similar to: augPred plot in nlme library

Hi all I tried to reproduce an example with lme and used the Orthodont dataset. library(nlme) fm2a.1 <- lme(distance ~ age + Sex, data = Orthodont, random = ~ 1 | Subject) anova(fm2a.1) > numDF denDF F-value p-value > (Intercept) 1 80 4123.156 <.0001 > age 1 80 114.838 <.0001 > Sex 1 25 9.292 0.0054 or alternatively

sent this to the list yesterday but didn't see it listed in the daily summary ... apologies if you receive it twice ... ________________________________ From: Afshartous, David Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 10:02 AM To: 'r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch' Subject: sapply question All: I'm trying to use sapply to break up data within another function. (tapply doens't seem to work

All, In the function below I have 24 individuals and 6 calculations per individual. The 6 calculations are collected each time in a 1:24 loop when calculating "delta". I'd like to collect all 144 = 24*6 calculations in one vector ("delta.patient.comb"). The function works as is via indexing, but is there an easier way to collect the measurements via appendinng the 6

All, I have a question RE plotting the prediction lines of a random effects model via augPred. I'll illustrate via the Pixel dataset within the nlme package: library(nlme) attach(Pixel) fm1Pixel = lme(pixel ~ day + I(day^2), data = Pixel, random = list(Dog = ~ 1)) plot(augPred(fm1Pixel)) ### 10 fitted lines since there are 10 dogs fm2Pixel = update(fm1Pixel, . ~ . + Side)

Hi using this code example: library(nlme) fm1 <- lme(Orthodont, random = ~1) plot(augPred(fm1)) is there any way to have the plots in each cell labelled and ordered according to Orthodont$Sex? I.e. in addition to the bar with the label for Orthodont$Subject there is another bar labelling the Sex of the subject? thanks a lot christoph --

Hi, I'm new at this, I'm very confused, and I think I'm missing something important here. In our pet example we have this: > fm <- lme(Orthodont) > plot(Orthodont) > plot(augPred(fm, level = 0:1)) which gives us a trellis plot with the females above the males, starting with "F03", "F04", "F11", "F06", etc. I thought the point of

Dear all I am trying nlme together with Pinheiro/Bates book. I constructed grouped data object with suitable plotting layout (according to some common factor, panels from bottom to top are in increasing order). When I do nlme(... some stuff...) I get fitted object which I can plot with plot(augPred(fit.nlme6, level=0:1)) but it results in completely different ordering. Is there any way

Dear all as I did not get any response on my post about abline and plot(augPred)) I try again. I hope I do not break some posting guide rules. I would try to contact package maintainer directly but there is stated to be R-core people, so I feel R-help list shall be OK. I need to draw straight lines through augPred plotted panels (vertical or horizontal) at specified point. I know I shall

Hello, Is there a way to get augPred to work with lme if a subset statement is used? For example, if I modify the example from ?augPred.lme to include a subset statement, I get the following error: fm1 <- lme(Orthodont, random = ~1, subset=distance>19) augPred(fm1, length.out = 2, level = c(0,1)) Error in tapply(object[[nm]], groups, FUN[["numeric"]], ...) : arguments

Using formulas constructed from strings only partially works for me in lme: library(nlme) data(Orthodont) fm2<-lme(as.formula("distance~age"),data=Orthodont,random=~1|Subject) summary(fm2) # works augPred(fm2) # fails #Error in inherits(object, "formula") : #Argument "object" is missing, with no default I assume that my use of as.formula is wrong, but

Dea-R community. I'd like to draw your attention to an issue I have recently encountered while doing my current data analysis. I've got an unexpected (to me) result from the command: > augPred(lmList(my.object)), 'my.object' being a grouped data frame of class: > class(my.object) [1] "nfnGroupedData" "nfGroupedData" "groupedData"

Hello, I have two very rudimentary questions regarding the random effects terms in the lme and lmer functions. I apologize if this also partly strays into a general statistics question, but I'm a bit new to this all. So hopefully it'll be a quick problem to sort out... Here is my experimental setup: I raised butterflies in 5 different testing chambers all set to different

Hi all, I am building R 2.12.0 patched this morning from source on Snow Leopard (10.6.4). In fact, three times now, with separate clean source and build directories each time, just to be sure that the issue is predictable. I would be happy to have somebody tell me that I am missing something fundamental here also... After running make check-all, I get the following error for 'nlme': *

Dear R-users, I am a newbie to this site and a relative new-comer to S/R, so please tread lightly, for you tread... There have been several posting relating to problems with augPred() from the nlme library. Here is a "fix" for one of these problems which may lie at the root of others. In my case the problem with augPred() lay in gsummary(), which augPred() uses, causing it to fail.

I read the posts about augPred with lme, but does anyone know if there is a correlate for augPred for lmer? Specifically, I want to be able to use it to plot projections for all groups in an lmer class object using plot(augPred(lmer.object)). Thanks, Kyle *************************************** J. Kyle Roberts, Ph.D. Baylor College of Medicine Center for Educational Outreach One Baylor Plaza,

Hello, I want to use lme to fit two (or more) models, and then compare the fits on each individual. I know how to write my own code to do this (for each individual, plot the raw data, followed by lines() to plot each fitted curve) but I would like to use plot(augPred(... as it produces a nice trellis plot. I thought I could do this with par(new=T) but it does not seem to work.

Hi Well, yes I tried it about two weeks ago but my post did not get through as it still awaits moderator approval. I could check which column is offending but actually it is only minor nuisance, I can live with selection of columns before fitting a model. What seems to me strange is that both full dataset and only selected colums gave me identical fit results but only one works within augPred.

Dear R users; Ive got two questions concerning nlme library 3.1-65 (running on R 2.2.0 / Win XP Pro). The first one is related to augPred function. Ive been working with a nonlinear mixed model with no problems so far. However, when the parameters of the model are specified in terms of some other covariates, say treatment (i.e. phi1~trt1+trt2, etc) the augPred function give me the following

> On Aug 23, 2017, at 8:08 AM, PIKAL Petr <petr.pikal at precheza.cz> wrote: > > Hi > > Well, yes I tried it about two weeks ago but my post did not get through as it still awaits moderator approval. It got through just fine. It appeared on Aug 15. It just didn't get any replies. As I read your original question in this thread, it was not clear to me that you had

All, When I take a subset of a factor the reduced factor still maintains all the original levels of the factor when say forming the key in a plot. The data is correct, but the variable still "remembers" the original levels. See below for reproducible code. Does anyone know how to fix this? cheers, dave fact = as.factor(c(rep("A", 3),rep("B", 3), rep("C",