similar to: weird behaviour of summary.default

Hi, I am using R's grep function to find patterns in vectors of strings. The number of patterns I would like to match is 7,700 (of different sizes). I noticed that I get an error message when I do the following: data <- array() for (j in 1:length(x)) { array[j] <- length(grep(paste(patterns[1:7700], collapse = "|"), x[j], value = T)) } When I break this up into 4 chunks of

Hi all. I'm trying to install the packages Rstreams and RPgSQL, but with no success. I did R INSTALL name package but if I try library(Rstreams) I get the following error: Error in library.dynam("Rstreams",pkg,lib): dynamic library 'Rstreams' not found Error in library(Rstreams): .First.lib failed Where did I go wrong? I'm using R 1-1-1 on a Debian GNU/Linux box.

I was wondering if it would make sense to change the default behavior of the following: summary(15555L) ## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. ## 15560 15560 15560 15560 15560 15560 summary.default on numeric values rounds values (not just presentation) to getOption("digits")-3L (or four) digits by default, making those values surprising and less suitable for

Dear all, the number of significant digits in summary default is digits = max(3, getOption("digits") - 3) on my platform this results to be 4. The point is that if you have, say, integer data of magnitude greater than 10^3 the command summary will produce heavily rounded results. A simple example follow: > x <- c(123456,234567,345678) > x [1] 123456 234567 345678 >

Hello, I get > summary(E) level nodes ave_nodes time Min. : 1 Min. : 1.00 Min. : 10.71 Min. : 0.0000 1st Qu.: 237414 1st Qu.: 2.00 1st Qu.: 19.70 1st Qu.: 0.0100 Median : 749229 Median : 3.00 Median : 27.01 Median : 0.0100 Mean : 767902 Mean : 49.85 Mean : 98.89 Mean : 0.2296 3rd

Hi, I have a few hundreds files with numerical information of different length but with the same column structure. I use the following code to get summary statistics fplist <- list.files(pattern=".*analysis") for (fp in fplist){ x2 <- read.delim(fp) summary(x2) } Summary gives something like: summary (x2) V1 V2

My data is called xc and has more than 15 variables. When I used summary(xc) it gave me the detail description of each variable. Summary(xc) Y1 x1 x2 x3 .. Min. :0.0000 Min. : 1.000 Min. : 1.000 Min. : 1.000 1st Qu. :0.0000 1st Qu.: 1.000 1st Qu.: 1.000 1st Qu.: 2.000 Median :1.0000 Median : 1.000

Dear friends, summary() doesn't give a good ouput style,e.g.: grass soiltem airtem gheight humidity altitude diluo :38 Min. :15.90 Min. :17.70 Min. : 8.00 Min. : 0.2360 high: 43 huanghuacai:32 1st Qu.:19.32 1st Qu.:22.60 1st Qu.:40.00 1st Qu.: 0.3190 low :119 hucao :46 Median :20.20 Median :25.30 Median :60.00

Hi, I am performing a two-way ANOVA (2 factors with 4 and 5 levels, respectively). If I'm interpreting the output of summary correctly, then the interaction between both factors is significant: ,---- | ## Two-way ANOVA with possible interaction: | > model1 <- aov(log(y) ~ xForce*xVel, data=mydataset) | | > summary(model1) | Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) |

Howdy, Should summary() print answers with different numbers of significant figures, as in the following? > dim(iv) [1] 3000 2 > summary(iv) X1 X2 Min. :-4.15261 Min. :-3.271520 1st Qu.:-0.66188 1st Qu.:-0.671205 Median : 0.01233 Median :-0.008175 Mean : 0.01121 Mean : 0.016815 3rd Qu.: 0.67778 3rd Qu.:

Dear R experts, we are preparing an R-package to compute the Oja Median which contains some C++ code in which random numbers are needed. To generate the random numbers we use the following Mersenne-Twister implementation: // MersenneTwister.h // Mersenne Twister random number generator -- a C++ class MTRand // Based on code by Makoto Matsumoto, Takuji Nishimura, and Shawn Cokus // Richard J.

Hi, Why when I do a summary on a table it cuts off the other variables? It says Other :58 or Other: 120. how can I get the summary for all the variables under ServLoad.Task and Server.Load and Avg. CPU and Max.CPU? Thanks, summary(probF) Reboot.Id ServLoad.Task Server.Load Avg.CPU Max.CPU Event.Log Min. : 2.00 120067_122395: 5

Hi all, Based upon an exchange with G?ran Brostr?m on R-Help today: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2016-February/435992.html there appears to be a bug in summary.data.frame() in the case where a data frame contains Date class columns that contain NA's and other columns, if present, do not. Example, modified from R-Help: x <- c(18000000, 18810924, 19091227, 19027233, 19310526,

Hi all, I have a question about transforming the data from summary function. Let's say I have a data frame like this: > x = data.frame(a = c(rep("lev1", 5), rep("lev2", 5)), b = c(rnorm(5)+2, rnorm(5))) > x a b 1 lev1 1.5964765 2 lev1 2.2945609 3 lev1 3.5285787 4 lev1 1.4439838 5 lev1 2.2948826 6 lev2 1.7063506 7 lev2 -0.4042742 8 lev2

Hi, It seems that there's a bug in summary, in the max. output... but max() alone works fine. > hw04.dframe$area ... [41] 1790 1380 1296 2745 798 2306 438649 1481 1559 2450 ... > summary(hw04.dframe) area Min. : 798 1st Qu.: 1349 Median : 1690 Mean : 6962 3rd Qu.: 2306 Max. :438600 ### should read 438649 or, to the point,

It is the old story of defined behaviour and expected outcomes. Hard to change now. So I would suggest you do something like this in your ~/.Rprofile: R> smry <- function(...) summary(..., digits=6) R> smry(155555L) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 155555 155555 155555 155555 155555 155555 R> Maybe call it Summary() instead. Dirk --

Hello, eveRybody, I've been trying to find the origin for the following formatting-"inconsistency": E. g., look at the number of digits in summary.defaults()'s output when NAs occur: in my example below the number of NA's is displayed as an integer, the rest as numeric (floating point numbers): > summary.default( c( 1:2, NA)) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu.

Full_Name: Sanford Weisberg Version: 1.9.1 OS: Win XP Submission from: (NULL) (160.94.148.2) > wm <- read.table(url("http://www.stat.umn.edu/~sandy/wmdata0.txt"), header=TRUE) > mean(wm$Spd1) [1] 7.7773 > summary(wm$Spd1) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 0.222 4.780 7.550 7.780 10.200 21.600 The mean of this variable DOES NOT ROUND to the value

Consider > summary(1:5) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 1 2 3 3 4 5 > summary(c(1:5,NA)) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. NA's 1 2 3 3 4 5 1 Wouldn't it be more stringent if "NA's" was also reported in the first case?? Regards S?ren

Dear all i use R only a few days and don't understand the difference between fivenum(x) und summary(x). > x [1] 20.77 22.56 22.71 22.99 26.39 27.08 27.32 27.33 27.57 27.81 28.69 29.36 [13] 30.25 31.89 32.88 33.23 33.28 33.40 33.52 33.83 33.95 34.82 > fivenum(x) [1] 20.770 27.080 29.025 33.280 34.820 > summary(x) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 20.77 27.14