similar to: problem with the plm package (2)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "problem with the plm package (2)"

2006 Nov 22
1
problem with the plm package
Hi all, I have a problem in installing and using the plm package using R 2.2.0 on windows xp. I installed it from a .zip file downloaded from the CRAN. Apparently everything is ok: > utils:::menuInstallLocal() package 'plm' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked updating HTML package descriptions However, when I try to load it: > library(plm) Errore in lazyLoadDBfetch(key,
2009 May 08
1
plm: plm.data vs pdata.frame
Hello, I am trying to use the plm package for panel econometrics. I am just trying to get started and load my data. It seems from most of the sample documentation that I need to use the pdata.frame function to get my data loaded. However, even after installing the "plm" package, my R installation cannot find the function. I am trying to follow the example in plmEN.pdf (
2009 Aug 03
1
plm summary error
Dear "plm"-Package insiders, [I posted the following observation is April already but unfortunately I am not aware of any answers. With the hope that someone found an answer in the mean time, I ask again:] I realized the following difficulty with the summary.plm function (demonstrated with the example from the ?plm documentation). library(plm) data("Produc",
2009 Apr 25
2
plm Hausman-Taylor model
Dear all- I am have trouble in using the model="ht" option in function plm from the plm library. I am using Package: plm Version: 1.1-1; R version 2.8.1 (2008-12-22) running on a FC-8 linux machine. Here is what I am trying to do: ##---------------------------------------------------------------------------- R> ###Prob 6 Chapter 3 Use R! Applied Econometrics with R (Kleiber
2009 Jul 09
2
plm Issues
Hi List I'm having difficulty understanding how plm should work with dynamic formulas. See the commands and output below on a standard data set. Notice that the first summary(plm(...)) call returns the same result as the second (it shouldn't if it actually uses the lagged variable requested). The third call results in error (trying to use diff'ed variable in regression) Other info:
2012 Mar 08
1
Panel models: Fixed effects & random coefficients in plm
Hello, I am using {plm} to estimate panel models. I want to estimate a model that includes fixed effects for time and individual, but has a random individual effect for the coefficient on the independent variable. That is, I would like to estimate the model: Y_it = a_i + a_t + B_i * X_it + e_it Where i denotes individuals, t denotes time, X is my independent variable, and B (beta) is the
2012 Dec 29
2
I need intercept in plm model
Hi,R 2.15.2 plm() function on Windows 7 when i perform a plm regression, i can't manage to obtain the intercept, but I need it.it gives me just the beta coefficient. my formula: fixed <- plm(deltaS ~ L1.deltaS + L2.deltaS, data=Mody_R, index=c("country_id", "date"), model="within") my output: Coefficients : Estimate Std. Error t-value Pr(>|t|)
2011 Feb 10
1
Longitudinal Weights in PLM package
Hi all, I a semi-beginner with R and I am working with the plm package to examine a longitudinal dataset. Each individual in this dataset has a longitudinal weight for the probability that he or she remains in the sample. Unfortunately, I have not found an argument to use weights in the plm function? I tried ?weights=? like in standard lm or in nlme or lm4 but it does not work. I asked the
2012 Jul 24
3
Plm on splitted data
Hi all I want to use plm function on splitted dataset but facing problems while doing it. I did the same for lm function it worked fine but now my problem forces me to use lags into it while in a single set I have multiple type of data, which I believe can only be done with panel data. The code I am using is A = split(mydata, mydata$Unique.ID.Number) Z = lapply(A, function(df){plm(Total.Sales
2012 Apr 26
1
PLM package PGGLS strange behavior
When using the PLM package (version 1.2-8), I encounter the probem that calling the FGLS estimator evokes strange behavior, when choosing the "random" effects model. After calling the PGGLS function to estimate FGLS, PLM gives me a warning, stating that the "random" model has been replaced with the "pooling" model. I would, however, really like to estimate the random
2013 Sep 04
2
Attribute Length Error when Trying plm Regression
Hello, I am trying to run a fixed effects panel regression on data containing 5 columns and 1,494 rows. I read the data in as follows: >drugsXX<-read.csv(file="C:\\Folder\\vX.X\\Drugs\\drugsXX_panel.csv", head=TRUE, sep=",") Verified it read in correctly and had a good data.frame: >dim(drugsXX) [1] 1494 5 >drugs XX produce expected data with correct column
2009 Jun 12
1
xtable for plm objects
Hello, I am trying to use Sweave to write up a report, and I have used the plm package to do some panel models. I am trying to use xtable to make a nice table for my regression objects (returned by the plm command), but I am getting the error: Error in UseMethod("xtable") : no applicable method for "xtable" It seems like I would want to have xtable treat plm objects exactly
2010 Mar 29
1
plm package duplication problem
hi, i am writing my master thesis and i am dealing with 146474 observations (panel data), i have just learned the R so i am a beginner!! i am trying to use the "plm" package and i have a duplication problem; i have written the following commands to read my data and create my model >dsn<-plm.data(ds, c("stno", "year")) ds=name of my data, stno=individual
2010 Mar 10
1
Trouble with plm in Ubuntu 9
Hello, Apologies in advance if this is a stupid question. I am running R on Ubuntu 9. R version 2.9.2 (2009-08-24) I am trying to work with plm. I think the library is installed, as I can do > library(plm) Loading required package: kinship Loading required package: survival Loading required package: splines Loading required package: nlme Loading required package: lattice [1] "kinship
2012 Mar 14
1
plm function
Dear Sir/ Madam, I am writing about the panel data for my bachelor degree. I would really appreciate if You could help dealing with R functions. I am trying to estimate the panel data lm model with plm function. When i include 3dummy variables into the regression it dont appear in the sumarry of the model, but when i estimate a simple lm model it appears. Why is it so? What should i do to
2010 Apr 08
1
Accessing elements of plm outputs
Dear all, I've just migrated from STATA to R for runing panel regressions and I was very happy to discover the plm package. However, I have a problem when trying to access the "Total Sum of Squares" and "Residual Sum of Squares" on this output: > summary(output) Oneway (individual) effect Within Model Call: plm(formula = Y ~ X1 + X2, data = db, model =
2009 Nov 27
3
problem with "dynformula" from "plm" package
Hello list, I'm following the paper (http://www.jstatsoft.org/v27/i02/paper) on how to use "plm" to run panel regressions, and am having trouble with what I believe should be something very basic. When I run the command (p.9 in the paper): R> dynformula(emp~wage+capital,log=list(capital=FALSE,TRUE),lag=list(emp=2,c(2,3)),diff=list(FALSE,capital=TRUE)) I see: emp ~ wage +
2009 May 29
1
save plm coefficients
Hi R-helpers, I want to determine the coefficients of the following regression for several subsets, and I want to save it in a dataframe: The data is in ?regaccdis?, ?regaccdis$caedois? is the column that defines the subsets and the function I have runned is coef(plm(ff,data=regaccdis,na.action=na.omit,model="pooling",subset=(regaccdis$caedois==i))) I?ve created a dataframe named
2011 Nov 21
1
Problems using log() in a plm() regression.
hey guys I have a panel data set that i want to perform some regressions on. I am using the /plm/ package. I defined a model in the following way: PWBw.pool <- plm(*PWB* ~ log(*I_EQON*) + log(*RD*) + ... + *PAGRI*, data = pfem, na.action=na.exclude, model="pooling") When i run this it gives the following error (the error remains when i use other model = "" specifications
2009 Nov 09
3
Bug in all.equal() or in the plm package
Hi! I noticed that there is a (minor) bug either the command all.equal() or in the "plm" package. I demonstrate this using an example taken from the documentation of plm(): ====================================== R> data("Produc", package="plm") R> zz <- plm(log(gsp)~log(pcap)+log(pc)+log(emp)+unemp, + data=Produc,