how it differs when using the split='information' vs split='gini'

Hi! I have the chance to play with a couple of E400P cards, each installed in a IBM e330 XSeries servers (2 x 1GHz P-III CPU 2 Gb RAM, 36Gb SCSI HDD with RH8.0 2.4.18-smp kernel), and I'm trying to test/benchmark this e330/E400P combo generating calls thru /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing One e400P if doing the carrier work making calls and the other just receives the calls: Server#1

Hi, Urgently response would be wonderful, system is a Fedora Core 2. I have a Ericsson BP250 connected to 1 port on the TE405P and another connected to a local telco ISDN30. I have been running CVS-HEAD from about a 2 months ago and upgraded it again just in cause it was a version issue (didn't fix it) but this is what I am getting. When a person calls out from an extension on the BP250 to

I am trying to add the bigmemory packages but I get the following error message: In file included from bigmemory.cpp:14:0: ../inst/include/bigmemory/isna.hpp: In function 'bool neginf(double)': ../inst/include/bigmemory/isna.hpp:22:57: error: 'isinf' was not declared in this scope make: *** [bigmemory.o] Error 1 ERROR: compilation failed for package 'bigmemory' * removing

Dear List i have upgrade my * box with the latest CVS version of Asterisk Stable 1.0 and zaptel/libpri my system is MDK9.2 with 1 TE410P and seems work well for now but i have a little amount of traffic (25 IN/OUT calls) i only notice this Warning.. What kind of error is? ------------------------------- Apr 20 21:28:49 WARNING[147466]: chan_zap.c:5979 zt_pri_error: PRI: !! Got reject for