similar to: Predict with loess

Using hccm() I got a heteroscedasticity correction factor on the diagonal of the return matrix, but I don't know how to incorporate this into my linear model: METHOD 1: > OLS1 <- lm(formula=uer92~uer+low2+mlo+spec+degree+hit) Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) -0.0623377 0.0323461 -1.927 0.057217 . uer 0.2274742 0.0758720

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Javier Martinez <javier at jmartinez.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working in adding support for 64-bit integers to my target. I'm using > LLVM to decompose the 64-bit integer operations by using 32-bit registers > wherever possible and emulating support where not. When looking at the bit > shift decomposition I saw what seems to be a

Hello, I'm working in adding support for 64-bit integers to my target. I'm using LLVM to decompose the 64-bit integer operations by using 32-bit registers wherever possible and emulating support where not. When looking at the bit shift decomposition I saw what seems to be a bug in the implementation. The affected function is ExpandShiftWithUnknownAmountBit in LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp.

Hi all, Is it mandatory to add device mem to jails to enable network via the gateway? Left ezjail with FreeBSD-6.3 (and a hardware replacement of my server) and am now starting again with FreeBSD-7.1. Early this week, I upgraded from 7.0 to 7.1 (not having 'used' jails on 7.0). After creating the jail with `ezjail-admin update -i` I created a 'ports build' jail `ezjail-admin

Hello, I have a Dell 2950 with a Perc 5/i, two 300GB 15K SAS drives in a RAID0 array. I am considering going to ZFS and I would like to get some feedback about which situation would yield the highest performance: using the Perc 5/i to provide a hardware RAID0 that is presented as a single volume to OpenSolaris, or using the drives separately and creating the RAID0 with OpenSolaris and ZFS? Or

Dear R-users, During a fit procedure in a Logistic prediction model I encounter the following problem: error: in catg (xi, name=nam, label=lab: X has <2 category levels The following code is used: fit <-lrm(MRI_Diag_RC ~ factor(O4_1r) + N6_1r + leeftijd + LO1 + LO2 + LO3+ LO4+ LO5+ LO6+ LO7+ LO8+ LO9+ LO10+ LO11+ LO12+ LO13 + LO14+ LO15+ LO16+ LO17+ LO18+ LO19+ LO20+ LO21+ LO22+ LO23+

Hello Shorewall list, I''m a happy Shorewall user since a few years now and everything works fine for me except one thing that I try to implement since a week, the multi-isp. I''ve downloaded the 2.4.0 Stable release yesterday and tried the RC2 since a week. My config is a Debian running a kernel 2.4.27 home made with the CONNMARK.diff patch applied I''m using 2 ISP,

Hello, I already consulted related lists @freebsd.org [1,2] but I have remained unsuccessful to solve the following issue: VPN works for an internal IPv4 subnet, but I doesn't for an internal IPv6 subnet with ULAs. To be honest, I don't have any experience setting up a local IPv6; so I guess that I'm doing something wrong here. For those that know FreeBSD: The main aim is to connect

Hi all, llvm newbie here. I'm trying to branch based on a vector compare. I've found a slow way (below) which goes through memory. Is there some idiom I'm missing so that it would use for instance movmsk for SSE or vcmpgt & cr6 for altivec? Or do I need to resort to calling the intrinsic directly? Thanks, Stephen. %16 = fcmp ogt <4 x float> %15, %cr %17 =

> I recently did something like this. I have a webserver in a jail that > needs to talk to a database, and the webserver is the only thing that > should talk to the databse. > My solution was to use 2 jails: one for the webserver, and another for the > database. > Jail 1: > * runs webserver > * binds to real interface with real, routable IP > Jail 2: > *

hello I built logistic regression model. To model check I used stepAIC. But I don't know how it is interpreted . I could not any find any explanation about it For instance which model is preferable ? What are the critarias to choose beter model I will appreciate if you give me an explanation ? models --------- > lo1.step$anova Stepwise Model Path Analysis of Deviance Table Initial

Hi, I'm working with timeseries data. The values are every 5 seconds and each series can last up to 4-5 days. To generate the x-axis labels, I'm doing the following: ========================= # Variable for displaying hours on the x-axis rtime <<- as.POSIXct(round(range(timedata), "hours")) # Variable for displaying days on the x-axis stime <<-

Hello all, please, can anyone advertise me some channel banks, which can operate with E1 (30 FXS)? Rack-mountable option is welcome. I've tried to google, but I've not found nothing appropriate. More than one E1 link is welcome too. Everyone channel banks, which I've found, was between T1 and FXS(O), but I have Digium E1 card and I want use for one line 30 channels and not only 24.

I am trying to (semi) calculate the confidence intervals for a loess smoother (function: loess()), but have been thus far unsuccessful. The CI for the loess predicted values, yhat, are apparently yhat +- t*s * sqrt(w^2), where s is the residual sum of squares and w is the weight function Correct me of I'm wrong, but R uses the tricubic function (1-abs(z)^3)^3, where z = (x-xi)/h, where h

Hello, I have configured jail for users with sshd ftpd and auth. I started this jail on IP 127.0.0.10(there is an alias on lo0 interface), there was not any bigger problem to start it. But i have a problem with internet in this jail. I can log in to this jail through ssh or ftpd but i can't connect to the internet. I try to set up some kind of nat but it doesn't work. Can anybody help me

Hi all, I read the setup at http://www.blackh0le.net/articles/vpn-dun-howto.html to setup my VPN. However, I'm having a problem which I think is proxy-ARP not working. I like to ask you to see if you know what's going on. When I ping 10.77.1.1 from windows XP machine the packets get to the 10.77.1.1 machine, but they don't have a return path to get back. When I do ping the windows

anova() on three or more objects behaves inconsistently in R. In R anovalist.lm does a sequential ANOVA using pairwise F tests, ignoring all the other objects, so the larger of the two models provides the denominator. In S anova.lmlist uses the denominator from the largest model (smallest residual df) in the set, as does anova.glmlist in both. I suggest that R's anovalist.lm is wrong (that

Hi Stephen, > Hi all, llvm newbie here. welcome! > I'm trying to branch based on a vector compare. I've found a slow way (below) > which goes through memory. Is there some idiom I'm missing so that it would use > for instance movmsk for SSE or vcmpgt & cr6 for altivec? I don't think you are missing anything: LLVM IR has no support for horizontal operations like

I'm setting up a server environment where I've got a bunch of jails running using aliased IPs on the same interface. I'd like to be able to use ipfw to place limits on the traffic between jails, but I'm running into problems. When I use tcpdump to look at TCP traffic from one jail to another, it shows both the source and destination IP for the packets as being the IP assigned to

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:17:07AM +0200, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > I want to serve IPv4 subnets 10.1.0.0/16 (machine A) and 10.2.0.0/16 > (machine B), and IPv6 subnets fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1::/96 (machine A) and > fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 (machine B) respectively. The jails are > connected on lo1. [...] > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/klaas/tinc-up > ifconfig