Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches similar to: "Retrieving p-values and z values from lmer output"
2006 Jul 04
1
lmer print outs without T
Hi,
I have been having a tedious issue with lmer models with lots of
factors and lots of levels. In order to get the basic information at
the beginning of the print out I also have to generate these enormous
tables as well. Is there a method command to leave off all of the
effects and correlations? Or, do I have to go to string commands?
2006 Jul 15
3
names() function and lmer()
Hello All,
I would like to retrieve some of the results from the lmer(...)
function in library lme4. If I run a model, say
fm.1 <- lmer(y ~ 1 + (1 | x), data = dog)
and try names(fm.1), I get NULL. Is there anyway to retrieve the information?
Thanks
2014 Apr 03
1
summary of lme4.0 model in package
Dear all,
My package has Depends: lme4.0 in the DESCRIPTION. I need to extract the fixed effect of a model and their standard errors. I use coef(summary(model)) inside a function to do that. Model is the output of a call to glmer() from the lme4.0 package.
coef(summary(model)) throws an error: $ operator is invalid for atomic vectors
I have tracked it down to a problem with summary(model)
2009 Jul 13
0
testing equality of two dependent correlations + normality issue
Hi, I am turning to you with a (hopefully simple?) stats question. I would
like to test equality of two correlation coefficients in a setting with
three variables X,Y,Z, i.e. equality of r(X,Y) and r(Z,Y). I have found a
formula to transform the "2 dependent correlations difference" to
t-distribution with N-3 df:
t = (rxy - rzy)* SQRT[{(n - 3)(1 + rxz)}/ {2(1 - rxy^2 - rxz^2 - rzy^2 +
2017 Dec 26
1
identifying convergence or non-convergence of mixed-effects regression model in lme4 from model output
Hi R community!
I've fitted three mixed-effects regression models to a thousand
bootstrap samples (case-resampling regression) using the lme4 package in
a custom-built for-loop. The only output I saved were the inferential
statistics for my fixed and random effects. I did not save any output
related to the performance to the machine learning algorithm used to fit
the models (REML=FALSE).
2013 Oct 09
4
[LLVMdev] Subregister liveness tracking
On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:06 PM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> wrote:
> What I didn't mention in r192119 is that mthi/lo clobbers the other sub-register only if the contents of hi and lo are produced by mult or other arithmetic instructions (div, madd, etc.) It doesn't have this side-effect if it is produced by another mthi/lo. So I don't think making mthi/lo clobber the