similar to: fixed effects constant in mcmcsamp

Hi all, I have some difficulties with the lme function and so this is my problem. Supoose i have the following model y_(ijk)=beta_j + e_i + epsilon_(ijk) where beta_j are fixed effects, e_i is a random effect and epsilon_(ijk) is the error. If i want to estimate a such model, i execute >lme(y~vec.J , random~1 |vec .I ) where y is the vector of my data, vec.J is a factor object

Greetings, The following question has come up in an off-list discussion. Is it possible to construct a regular expression 'rex' out of two given regular expressions 'rex1' and 'rex2', such that a character string X matches 'rex' if and only if X matches 'rex1' AND X does not match 'rex2'? The desired end result can be achieved by logically combining

Dear all I need to run an anova from a factorial model y_{ijk}=\alpha_i+\beta_j+(\alpha\beta)_{ij}+e_{ijk} and calculate type II and III sums of square, but I have an empty cells, so anova function from package car fail. (I believe) y<-c(7,13,6,10,8,11,8,3,7,5,65) a<-as.factor(c(1,1,2,2,3,3,3,1,1,1,2)) b<-as.factor( c(rep(1,7),rep(2,4)) ) table(b,a) # cell (2,3) is empty

Hello everyone, I wanted to ask if there is an R-package to fit the following Poisson regression model log(\lambda_{ijk}) = \phi_{i} + \alpha_{j} + \beta_{k} i=1,\cdots,N (subjects) j=0,1 (two levels) k=0,1 (two levels) treating the \phi_{i} as nuinsance parameters. Thank you very much -- -Tony [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear useRs, I've just encountered a serious problem involving the F-test being carried out in aov() and anova(). In the provided example, aov() is not making the correct F-test for an hypothesis involving the expected mean square (EMS) of a factor divided by the EMS of another factor (i.e., instead of the error EMS). Here is the example: Expected Mean Square

Hello, I'm trying to fit a special kind of proportional odds model from: Whitehead et al. (2001). Meta-analysis of ordinal outcome using individual patient data. Statistics in medicine 20: 2243-2260. (model 2) The data are as follows: library(nlme) library(geepack) library(Design) library(MASS) options(contrasts=c("contr.SAS","contr.poly")) counts <-

Dear R users: I've a problem with lme function, when I want to model an unbalanced two-way anova, with 2 random factors say t and b. My two models are: model1- y(ijk) = beta+b(i)+t(j)+epsilon(ijk) model2- y(ijk)= beta+b(i)+t(j)+b:t(ij)+epsilon(ijk) beta overall mean effect The data.frame is X t b med celda 1 1 10 1 1 1 12 1 1 1 11 1 1 2 13 2 1

Hi, I have fitted a generalized linear mixed effects model using lmer (library lme4), and the family = quasibinomial. I have tried to obtain a MCMC sample, but on calling mcmcsamp(model1, 1000) I get the following error which I don't understand at all: Error in .local(object, n, verbose, ...) : Update not yet written traceback() delivers: 4: .Call(mer_MCMCsamp, ans, object) 3:

Hello, I am a chemical student and I make use of 'lme/lmer function' to handle experiments in split-plot structures. I know about the mcmcsamp and I think that it's very promissory. I would like knowing "the concept behind" of the mcmcsamp function. I do not want the C code of the MCMCSAMP function. I would like to get the "pseudo-algorithm" to understanding that

Hello, R community, I have been using the lmer and mcmcsamp functions in R with some difficulty. I do not believe this is my code or data, however, because my attempts to use the sample code and 'sleepstudy' data provided with the lme4 packaged (and used on several R-Wiki pages) do not return the same results as those indicated in the help pages. For instance: > sessionInfo() R

Hi, I've got a linear mixed model created using lmer: A6mlm <- lmer(Score ~ division + (1|school), data=Age6m) (To those of you to whom this model looks familiar, thanks for your patience with this & my other questions.) Anyway, I was trying this to look at the significance of my fixed effects: A6post <- mcmcsamp(A6mlm, 50000) library(coda) HPDinterval(A6post) ..but I got this

I have written a function called mcsamp() that is a wrapper that runs mcmcsamp() and automatically monitors convergence and structures the inferences into vectors and arrays as appropriate. But I have run into a very little problem, which is that mcmcsamp() shortens the variable names. For example: > set.seed (1) > group <- rep (1:5,10) > a <- rnorm (5,-3,3) > y <-

Dear All, I've been using mcmcsamp() successfully with a few different mixed models but I can't get it to work with the following. Is there an obvious reason why it shouldn't work with a model of this structure ? *brief summary of objective: I want to test the effect of no-fishing marine reserves on the abundance of a target species. I have samples at coral reef sites inside and

Hello, I'm building a couple of mixed models using the lmer function. The actual modelling is going well, but doing some reading on the use of crossed random effects and the comparison of models with and without random effects it is clear that I need to generate some Markov Chain Monte Carlo samples. However, I'm struggling because everyone time I go to generate a sample I get the

I've got a problem with "mcmcsamp" used with glmer objects produced with "lmer" from the lme4 package. When calling mcmcsamp, I get the error Error in if (var(y) == 0) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed This does not occur with all models, but I can't find anything wrong with the dataset. If the error is in my data, can someone tell me what I am looking

I really hope sombody could help me with the following, I'm having problems accessing the random effect samples following the example on MCMCsamp: (fm1 <- lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (1|Subject) + (0+Days|Subject), sleepstudy)) set.seed(101); samp0 <- mcmcsamp(fm1, n = 1000, saveb=TRUE) str(samp0) Formal class 'merMCMC' [package "lme4"] with 9 slots ..@ Gp :

Hi folks, I have assumed that ratios of variance components (Fst and Qst in population genetics) could be estimated using the output of mcmcsamp (the series on mcmc sample estimates of variance components). What I have started to do is to use the matrix output that included the log(variances), exponentiate, calculate the relevant ratio, and apply either quantile or or HPDinterval to get

I've searched the help archives of both lists and apologize if I missed the answer to my question: Is there an update on developing mcmcsamp for glmer? I'm using R v. 2.7.2 (on our Unix server - will hopefully be updated soon) and 2.8.1 on my PC and get the message for both: gm1 <- glmer(cbind(incidence, size - incidence) ~ period + (1 | herd),family = binomial, data = cbpp)

Hi, I would appreciate help with the following model <<1>>= gunload <- read.table(hh('datasets/gunload.dat'), header = T) gunload$method <- factor(gunload$method, labels = c('new', 'old')) gunload$physique <- factor(gunload$group, labels = c('slight', 'average', 'heavy')) gunload$team9 <- factor(rep(1:9, each = 2)) @ This

Dear all, I am running a mixed model using lmer. In order to obtain CI of individual coefficients I use mcmcsamp. However, I need advice which values that are most appropriate to present in result section of a paper. I have not used mixed models and lmer so much before so my question is probably very naive. However, to avoid to much problems with journal editors and referees addicted to