similar to: progressive slowdown during script execution?

You should try to figure out how large x and y need to be, and allocate them before the computation. "Growing" objects like that in R is very, very, very bad, as you've found out. Andy From: Tim Alcon > > I'm an R novice, so I hope my question is a valid one. I'm trying to > run the following script in the current version of R. > > for (i in 1:1640){for

I believe the problem is here: cor1 <- cor(x1, y1, method="spearman") cor2 <- cor(x2, y2, method="spearman") The x's and y's are not looked for in data (i.e. NSE) but in the environment where the function was defined, which is standard evaluation. Change the above to: cor1 <- with(d, cor(x1, y1, method="spearman")) cor2 <- with(d, cor(x2, y2,

Hi. I am currently trying to run some Spearman correlations, and have encountered two issues. 1) When using cor.test() with a variable that includes ties, I get the "Cannot compute exact p-values with ties" error. I have read that this function now uses an asymptotic formula that allows for ties, so do not understand why I am getting this error. (I am running version 2.4.0.) I

R-Experts, Here below my R code working without error message but I don't get the results I am expecting. Here is the result I get: [1] "All values of t are equal to 0.28611928397257 \n Cannot calculate confidence intervals" NULL If someone knows how to solve my problem, really appreciate. Best, S ######################################################### # Difference in Spearman

Hello R gurus, I want to calculate the Spearman rho between two ranked lists. I am getting results with cor.test that differ in comparison to my own spearman function: > my.spearman function(l1, l2) { if(length(l1) != length(l2)) stop("lists must have same length") r1 <- rank(l1) r2 <- rank(l2) dsq <- sapply(r1-r2,function(x) x^2) 1 - ((6 * sum(dsq))

Dear R-users: I am runing R 1.6.2 with Windows XP. I try to calculate Pearson correlation and Spearman correlation of any pairwise columns of 8000 x 80 data matrix with missing values and randomize the matix 1000 times and calculate this two correlations again. The code bellow for Pearson is working fine but for Spearman got the error bellow for randomized data matrix and R console is stop

Hi all, I am trying to figure out the formula used by R's Spearman rho (using cor(method="spearman")) because I can't seem to get the same value as by calculating "by hand". Perhaps I'm using "cor" wrong, but I don't know where. Basically, I am running these commands: > y=read.table(file="tmp",header=TRUE,sep="\t") >

Pardon my ignorance, but is there a difference in cor.test between exact=FALSE and exact=NULL when method=spearman? Take for example: x<-c(1,2,2,3,4,5) y<-c(1,2,2,10,11,12) cor.test(x,y, method="spearman", exact=NULL) This gives an error message, Warning message: Cannot compute exact p-values with ties in: cor.test.default(x, y, method = "spearman", exact = NULL)

Arrrrr, I think I've found a bug in the behavior of the stats::cor function when NAs are present, but in case I'm missing something, could you look over this example and let me know what you think: > a = c(1,3,NA,1,2) > b = c(1,2,1,1,4) > cor(a,b,method="spearman", use="complete.obs") [1] 0.8164966 > cor(a,b,method="spearman",

Hi, How can I make the cor(x, y, method="spearman") call to produce an error when the input to it (x, y) produces an error? Here is a simple example: > a <- c(0, 1, 2) > b <- c(100, 2, 4) ## error: > log(a) [1] -Inf 0.0000000 0.6931472 ## error, as expected: > cor(log(a), log(b), method="pearson") [1] NaN ## not an error any more (not expected): >

Full_Name: Ian Wilson Version: R-1.8.0 OS: Windows (but own compilation) Submission from: (NULL) (139.133.7.38) the p-value is incorrect for cor.test using method "spearman" in R-1.8.0. This was not the case in R-1.7.1. Version R-1.8.0 on Windows > cor.test(rnorm(50),rnorm(50),method="spearman") Spearman's rank correlation rho data: rnorm(50) and rnorm(50) S

Dear all, Suppose my data frame is as follows: id price distance 1 2 4 1 3 5 ... 2 4 8 2 5 9 ... n 3 7 n 8 9 I would like to calculate the rank-order correlation between price and distance for each id. cor(price,distance,method = "spearman") calculate a correlation for all. Then I tried to use apply(data,list='id',cor(price , distance , method =

Hi, A following function was kindly provided by GGally?s maintainer, Barret Schloerke. function(data, mapping, ...) { p <- ggplot(data = data, mapping = mapping) + geom_point(color = I("blue")) + geom_smooth(method = "lm", color = I("black"), ...) + theme_blank() + theme(panel.border=element_rect(fill=NA, linetype =

Dear R-helpers, I would like to do a Spearman rank order test, and used the cor() function with the method "spearman". It gives me a number (correlation coefficient?) , but how can I get the p-value? Thank you for the help in advance! Regards, Anne-Katrin -- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I have a data set where I want the correlations between 2 variables conditional on a students grade level. This code works just fine. by(tmp[,c('mtsc07', 'DCBASmathscoreSPRING')], tmp$Grade, cor, use='complete', method='pearson') However, this generates an error by(tmp[,c('mtsc07', 'DCBASmathscoreSPRING')], tmp$Grade, cor, use='complete',

Hi, all. Yet another beginner to R : ) I wonder, how it's possible to get the value of a coefficient from the object produced by cor.test() ? > cor.test(a, b, method="spearman") Spearman's rank correlation rho data: a and b S = 21554.28, p-value = 2.496e-11 alternative hypothesis: true rho is not equal to 0 sample estimates: rho 0.6807955 Warning message: In

Dear R users, Does the results below make any sense? Can the the interval of the correlation coefficient be between *-1.0185* and -0.8265 at 95% confidence level? Liviu > library(boot) > data(mtcars) > with(mtcars, cor.test(mpg, wt, met="spearman")) Spearman's rank correlation rho data: mpg and wt S = 10292, p-value = 1.488e-11 alternative hypothesis: true rho is not

Hallo! Is there an error in cor to calculate Spearman correlation with cor if there are NA's? cor.test gives the correct result. At least there is a difference. Or am I doing something wrong??? Does anybody know something about this? a<-c(2,4,3,NA) b<-c(4,1,2,3) cor(a, b, method="spearman", use="complete.obs") # -0.9819805 cor.test(a, b,

Full_Name: Vladimir Obolonkin Version: tested in 2.0 to 2.4.1 OS: linux, win, mac Submission from: (NULL) (202.14.96.194) {{ Subject shortened manually -- to pass anti-spam filters Original-subject: Incorrect matrix of spearman correlations working \ large (24000 by 425 and 78 by 425 data frames) in 64-bit Linux machines;\ the same code gives correct results in 32-bits Win and

I encounter a statistic problem about correlation. I use R to test wether two variables are correlated or not. (pearson correlation) cor.test(x,y) give a p=5.87.... Because the x, y is not normal distributed (qqplot indicate that) I also perform (spearman rank correlation) cor.test(x,y,method="spearman") give a very significant result p<10e-4