similar to: Sweave and the "[" function

I am introducing the scan() function to my class. Consider the following file (Scanexamp.Rnw ) \documentclass[12pt]{article} \begin{document} <<>>= height = scan() 64 62 66 65 62 69 72 72 70 part = scan(what = character(0)) "Soprano" "Soprano" "Soprano" "Alto" "Alto" "Tenor" "Tenor" "Bass"

Hi In the example .Rnw file below, only the newline between c and d is visible in the resulting .tex file after running R CMD Sweave. What is the reason for this behavior? Newlines are important in LaTeX and should be preserved. In particular, this behavior leads to incorrect LaTeX code generated when using tikz(console=TRUE) inside a Sweave chunk, as shown in the tikzDevice vignette. A

Sweave is very useful, and I'm gradually getting used to it. I've just been battling Sweave over the re-use of code chunks. As I am pretty ignorant in the byways of both Sweave and R, this took a chunk of time to sort out. Here is what I learned: If one re-uses a code chunk, then Sweave (but not Stangle) will insist that <> start in column 1. In particular, white space to its left

Hello, I try to document some R scripts for my collegues and observed the problem, that Sweave strips comment lines away. As a small example I write in an Rtex file: \begin{Scode} ## a small example test() # line comment \end{Scode} ... the .tex file generated by Sweave only contains: \begin{Schunk} \begin{Sinput} test() \end{Sinput} \end{Schunk} ... and all the comments are lost.

Hello, I try to document some R scripts for my collegues and observed the problem, that Sweave strips comment lines away. As a small example I write in an Rtex file: \begin{Scode} ## a small example test() # line comment \end{Scode} ... the .tex file generated by Sweave only contains: \begin{Schunk} \begin{Sinput} test() \end{Sinput} \end{Schunk} ... and all the comments are lost.

Hi list, I need to process a Rnw file and and a csv file (both are encoded in UTF-8) under Windows XP (R Version 2.11.0, i386, mingw32). I can source and run the Rnw file: > Stangle("Bericht.Rnw") Writing to file Bericht.R > source(file("Bericht.R", encoding="UTF-8")) which runs fine, but running Sweave() failed: > Sweave("Bericht.Rnw")

I've noticed a change in behavior in R 2.12.0 from 2.11.1 regarding the treatment of absolute paths in the file argument of Sweave in a Windows environment. Consider the minimal Rnw file, attached and reproduced below my signature in case .Rnw files get stripped. This file is stored on my (Windows) computer in H:/My Documents. Using an absolute path with the standard window's

When I re-use a code chunk in Sweave, together with keep.source=TRUE, I would like to follow usual programming conventions in which the amount of white space on the left indicates logical structure. It seems that one can't do this in Sweave, or am I wrong? for (i in ind) { do such-and-such and then <<code chunk 20>> do something-else } Sweave will say that << is

Dear all, When I use the cacheSweave package together with the Sweave option keep.source = TRUE, all the LaTeX code before the Sweave code chunk is included in the TeX file to be compiled. For example, with the following Sweave file \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage[nogin]{Sweave} % Sweave options \SweaveOpts{keep.source=TRUE, strip.white=TRUE, eps=FALSE, pdf=TRUE} \begin{document}

I have found a quite strange (to me) behaviour in Sweave. It only occurs in the following situation: 1. define a variable in one chunk 2. use it within a subsequent figure-generating chunk 3. delete it at the end of that same chunk Then the Sweave driver chokes, not finding the variable name when generating the figure Example: % document bug2.Rnw \documentclass{article} \usepackage{Sweave}

Dear guRus, I would like to loop over a medium amount of Sweave code, including both R and LaTeX chunks. Is there any way to do so? As an illustration, can I create a .tex file like this using a loop within a .Rnw file, where the "1,2,3" comes from some iteration variable in R? ################################################ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{Sweave} \begin{document}

Hello, I'm using R1.8.1 on windows 2000 and version 1.8.1 of the tools package. I am attempting to have Sweave write files to a different directory via: testfile <- system.file("Sweave", "Sweave-test-1.Rnw", package = "tools") ## create a LaTeX file Sweave( testfile, output = "C:/temp/Sweave-test-1.tex",

Dear All, I have been using Sweave (mainly via the Sweave.sh script) and really like it. I am working a paper (using Sweave, of course) which includes several time-consuming computations, and it gets tedious to re-compile the whoel thing every time I made changes. Then I discover the "cacheSweave" package, which seems the right solution to my problem. I only have on problem. Here is

Dear all, There seems to be a problem with named chunks in Sweave with the version of R under development (downloaded yesterday). When I sweave the file toto.Rnw described at the end of this mail (Ubuntu 10.04 LTS), the function Sweave returns an Internal error: > utils::Sweave("toto.Rnw") Writing to file toto.tex Processing code chunks ... 1 : echo term verbatim (label=a) 2

Hi List, Please see the following simple example which illustrate the problem. I'm using R-2.5.0 in WinXP and R2HTML 1.58. Thanks, ....Tao #============="test.rnw" ================= <html> <body> <div> <h1 align=center>Report</h1> <p> <<echo=FALSE,results=html>>= print(y) print("\n") print(paste("(",

Hi I am thinking about using Sweave more frequently, especially for documenting code. But the syntax is slightly awkward for me (<<name>>= ... @), and I was thinking if there would be a way of importing the type of code extracted from an Rnw file back into an Rnw file? The advantage would be that the code could run in R without tangling. Obviously, sweave options could not be

Hello, Sweave seems to have trouble processing german letters in R. For example, my noweb R-input looks like this. <<>>= Oberfl?chenfehler = c(4, 11, 6, 2, 7, 9) @ If I send it through Sweave, I get the following error message. error: chunk 1 Error in parse(text = chunk) : unexpected input in "Oberfl??" extra: Warning message: In readLines(f[1]) : underfull last line in

Full_Name: Kevin Coombes Version: 2.4.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (143.111.22.24) I'm running R 2.4.0 on a Windows XP machine, with only the default packages loaded. Running Sweave or Stangle on the following Rnw file: -------------- % bug.Rnw \begin{document} Demonstrate an Sweave/Stangle bug. <<info>>= sessionInfo() @ <<getFDR>>= x <- 1 @

Hello R-users! I have tried to use Sweave within LyX* and found two ways to accomplish this. I have attached LyX source file for both ways. *<http://www.lyx.org> Lep pozdrav / With regards, Gregor Gorjanc ---------------------------------------------------------------------- University of Ljubljana Biotechnical Faculty URI: http://www.bfro.uni-lj.si/MR/ggorjan Zootechnical

Hi Everyone: I was having trouble getting the plot size correct when putting a plot in an sweave document. So, I searched on the internet and I found a clever solution where the person uses the cat function to write latex code so he can include the cat code in the chunk and place the plot using width and height. The solution is here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2009-April/195094.html.