similar to: Ambitious newbie with some ongoing Q's

Hi everybidy Does anybody knows the code in R relate to MANCOVA???I saw somewhere lm(Y`...) but ma not so sure.. Thanks in advance!! Paola -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/MANCOVA-tp4647735.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Anyone I'm wondering how to make confidence intervals (bonferroni or simultaneous) when using Manova and Mancova in Splus. I 'm doing manova with four variables on length and four variables on weight (of salmon). The measuring is done on different time points. I'm working on my master in the field between biostatistics and fishery biology. If anyone knows a good book on mancova

Dear all, I'm trying to compare two sets of variables, the first set is composed exclusively of numerical variables and the second regroups factors and numerical variables. I can't use a Manova because of this inclusion of numerical variables in the second set. The solution should be to perform a Mancova, but I didn't find any package that allow this type of test. I've already

Hello, I need to perform a mixed-model (with nesting) MANCOVA, using Type III sums of squares. I know how to perform each of these types of tests individually, but I am not sure if performing a mixed-model MANCOVA is possible. Please let me know. Erika <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< Erika Crispo, PhD candidate

I am having a hard time understanding how to perform a "repeated measures" type of ANOVA with R. When reading the document found here: http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Lemon-kickstart/kr_repms.html I find that there is a reference to a function make.rm () that is supposed to rearrange a "one row per person" type of frame to a "one row per observation" type

Hello, I have subjects in 4 groups: X1, X2, X3, X4. There are 33 subjects in group X1, 35 in X2, 31 in X3, and 46 in group X4. I have 7 continuous response variables (actually integers, approximately normal) measured for each subject: Y1 to Y7, and two continuous covariates C1, C2 (they are both integers). I want to perform all pairwise comparisons for each response variable between groups.

Dear List, I am trying to analyze a dataset where I have 1 continuous between-item variable (C), and 2 factorial within-item variables (3- and 2-level: F3, F2). I'm interested in whether slope of C is different from 0 at different combinations of F3 and F2, and whether it varies between these combinations. And unfortunately I need a decent anova-like table with p-values. The reason is that

From: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr> --- nvkm/subdev/pwr/fuc/kernel.fuc | 13 +++++++++++++ nvkm/subdev/pwr/fuc/nv108.fuc.h | 25 +++++++++++-------------- nvkm/subdev/pwr/fuc/nva3.fuc.h | 23 ++++++++++------------- nvkm/subdev/pwr/fuc/nvc0.fuc.h | 23 ++++++++++------------- nvkm/subdev/pwr/fuc/nvd0.fuc.h | 23 ++++++++++------------- 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 53

Needs to be done after wait-for-VBLANK, and NVA3 requires register writes in between. Rather than hard-coding register writes, just split out fb_disable and fb_enable. Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/pwr.h | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h | 14 ++++++++++++++

The platform device does not use the common nouveau_pwr_init() to initialize the PWR, but it does need the .prob() be assigned to avoid NULL pointer dereference in graph/nve4.c. Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> --- v2: this patch is added since v2. (v1 is the RFC actually) nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c | 2 +- nvkm/subdev/pwr/priv.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> wrote: > > On 12/22/2014 05:11 PM, Vince Hsu wrote: >> >> The platform device does not use the common nouveau_pwr_init() to >> initialize >> the PWR, but it does need the .prob() be assigned to avoid NULL pointer >> dereference in graph/nve4.c. > > s/prob/pgob/ :-( > Will fix in

On 12/22/2014 05:11 PM, Vince Hsu wrote: > The platform device does not use the common nouveau_pwr_init() to initialize > the PWR, but it does need the .prob() be assigned to avoid NULL pointer > dereference in graph/nve4.c. s/prob/pgob/ :-( Will fix in next version. > > Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> > --- > > v2: this patch is added since v2. (v1

Hi all, I'm having trouble getting access to the pwr. This is on Ubuntu Lucid Lynx, 64 bit. I'm installing pwr via packages.install('pwr'), and loading it via library(pwr), both of which appear successful. Strangely, I never get access to the pwr object in R. I tried installing it to /usr/local/lib/R/site-library and ~/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library. I also tried installing it

Noticed these in both the disable (which we'll be getting rid of in a moment) and the atomic disable callbacks: both callback types check whether or not there's actually a CRTC assigned to the given encoder. However, as ->atomic_disable and ->disable will never be called without a CRTC assigned to the given encoder there's no point in this check. So just remove it.

I'm trying to join a Samba 3.0.4 (compiled from source on Debian) to an Active Directory as a member server. I believe Kerberos is configured correctly as kinit creates a ticket for the realm. Executables appear to have support for Kerberos and LDAP (smbd -b | grep KRB and grep LDAP) return OK. When I try to join the AD with net ads join -U myadminusername I'm prompted for my

Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/pwr.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h | 16 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnva3.c | 318 +++++++++++++++++++-- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/pwr/fuc/memx.fuc | 111 +++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/pwr/fuc/os.h | 5 +

Hello, I've encountered a very weird issue with the method subset(), or maybe this is something I don't know about said method that when you're subsetting based on the columns of a data frame you can only use constants (0.1, 2.3, 2.2) instead of variables? Here's a look at my data frame called 'ea.cad.pwr': *>ea.ca.pwr[1:5,] MAF OR POWER 1 0.02 0.01 0.9999 2 0.02

Hello guys, I've prepared a patch based on my findings for the bbswitch module (https://github.com/Lekensteyn/acpi-stuff/tree/master/bbswitch). This adds a proper check whether a _DSM function is supported or not and make OFF / ON for vga_switcheroo work for nVidia Optimus models. The patch is based against the mainline kernel. It has been tested on my Clevo B7130 laptop running kernel 3.2

hi. why choose 1.4? correctly 1.3 FreeBSD hq.local 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #1: Tue Jul 31 19:48:36 MSK 2012 root at hq.local:/sys/amd64/compile/HQ amd64 ugen1.3: <DELL> at usbus1 uhid0: <DELL Dell UPS Rack 1920W HV, class 0/0, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 3> on usbus1 root at hq: # usbconfig ugen0.1: <EHCI root HUB Intel> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps)

Hi, I am trying to sort out a discrepancy between power calculations results between me and another statistician. I use R but I am not sure what she uses. It is on the proportions test and so I have been using pwr.prop.test. I think I have tracked the problem down to pwr.prop.test not using the continuity correction for the test (I did this by using the java applet from