similar to: Help understanding how nls parses the formula argument to estimate the model

I could use some help understanding how nls parses the formula argument to a model.frame and estimates the model. I am trying to utilize the functionality of the nls formula argument to modify garchFit() to handle other variables in the mean equation besides just an arma(u,v) specification. My nonlinear model is y<-nls(t~a*sin(w*2*pi/365*id+p)+b*id+int,data=t1,

I could use some help understanding how nls parses the formula argument to a model.frame and estimates the model. I am trying to utilize the functionality of the nls formula argument to modify garchFit() to handle other variables in the mean equation besides just an arma(u,v) specification. My nonlinear model is y<-nls(t~a*sin(w*2*pi/365*id+p)+b*id+int,data=t1,

hi list, used versions: 2.12.1 and 2.14.0 under ubuntu and macosx. I recently stumbled over a problem with `nls', which occurs if the model is not specified explicitly but via an evaluation of a 'call' object. simple example: 8<-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- nlsProblem <- function (len = 5) {

Hi All, I've hit a problem using nls. I think it may be a restriction in the applicability of nls and I may have found a fix, but I've been wrong before. This example is simplified to the essentials. My real application is much more complicated. Take a function of matrix 'x' with additional arguments: matrix 'aMat' whose values are _not_ to be determined by nls vector

Dear all Nobody responded to my previous post so far so I try with more offending subject. I just encountered a strange problem with nls formula. I tried to use nls in cycle but I was not successful. I traced the problem to some parse command. Here is an example DF<-data.frame(x=1:10, y=3*(1:10)^.5+rnorm(10)) coef(lm(log(DF[,2])~log(DF[,1]))) (Intercept) log(DF[, 1]) 0.7437320

Hello I was trying to estimate the weibull model using nls after putting OLS values as the initial inputs to NLS. I tried multiple times but still i m getting the same error of Error in nlsModel(formula, mf, start, wts) : singular gradient matrix at initial parameter estimates. The Program is as below > vel <- c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) > df <- data.frame(conc, vel) >

Dear sirs It seems like there is a bug in `profile.nls` with `algorithm = "plinear"` when a matrix is supplied on the right hand side. Here is the bug and a potential fix ##### # example where profile.nls does not work with `plinear` but does with # `default` require(graphics) set.seed(1) DNase1 <- subset(DNase, Run == 1) x <- rnorm(nrow(DNase1)) f1 <- nls(density ~ b1/(1 +

Greetings, I am struggling a bit with a non-linear regression. The problem is described below with the known values r and D inidcated. I tried to alter the start values but get always following error message: Error in nlsModel(formula, mf, start, wts): singular gradient matrix at initial parameter estimates Calls: nls -> switch -> nlsModel I might be missing something with regard to the

Hello there, I am trying to fit an exponential model using nls to some data. #data t <- c(0,15,30,60,90,120,240,360,480) var <- c(0.36,9.72,15.50,23.50,31.44,40.66,59.81,73.11,81.65) df <- data.frame(t, var) # model # var ~ a+b*(1-exp(-k*t)) # I'm looking for values of a,b and k # formula # mod <- nls(formula = var ~ a+b *(1-exp((-k)*t)), start=list(a=0, b=10,

Hey all, I'm trying to fit a non-linear model y ~ a * constant ^ b * x ^ c and estimates the paramaters a, b and c. Using the nls function, I'm getting following error message: Error in nlsModel(formula, mf, start, wts) : singular gradient matrix at initial parameter estimates If I logarithmize the whole equation log(y) ~ log (a) + b * log(constant) + c * log(x) and fit the

Hello, I have data like the following: datum <- structure(list(Y = c(415.5, 3847.83333325, 1942.833333325, 1215.22222233333, 950.142857325, 2399.5833335, 804.75, 579.5, 841.708333325, 494.053571425 ), X = c(1.081818182, 0.492727273, 0.756363636, 0.896363636, 1.518181818, 0.499166667, 1.354545455, 1.61, 1.706363636, 1.063636364 )), .Names = c("Y", "X"), row.names = c(NA,

Hello, I am trying to model a type II functional response of number of prey eaten (Ne) against number supplied (No) with a non-linear least squares regression (nls). I am using a modification of Holling's (1959) disc equation to account for non-replacement of prey; Ne=No{1-exp[a(bNe-T)]} where a is the attack rate, b is the handling time, and T is the experimental period. My script is as

Hi, I am a non-expert user of R. I am essaying the fit of two different functions to my data, but I receive two different error messages. I suppose I have two different problems here... But, of which nature? In the first instance I did try with some different starting values for the parameters, but without success. If anyone could suggest a sensible way to proceed to solve these I would be

I have data vectors x and y both with 179 observations. I'm trying to fit a nonlinear model with five parameters using nls. The formula is only defined within a range of x-values, it should be zero otherwise, thus my attempted use of ifelse: > df<-data.frame(x,y) >

I need help on calling the svydesign function in the survey package (although this error appears not to be specific to svydesign). I am passing parameters incorrectly but am not sure how to correct the problem. ## Call the main function PS.sim (one of mine). The dots are parameters I omitted to simplify the question. ## y.col, str.col, clus.id, and PS.col are names of columns in the object pop.

Hello, nls library provides 6 self-starting models, among them: SSfp, a four parameters logistic function. Its self-starting procedure involves several steps. One of these steps is: pars <- as.vector(coef(nls(y ~ cbind(1, 1/(1 + exp((xmid - x)/exp(lscal)))), data = xydata, start = list(lscal = 0), algorithm = "plinear"))) which assumes an initial value of lscal equal to 0. If lscal

Hi,all: I met a problem of nls. My data: x y 60 0.8 80 6.5 100 20.5 120 45.9 I want to fit exp curve of data. My code: > nls(y ~ exp(a + b*x)+d,start=list(a=0,b=0,d=1)) Error in nlsModel(formula, mf, start, wts) : singular gradient matrix at initial parameter estimates I can't find out the reason for the error. Any suggesions are welcome. Many thanks. [[alternative HTML

I'm trying the different parameters, but don't know what the error is: Error in nlsModel(formula, mf, start, wts) : singular gradient matrix at initial parameter estimates Thanks for any suggestions. On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Don Cohen <don-r-help at isis.cs3-inc.com> wrote: > > If you know the period and want to fit phase and amplitude, this is > equivalent to

Dear R-users, I am trying to create a model using the NLS function, such that: Y = f(X) + q + e Where f is a nonlinear (Weibull: a*(1-exp(-b*X^c)) function of X and q is a covariate (continous variable) and e is an error term. I know that you can create multiple nonlinear regressions where x is polynomial for example, but is it possible to do this kind of thing when x is a function with unknown

Hi, I'm trying to make a regression of the form : formula <- y ~ Asym_inf + Asym_sup * ( (1 / (1 + (n1 * (exp( (tmid1-x) / scal1) )^(1/n1) ) ) ) - (1 / (1 + (n2 * (exp( (tmid2-x) / scal2) )^(1/n2) ) ) ) ) which is a sum of the generalized logistic model proposed by richards. with data such as these: x <- c(88,113,128,143,157,172,184,198,210,226,240,249,263,284,302,340) y <-