similar to: Plot with Julian dates.

> > I might as well add to the offtopic thread... why are natuical miles longer than "regular" miles? Andrew A nautical mile is 1 minute of latitude. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040112/6658a905/attachment.htm

Hi, I am trying to get R to return just the slope of a linear regression line, but it seems that R has to return both the slope and the name of the slope. For example, > a=coef(lm(y~miles)) > a (Intercept) miles 360.3778 -7.2875 > names(a) [1] "(Intercept)" "miles" > a[1] (Intercept) 360.3778 > a[2] miles -7.2875 I don't understand the

Chad, et al, In addition to Doug’s excellent technical update, I’ll note that we are starting to have some discussions on the DOE side with PGI about establishing a more formal review team made up of some key LLVM stakeholders to help smooth the way for a broader public rollout of the Flang code base and eventual integration. We’ll probably rely on Hal and others here to help us figure out who

My system: Suse 9.3 Prof. I downloaded Wine: wine-0.9.7-SuSELinux100.i586.rpm. I get the message libstdc++.so.6 not available. What can I do? Please note: I am not a linux expert. What little I know, I acquired by myself. Regards, suren -- The woods are lovely dark and deep But I have promises to keep And miles to go before I sleep And miles to go before I sleep (Robert Frost)

--- Miles Egan <miles@caddr.com> wrote: > Are there rpms for flac available? I'm not aware of any official maintainers but supposedly the gstreamer guys (http://gstreamer.sf.net) have a spec file for it. I am going to look into it in the next couple of days but when 1.0 comes out I'm sure RPMs will pop up pretty quickly. Josh __________________________________________________

Hi Chad, I can tell you that progress is being made on PGI's side; I'll let Doug/Rob provide more detailed updates. -Hal ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chad Rosier" <mcrosier at codeaurora.org> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "flang-dev" <flang-dev at googlegroups.com>, "douglas miles (PGI)"

> On May 26, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Neely, Rob via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Chad, et al, > > In addition to Doug’s excellent technical update, I’ll note that we are > starting to have some discussions on the DOE side with PGI about > establishing a more formal review team made up of some key LLVM > stakeholders to help smooth the way for a broader

Hi Chad - We have a functional Fortran compiler, with the PGI front-end bridged directly to LLVM, all of our Fortran runtime libraries integrated, and the Clang driver adapted for use with the Fortran compiler. We're working with a few users at DOE who are trying to compile big applications with a binary version of the compiler. Work is ongoing to migrate the source code into an LLVM-style

Hello all Is there a method/package in R in which I can do regressions for more than 50 independent variables ? Regards The woods are lovely, dark and deep But I have promises to keep And miles before I go to sleep And miles before I go to sleep ----- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

No closed doors intended here. Just a recognition that for something like an initial review to be useful, we probably have to be a bit careful in how many people we can reasonably involve before it could get unwieldy, and trying to be respectful of people’s time if we can nail down 90% of issues with a smaller group before going broader. I think we’d be fine with opening up the WebEx presentations

This process is certainly only open to a select group, so pragmatically it's closed. I can understand that it will certainly not be an easy process once it's public due to the amount of code and complexity. Maybe someone can comment on a specific issue - When we ported our Fortran front-end to target llvm, we found that Fortran ENTRY doesn't map very well to llvm ir. Can anyone who

Hi all, I wrote a r program as below: x <- 1:10 y <- c(3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3) fit <- lm(log(y) ~ x) summary(fit) And I expect to get some error message from R, because "y" is constant. But, I got the message as below: > summary(fit) Call: lm(formula = log(y) ~ x) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -6.802e-17 -3.933e-17 -1.063e-17 1.807e-17

Prueba algo así: library(ggplot2) datos <- read.table("Downloads/pec.csv", header = T, sep = ";", dec = ",") datos$Miles <- as.numeric(gsub("\\.", "", as.character(datos$Miles))) datos$hora <- strptime(datos$hora, format = "%H:%M") ggplot(datos, aes(x = hora, y = Miles)) + geom_line() + scale_x_datetime(date_breaks =

For those of you coming from out of the area and who may not be familiar with the bay area. TRAVEL: The closest airport is San Jose International Airport (SJC; 10 miles away). There is also San Francisco Internation Airport (SFO; 43 miles away) or Oakland (OAK; 49 miles away). IMHO, I would choose SJC, then SFO, and lastly OAK, depending upont he prices. HOTELS: The Cypress Hotel

The application I''m developing allows people to create events in their local area; as part of this feature I want to display a list of, say, the five most recent events within 30 miles of a person''s location. I have a User model and a Profiles model which contains the user''s location (city, state, zip code) among other non-related personal information. So what I would

So in order to answer the background and backbone questions here is the system as it is. I hope this isn't too much for the list but I'll post it in response to a few inquiries. The current system is quite interesting. We have an office in a town that is about 50 miles from the ski area. The ski area is powered 100% of of generators and the telephone access and internet access goes from

Hello all, I have a syntax question. How does one refer to a field brought in via a has_one/belongs_to relationship in a form helper? Basically, I have two models: class Resource < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :other_thing end class OtherThing < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :resource end It has the normal id-resource_id foreign key relationship. OtherThing has two fields, plus the

Hi all, I've got some functioning code that I've literally taken hours to write. My 'R' coding is getting better...it used to take days :) I know I've done a poor job of optimizing the code. In addition, I'm missing an important step and don't know where to put it. So, three questions: 1) I'd like the resulting output to be sorted on distance (ascending) and

Hello everyone, my name is Miles, I am fairly new to asterisk. I have recently begun to learn asterisk and I have a couple of questions. 1. After installing asterisk using the following instructions; a. sudo mkdir /usr/src/asterisk &amp;&amp; cd /usr/src/asterisk b. sudo wget http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/releases/asterisk-1 1.2.1.tar.gz c. sudo tar

Sí, la primera reunión de la temporada será el 8 de este mes. Un saludo, Carlos J. Gil Bellosta http://www.datanalytics.com El 3 de septiembre de 2016, 23:52, Ruben Tobalina Ramirez < lagrimaescrita en gmail.com> escribió: > Muchas gracias a todos! > > Pues si, Eric, R a veces me vuelve loco, tiene una lógica muy particular. > Miraré el libro, que lattice no lo he usado