similar to: eliminating a do loop

Hello all, I'm having a problem concerning choosing columns from a dataset in a function. I'm writing a function for data input etc., which first reads the data, and then does several data manipulation tasks. The function can be then used, with just giving the path of the .txt file where the data is being held. These datasets consists of over 20 different analytes. Though, statistical

Dear R-listers, I am trying to compute simultaneous confidence intervals with simint from the package multcomp. 230 measures (abundance) have been taken in 23 sites (factor) of a data.frame (donnees: a file can be sent on request, saved with save(donnees,file="donnees")). I would like to get all pairwise comparisons with : mc<- simint(ren~ID,type="Tukey",data=donnees) I

Dear R-developeRs, Attached follows a patch against svn 34959 that adds the printing of p-values to the TukeyHSD.aov function in stats package. I also updated the corresponding documentation file and added a 'see also' reference to the simint function of the multcomp package. As it was already brought up in a previous thread [1] in R-help, one can obtain the adjusted

Hello everyone: I'm a new member of this group. I have a question about "oneway.test". When I use "anova(lm(....))" to analysis the ANOVA, I can get the information about Sum Sq and Mean Sq. (The R code and the results are as follows.)

Dear R-helpers, I am developing a Mixed-Effects model for a study of immunoassays using 'lme4' library. The study design is as follows: 10 samples were run using 7 different immunoassays, 3 times each, in duplicates. Data attached. I have developed the following model: c.lme <- lmer(Result~SPL + (SPL|Assay/Run) -1, data=data) This model has excellent predictions - the Rsquared of

HI I'm a student in chemical engineering, and i have to implement an algoritm about FIVE PARAMETERS INTERPOLATION for a calibration curve (dose, optical density) y = a + (c - a) /(1+ e[-b(x-m]) where x = ln(analyte dose + 1) y = the optical absorbance data a = the curves top asymptote b = the slope of the curve c = the curves bottom asymptote m = the curve X intercept Have you never seen

# R for Windows will not send your bug report automatically. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs at r-project.org # ###################################################### This report is joint from Richard Heiberger <rmh at temple.edu> and Burt Holland <bholland at temple.edu>. Burt Holland is the coauthor

Hi, I need to construct a formula programaticly, and pass it to a function such as the linear mixed model lme. The help says it requires "a two-sided linear formula object describing the fixed-effects part of the model" but I do not know how to create this formula. I have tried various things using formula(x, ...), as.formula(object, env = parent.frame()) and as.Formula(x, ...)

Try this data(Assay) as1 <- lme(logDens~sample*dilut, data=Assay, random=pdBlocked(list( pdIdent(~1), pdIdent(~sample-1), pdIdent(~dilut-1)))) update(as1,random=pdCompSymm(~sample-1)) update(as1,random=pdCompSymm(~sample-1)) update(as1,random=pdCompSymm(~sample-1)) update(as1,random=pdCompSymm(~sample-1)) I'm

Greetings ~ I need some assistance determining an appropriate approach to analyzing multivariate binary response data, and how to do it in R. The setting: Data from an assay, wherein 6-hours-post-fertilization zebrafish embryos (n=20, say) are exposed in a vial to a chemical (replicated 3 times, say), and 5 days later observed for the presence/absence (1/0) of defects in several organ systems

I used the multcomp package sometime back for doing multiple comparisons. I see that it has been updated and the methods like simint are no longer supported. When I run the program it prompts to me to use glht. How do I get the lower and upper conf int and the pValues using glht? Does anyone have an example? Thanks ../Murli [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi. I have data which i would want to assess the degree of agreement between two assays, e.g., to evaluate reproducibility or for inter-rater reliability. I have used the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It looks good ranginging between 0.90 to 0.998. Though this looks good. I am told the Concordance correlation coefficient will give a better picture of how reproducible the assay

Here it is again, hope this is more clear I am using the following data (only a small subset is given): Habitat Fungus.yield Birch 20.83829053 Birch 22.9718181 Birch 22.28216829 Birch 24.23136797 Birch 22.32147961 Birch 20.30783598 Oak 27.24047258 Oak 29.7730014 Oak 30.12608508 Oak 25.76088669 Oak 30.14750974 Hornbeam 17.05307949 Hornbeam 15.32805111 Hornbeam 18.26920177 Hornbeam 21.30987049

Hi, this should be an easy one, but I can't figure it out. I have a vector of tests, with their units between brackets (if they have units). eg tests <- c("pH", "Assay (%)", "Impurity A(%)", "content (mg/ml)") Now I would like to hava a function where I use a test as input, and which returns the units like: f <- function (x) sub("\\)",

Hello, In my code I found something that looks like an anomaly, I found a reproducible example in which I am just trying to compare each row in a data frame against the first row: a<-data.frame(row=c("B","C","B"),column=c(2,2,10),assay=c("Assay1","Assay1","Assay1"),plate=c(1,1,1),stringsAsFactors=FALSE) apply(a[1:2,],1,function(x) {

I know that there are quite a few packages out that there for cluster analysis. The problem that I am facing is finding a package that will not incorporate all my samples into clusters but just the samples that fit a threshold (that I have not set yet and may need help finding the right level) for genotyping. It should be able to "no call" samples outside the clusters. It also needs to

Is there a good way in R to impute values which exist, but are less than the detection level for an assay? Thanks, Jonathan Williams OPTIMA Radcliffe Infirmary Woodstock Road OXFORD OX2 6HE Tel +1865 (2)24356

Hi, First let me thank you for the incredible help and resource that this forum is. I am trying to compare the repeated measurement of more than 100 analytes that have been take in 70 subjects at 2 time points adjusted for the time difference of sample times(TimeDifferenceDays), therefore I wanted to do it with a function that allows me to do all at once. (131 is the column difference that

I am trying to find the best way to save the follwoing object I am creating library(multcomp) data(recovery) Dcirec<-simint(minutes~blanket, data=recovery, conf.level=0.9, alternative="less") I am probably not doing it the most efficient way I think. Here is what I am doing a<-print(Dcirec) write(a,file="mult_test.dat", append=T) or save(Dcirec,

Dear list, As a reply to my recent mail: > simint and TukeyHSD work for aov objects. > Can someone point me to similar functions for lme objects? Douglas Bates wrote There aren't multiple comparison methods for lme objects because it is not clear how to do multiple comparisons for these. I don't think the theory of multiple comparisons extends easily to lme models. One could