similar to: I'm on vacation

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90000 matches similar to: "I'm on vacation"

2003 Nov 04
0
resend: odd system in findsmb output
This is a resend. I'm seeing this odd system with an IP from a different subnet again. Again ideas why this happens? Does anyone know why I might see the following output from 'findsmb'? Notice the unknown system on a completely different subnet. Would this normally be seen if someone brought in a system with a static IP on a different subnet and connected it to the network? IP
2019 Sep 04
2
[Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?
> > It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed > case-sensitive. > > And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address > cleanup/canonicalisation before forwarding mails to dovecot. > > ---------- > RFC 5321: > > "Local-part = Dot-string / Quoted-string ; MAY be case-sensitive > [?] > While the above definition
2019 Sep 09
1
[Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?
> On 9 Sep 2019, at 16.17, Philipp Faeustlin via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > >> It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed >> case-sensitive. >> And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address >> cleanup/canonicalisation before forwarding mails to dovecot. >> ---------- >> RFC
2002 Jul 20
1
*****SPAM***** Special Savings On Inkjet Cartridges
SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. SPAM: SPAM: Content analysis details: (9 hits, 5 required) SPAM: Hit! (0.6 points) From: does not include a real name
2019 Sep 09
0
[Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?
> It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed > case-sensitive. > > And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address > cleanup/canonicalisation before forwarding mails to dovecot. > > ---------- > RFC 5321: > > "Local-part ? ? = Dot-string / Quoted-string ; MAY be case-sensitive > [?] >
2012 Aug 09
1
looking for information on Vacation auto-reply
Hello We are looking for information on how to use Vacation auto-reply . I've read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Usage and a few other pages, but have not found how to set it up. We use sogo and thunderbird . Is there a how to or document for this somewhere? This is our configuration information: dovecot -n # 2.1.7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux
2007 Apr 26
2
SEGV with Dovecot v1.0.0 Deliver and cmusieve v1.0.1 and vacation
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I have a small Sieve script that tries to use vacation that segfaults. The script is the one from http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve. When I change the email address (I changed the local part into "skai"), hence, vacation is skipped, the mail is delivered without any problem. ==== script start require ["fileinto",
2012 Nov 26
3
Vacation messages come from POSTMASTER, not user
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address. Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the vacation. Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for example reply, sieve script and dovecot -n output) Any help appreciated! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sieve script used: if
2008 Jul 18
4
Problems with dovecot/sieve and vacation
Hello, First of all, initial data: # dovecot --version 1.0.rc15 # dovecot -n # /etc/dovecot.conf protocols: imaps pop3s disable_plaintext_auth: yes login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login login_max_processes_count: 256
2008 Aug 12
4
dovecot sieve sends vacation messages with null envelope sender
I am using this simple sieve script to do "vacation": require ["fileinto", "vacation"]; if exists "X-Spam-Flag" { stop; } vacation :days 1 :subject "Out of office reply" :addresses ["<email address hidden>", "<email address hidden>" ] "I am on vacation until 2008-08-07. If you have something urgent,
2007 Jul 25
2
Vacation message functionality
Hi, Since I will soon be attempting to get this working on one of my client's systems, I posed a question on the postfix list - since they mostly dislike vacation messages - but *ardent haters* of badly configured vacation message systems - as to the quality of the dovecot vacation message function. The only response I got did seem to have a few very good suggestions for additional
2019 May 14
1
LDA-based vacation responses bouncing
I've got dovecot vacataion auto-responses working via sieve, but when the responses are sent, they are sent as if they are to be locally delivered, which causes them to bounce for domains that I am not local for. How can I get dovecot's sieve vacation response to check the domain is local or not? Here is an example of what happens: The LDA notices it needs to send a vacation response:
2018 Mar 03
2
sieve vacation alias handling problem
On 2018-03-03 21:28, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 3/2/2018 om 3:35 PM schreef Karol Augustin: >> Hi, >> >> I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable. >> >> The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases sieve >> responds to all of them, not only to :addresses specified. >> >> From testing it seems that
2004 Aug 04
0
Bogus patent applications (was: [RANT] ... Broadvoice)
Jayson Vantuyl wrote: > Mmmmmm. I'm should patent that. > Something like "Patent for Using Spam > Filters to Block Stuff That Isn't Spam" or > something equally obvious. I like it. That won't make it even past the sloppiest examiner. You would have to wrap it up nicely and present it as something novel, like so ... ------------------------- Method and
2009 Aug 13
0
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I > want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are > chained together. The documentation mentions something about calling > certain methods from within gdb, but isn't there some option when > invoking the compiler
2009 Aug 07
2
sieve vacation response
Hello, we're implementing a dovecot 1.2.1 with sieve 0.1.7 and managesieve 0.11.7. We're having problems with creating sieve scripts so that vacation works. Our script looks like this: require ["fileinto", "vacation"]; if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] "*someone at example.com*" { if not header :matches "X-Spam-Status"
2015 Apr 04
3
speaking of sieve scripts... how to selectively not send vacation autoreply
Don't need to block anyone like in the "Re: Dovecot Oy merger with Open-Xchange AG" thread, but when I have my vacation recipie active, I'd like it to NOT reply to certain addresses. I tried the following, you can see the section with if header :contains "addressIdontwant at repliedtoo.tld" is commented out, once I'd added that section, no Vacation messages
2008 Dec 15
2
cmusieve, vacation and error at file_dotlock_create
Hello again, managesieve is working. Now I tried a vacation script with the result that the vacation response is sent but I got he following error: deliver(test1 at xxxxxx.de): 2008-12-15 14:34:28 Error: file_dotlock_create(/home/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir/.dovecot.lda-dupes) failed: No such file or directory /home/vmail/xxxxxx.de/test1/Maildir/ is the correct dir, there are the other files like
2009 Aug 13
2
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
Chris Lattner wrote: On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I > want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are > chained together. The documentation mentions something about calling > certain methods from within gdb, but isn't there some option when >
2004 Jun 21
0
Your message was flagged as possible spam (PR#6996)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1087785732-11892-7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ******************************** IMPORTANT: This informational message was sent from an unattended mailbox. Do not respond directly to this message. Please read it in its entirety for ways you can