similar to: lme - plot - labels

Hello I am trying to fit a REML to some soil mineral data which has been collected over the time period 1999 - 2004. I want to know if the 19 different treatments imposed, differ in terms of their soil mineral content. A tree model of the data has shown differences between the treatments can be attributed to the Magnesium, Potassium and organic matter content of the soil, with Magnesium being the

Windows Vista R 2.10.1 Does the following use of groupedData and lme produce an analysis with both random intercept and slope, or only random slope? zz<-groupedData(y~time | Subject,data=data.frame(data), labels = list( x = "Time", y = "y" ), units = list( x = "(yr)", y = "(mm)") ) plot(zz)

Dear lmer-ers, My thanks for all of you who are sharing your trials and tribulations publicly. I was hoping to elicit some feedback on my thoughts on denominator degrees of freedom for F ratios in mixed models. These thoughts and practices result from my reading of previous postings by Doug Bates and others. - I start by assuming that the appropriate denominator degrees lies between n

Dear R-users, I'm currently having trouble with the implementation of a groupedData object in the lme() function. Executing the following function > applyScalingSimp <- function(input.population) > { > ## GA is a time value > varInOrder <- c("GA","weight","grouping","sex") > modelVar <-

Dear R-users: I have some problems working with lme function, and i would be glad if anyone could help me. this kind of analysis i was used to do with PROC MIXED from SAS, but i would like to move to R, for many reasons... So, the problem is: Imagine the I have 3 factors: fact_A, fact_B and fact_C: The latter I would assume that is random, and the rest of them are fixed. Analysing the

Hi, this is my first time using the nlme package, and I ran into the following puzzling problem. I estimated a mixed effects model using lme, once using groupedData, once explicitly stating the equations. I had the following outputs. All the coefficients were similar, but they're always slightly different, making me think that it's not due to numerical error. Also, what is the

I am trying to do a repeated measurement anova using an lme. I have the following variables: -ID, the identification of the individual -trail, with 2 levels -treatment, with 3 -time, measure 5 times the same individual -VCL, the response variable I tried the following in R, within.gr<-groupedData(VCL~time|ID/treatment/time,data=within)

Hello everyone, I am ploting a groupeddata object with formula: formula(mydatausegroup) BF ~ HO | ID/Infar/Day Using this command: plot(na.omit(mydatausegroup), displayLevel=2,layout=c(10,2),aspect=2) This trellis plot does almost what I want and produces a 10x2 trellis plot, each panel is labeled as ID/Infar where infarct is either 1 or 0. And in each panel, it plots BF vs HO for each Day.

Hello, I have a dataset concerning slugs. For each slug, the number of pumps per one time slot was counted. The number of pumps follows Bi(30, p) where p is very small, thus could be approximated by Poisson dist. (# of pumps is very often = 0) The slugs were observed during 12 time slots which are correlated in time as AR(1). The time slots are divided into two categories: Resting time

I'm trying to understand better the differences between fixed and random effects by running very simple examples in the nlme package. My first attempt was to try doing a t-test in lme. This is very similar to the Rail example that comes with nlme, but it has two groups instead of five. So I try a1 <- 1:10 a2 <- 7:16 t.test(a2,a1) getting t(18)=4.43, p=.0003224. Then I try to do it

Dear R-Community! For example I have a study with 4 treatment groups (10 subjects per group) and 4 visits. Additionally, the gender is taken into account. I think - and hope this is a goog idea (!) - this data can be analysed using lme as below. In a balanced design everything is fine, but in an unbalanced design there are differences depending on fitting y~visit*treat*gender or

Dear all, I am trying (!!!) to generate pdfs that have 8 plots on one page: df = data.frame( day = c(1,2,3,4), var1 = c(1,2,3,4), var2 = c(100,200,300,4000), var3 = c(10,20,300,40000), var4 = c(100000,20000,30000,4000), var5 = c(10,20,30,40), var6 = c(0.001,0.002,0.003,0.004), var7 = c(123,223,123,412), var8 = c(213,123,234,435), all = as.factor(c(1,1,1,1)))

I'm trying to set up a mixed model to solve using lme. It will have 3 fixed effects, two random effects and two interaction terms. I've been reading Pinheiro's and Bates's book on the nmle library, but find the part about display functions to be unclear. When creating a groupedData object from a data.frame, you need to enter a function of the form: response ~primary|grouping

Dear R-help, I am trying to create groupedData objects using the nlme library. I'm missing something basic, I know: Here is the first example in ch.1 of Pinheiro & Bates (2000): library(nlme) x2=Rail$travel;x1=Rail$Rail;eg1=data.frame(x1,x2);eg1gd=Rail print(eg1gd) x11();print(plot(eg1gd)) femodel=lm(x2~x1-1,data=eg1gd) print(femodel$coefficients) Result: x12 x15 x11

Windows 10 64-bit, R-Studio, R version 3.4.3 Several questions relating to groupedData: (1) I am trying to create a groupedData object that can be used to run an analysis that I have been able to urn using lmer. When I include the interaction terms in the groupedData opbject I get an error message stating that + is not meaningful for factors. How do I include factors in my model? See code and

Dear John You are only allowed to have the primary covariate on the left hand side of the vertical bar. Other covariates go in inner or outer. Michael On 22/03/2018 12:59, Sorkin, John wrote: > Windows 10 64-bit, R-Studio, R version 3.4.3 > > > Several questions relating to groupedData: > > (1) I am trying to create a groupedData object that can be used to run an analysis

help.search("groupedData") says that it's part of the lme4 package, but it appears not to be there (details below). Is this because lme4 is new and (perhaps) still under development? > update.packages() trying URL `http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/1.9/PACKAGES' Content type `text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1' length 19113 bytes opened URL downloaded 18Kb >

Sorry - I suspect this is a very basic query. I have a data frame structured "flat" (i.e. separate observations for a given subject ID on separate lines). Using the nlme library I create a groupedData object suitable for further analysis thus: dataset <- groupedData(VARIABLE ~ TIME|ID, data=sfa) The dataset has a large number of VARIABLES of interest so I want to make use of loops

Dear all,   I have data from the following experimental design and trying to fit a mixed model with lme function according to following steps but struggling. Any help is deeply appreciated.   1) Experimental design: I have 40 plants each of which has 4 clones. Each clone planted to one of 4 blocks. Phenotypes were collected from each clone for 3 consecutive years. I have genotypes of plants. I

I created the following groupedData object (nlme library): gd <- groupedData(Conc ~ Time | Subj, order.groups=T, FUN = myf, data=mydata) The idea of the myf function is to reverse the order of the grouping factor Subj (or better, reorder from largest to smallest). In the mydata data set, Subj is an integer that gets converted into a factor in the groupedData object. Does anyone