Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100000 matches similar to: "I'm on vacation"
2003 Nov 04
0
resend: odd system in findsmb output
This is a resend. I'm seeing this odd system with an IP from a different
subnet again. Again ideas why this happens?
Does anyone know why I might see the following output from 'findsmb'?
Notice the unknown system on a completely different subnet. Would this
normally be seen if someone brought in a system with a static IP on a
different subnet and connected it to the network?
IP
2019 Sep 04
2
[Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?
>
> It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed
> case-sensitive.
>
> And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address
> cleanup/canonicalisation before forwarding mails to dovecot.
>
> ----------
> RFC 5321:
>
> "Local-part = Dot-string / Quoted-string ; MAY be case-sensitive
> [?]
> While the above definition
2019 Sep 09
1
[Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?
> On 9 Sep 2019, at 16.17, Philipp Faeustlin via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
>> It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed
>> case-sensitive.
>> And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address
>> cleanup/canonicalisation before forwarding mails to dovecot.
>> ----------
>> RFC
2002 Jul 20
1
*****SPAM***** Special Savings On Inkjet Cartridges
SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
SPAM:
SPAM: Content analysis details: (9 hits, 5 required)
SPAM: Hit! (0.6 points) From: does not include a real name
2019 Sep 09
0
[Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?
> It is not recommended to rely on local-part case, but it is indeed
> case-sensitive.
>
> And this is to avoid such issues that postfix supports address
> cleanup/canonicalisation before forwarding mails to dovecot.
>
> ----------
> RFC 5321:
>
> "Local-part ? ? = Dot-string / Quoted-string ; MAY be case-sensitive
> [?]
>
2012 Aug 09
1
looking for information on Vacation auto-reply
Hello
We are looking for information on how to use Vacation auto-reply .
I've read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Usage and a few
other pages, but have not found how to set it up.
We use sogo and thunderbird .
Is there a how to or document for this somewhere?
This is our configuration information:
dovecot -n
# 2.1.7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux
2007 Apr 26
2
SEGV with Dovecot v1.0.0 Deliver and cmusieve v1.0.1 and vacation
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have a small Sieve script that tries to use vacation that segfaults.
The script is the one from http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve.
When I change the email address (I changed the local part into "skai"),
hence, vacation is skipped, the mail is delivered without any problem.
==== script start
require ["fileinto",
2012 Nov 26
3
Vacation messages come from POSTMASTER, not user
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for example
reply, sieve script and dovecot -n output)
Any help appreciated!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sieve script used:
if
2008 Jul 18
4
Problems with dovecot/sieve and vacation
Hello,
First of all, initial data:
# dovecot --version
1.0.rc15
# dovecot -n
# /etc/dovecot.conf
protocols: imaps pop3s
disable_plaintext_auth: yes
login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
login_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
login_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login
login_max_processes_count: 256
2008 Aug 12
4
dovecot sieve sends vacation messages with null envelope sender
I am using this simple sieve script to do "vacation":
require ["fileinto", "vacation"];
if exists "X-Spam-Flag" {
stop;
}
vacation
:days 1
:subject "Out of office reply"
:addresses ["<email address hidden>", "<email address hidden>" ]
"I am on vacation until 2008-08-07.
If you have something urgent,
2007 Jul 25
2
Vacation message functionality
Hi,
Since I will soon be attempting to get this working on one of my
client's systems, I posed a question on the postfix list - since they
mostly dislike vacation messages - but *ardent haters* of badly
configured vacation message systems - as to the quality of the dovecot
vacation message function. The only response I got did seem to have a
few very good suggestions for additional
2019 May 14
1
LDA-based vacation responses bouncing
I've got dovecot vacataion auto-responses working via sieve, but when
the responses are sent, they are sent as if they are to be locally
delivered, which causes them to bounce for domains that I am not local
for. How can I get dovecot's sieve vacation response to check the domain
is local or not?
Here is an example of what happens:
The LDA notices it needs to send a vacation response:
2018 Mar 03
2
sieve vacation alias handling problem
On 2018-03-03 21:28, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Op 3/2/2018 om 3:35 PM schreef Karol Augustin:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable.
>>
>> The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases sieve
>> responds to all of them, not only to :addresses specified.
>>
>> From testing it seems that
2004 Aug 04
0
Bogus patent applications (was: [RANT] ... Broadvoice)
Jayson Vantuyl wrote:
> Mmmmmm. I'm should patent that.
> Something like "Patent for Using Spam
> Filters to Block Stuff That Isn't Spam" or
> something equally obvious. I like it.
That won't make it even past the sloppiest examiner. You
would have to wrap it up nicely and present it as
something novel, like so ...
-------------------------
Method and
2009 Aug 13
0
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Ioannis Nousias wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I
> want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are
> chained together. The documentation mentions something about calling
> certain methods from within gdb, but isn't there some option when
> invoking the compiler
2009 Aug 07
2
sieve vacation response
Hello,
we're implementing a dovecot 1.2.1 with sieve 0.1.7 and managesieve 0.11.7.
We're having problems with creating sieve scripts so that vacation works.
Our script looks like this:
require ["fileinto", "vacation"];
if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] "*someone at example.com*" {
if not header :matches "X-Spam-Status"
2015 Apr 04
3
speaking of sieve scripts... how to selectively not send vacation autoreply
Don't need to block anyone like in the "Re: Dovecot Oy merger with
Open-Xchange AG" thread, but when I have my vacation recipie active, I'd like
it to NOT reply to certain addresses.
I tried the following, you can see the section with
if header :contains "addressIdontwant at repliedtoo.tld"
is commented out, once I'd added that section, no Vacation messages
2008 Dec 15
2
cmusieve, vacation and error at file_dotlock_create
Hello again,
managesieve is working. Now I tried a vacation script with the
result that the vacation response is sent but I got he following
error:
deliver(test1 at xxxxxx.de): 2008-12-15 14:34:28 Error: file_dotlock_create(/home/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir/.dovecot.lda-dupes) failed: No such file or directory
/home/vmail/xxxxxx.de/test1/Maildir/ is the correct dir, there
are the other files like
2009 Aug 13
2
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
Chris Lattner wrote:
On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Ioannis Nousias wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to get a graphviz output (DOT) of a code I'm compiling. I
> want to see the DFG/CFG of the LLVM assembly, how the operations are
> chained together. The documentation mentions something about calling
> certain methods from within gdb, but isn't there some option when
>
2004 Jun 21
0
Your message was flagged as possible spam (PR#6996)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format...
------------=_1087785732-11892-7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
********************************
IMPORTANT: This informational message was sent from an unattended mailbox. Do not respond directly to this message. Please read it in its entirety for ways you can