similar to: Competing risk nomogram

Hi R users, I'd like to draw a nomogram using a competing-risks regression (crr function in R), rather than a cox regression. However, the nomogram function provided in the Design package is not good for this purpose. Do you have any suggestion. I really appreciate your help Many thanks F.Abdollah, MD San-Raffele hospital Milan, Italy -- View this message in context:

Dear all, I found something strange when calculating sin of pi value sin(pi) [1] 1.224606e-16 pi [1] 3.141593 sin(3.141593) [1] -3.464102e-07 Any help and comment should be appreciated. Regards Nguyen ____________________________ Nguyen Dinh Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia

Dear all, I have a stat question that may not be related to R, but I would like to have your advice. I have just read a medical paper in which the authors report the 1-p (where p is the cumulative survival probability from the Kaplan Meier curve) as incidence of disease. Specifically, the study followed ~12000 women on drug A and ~20000 women on drug B for 12 months. During that period

Dear Geskus, I want to develop a prediction model. I followed your paper and analysed thro' weighted coxph approach. I can develop nomogram based on the final model also. But I do not know how to do internal validation of the model and subsequently obtain calibration plot. Is it possible to use Wolbers et al Epid 2009 approach 9 (R code for internal validation and calibration) . It is

Dear R helpers, I would like to have abline, for a lm model for example, lying within data range. Do you know how to get it? Thank in advance Nguyen D Nguyen #CODE x<- rnorm(200, 35,5) y<- rnorm(200, 0.87,0.12) plot(y~x, xlim=c(0,50), pch=17, bty="l") abline(lm(y~x)) # I would like abline is between min(x) and max(x) [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, A friend of mine, who just installed Rcmdr package. When calling the package, the error as following comes up. And actually, I've checked in CRAN packages, the tcltk package doesn't exist anymore, but tcltk2. Any help is appreciated Regards Nguyen D Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia library(Rcmdr) Loading required package: tcltk Loading Tcl/Tk

Dear Prof Gray and everyone, As our package developers discussed about incompatibility between Design and survival packages, I faced another problem with cmprsk- a survival dependent packacge. The problem is exactly similar to what happened to the Design package that when I just started running cuminc function, R was suddenly closed. These incidents suggest that maybe many other survival

Dear Christian, Every single time check update package, ?cwhmisc? always requests updating. I?m aware that the package was latest updated in CRAN on 20Nov2008. Is there anything wrong with my R library or somethingelse? I use R 2.8.1 on Window XP service pack 2 Regards Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia

Dear R helpers I have a data set sth like this: set.seed(123);dat <- data.frame(ID= c(rep(1,2),rep(2,3), rep(3,3), rep(4,4), rep(5,5)), var1 =rnorm(17, 35,2), var2=runif(17,0,1)) dat ID var1 var2 1 1 33.87905 0.02461368 2 1 34.53965 0.47779597 3 2 38.11742 0.75845954 4 2 35.14102 0.21640794 5 2 35.25858 0.31818101 6 3 38.43013

Hi, Sorry not to provide R-code in my previous mail. R code is below #install.packages("rms") require(rms) #install.packages("mstate") library(mstate) require(splines) library(ggplot2) library(survival) library(splines) #install.packages("survsim") require(survsim) set.seed(10) df<-crisk.sim(n=500, foltime=10, dist.ev=rep("lnorm",2),

Dear Prof Harrell and everyone, My PC: Window XP service pack 3 and service pack 2 R version 2.8.1 and 2.9 alpha For the last 3 days, after updating R, my two computers have been facing problems when running existing and runable R commands that involves with Design package I attempt to use 'survest', but I failed all the times with R (both 2.8.1 and 2.9 alpha) being shut down

Hi Rs, I am analyzing a time to event dataset with several competing risks. 0 = Active by end of study 1 = Stopped treatment to start another treatment 2 = Lost 3 = Dead My event of interest in Lost to Followup but starting a different treatment and dying are competing risks. All 1,2,3 events are events of exiting the study, but it's only 2-LTFU that we are concerned with (I know I am

Dear list, I'm facing the following problem : A cox model with my sex variable interacting with several continuous variables : cph(S~sex*(x1+x2+x3)) And I'd like to make a nomogram. I know it's a bit tricky and one mights argue that nomogram is not a good a choice... I could use the parameter interact=list(sex=("male","female"),x1=c(a,b,c))... but with rcs or pol

Hello, I am constructing a nomogram using cph and nomogram commands in Dr. Harrell's Design/RMS package. The HR that I obtain for dichotomous and categorical variables are identical to those that I obtain using STATA stcox. However, the inter-quartile HR I obtain for continuous variables is obviously different, since STATA gives me HR for each unit (year, centimeter, etc) like coxph would

Dear R users, I am new to R and wanted to apply competing risk methods in my research work. I used the R code given by Zhang et al in his paper 'Nomogram for survival analysis in the presence of competing risks published in Ann Trans Med 2017:5(20):403. I am struggling with getting calibration curve thro' internal validation. I am happy to receive suggestion in the coding as well

Hi, I would like to emphasize ("zoom") the zone of a nomogram where the probability are > 0.01 (nomogram built with nomogram, Design). As a consequence, I don't need to draw the part of the "Total points" axis with score < 60 equivalent in my case to a linear predictor < 4.5 - As far as I know, this is not possible with the arguments of the function. - Changing

Dear R-users, I am a novice R-user with some experience in using the RMS package for taking nomograms after various survival models. This time, I am trying to plot a nomogram after a Random Effects Cox, implemented by the "coxme" package. My questions are: 1. Is it possible to take a nomogram directly after the coxme survival function? 2. If not is there a way to take the linear

Dear R-users, I have used the nomogram function from the rms package for a logistic regresison model made with lrm(). Everything works perfectly (r version 2.15.1 on a mac). My question is this: if my final model is not the one created by lrm, but I internally validated the model and 'shrunk' the regression coefficients and computed a new intercept, how can I build a nomogram using that

Hello, I am using Dr. Harrell's design package to make a nomogram. I was able to make a beautiful one. However, I want to change 5-year survival probability to 5-year failure probability. I couldn?t get hazard rate from Hazard(f1) because I used cph for the model. Here is my code: f1 <- cph(Surv(retime,dfs) ~ age+her2+t_stage+n_stage+er+grade+cytcyt+Cyt_PCDK2 , data=data11, surv=T,

Hello, I am using Dr. Harrell's rms package to make a nomogram. I was able to make a beautiful one. However, I want to change 5-year survival probability to 5-year failure probability. I couldn?t get hazard rate from Hazard(f1) because I used cph for the model. Here is my code: library(rms) f1 <- cph(Surv(retime,dfs) ~ age+her2+t_stage+n_stage+er+grade+cytcyt+Cyt_PCDK2 , data=data11,