similar to: (no subject)

Issue 1: <%= @pic %> instead of <% @pic %> -----Original Message----- From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org [mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of rails-spinoffs-request-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 11:13 PM To:

hi i think my example is very simple and straightforward so i''m not sure if it meets your needs (change revert:true to revert:false from a draggable after I drop it on a droppable so it doesn''t return to its original place.) i did this # 2 divs created here <script language="javascript"> new Draggable(''drag'', {revert: false});

Several years ago, before PHP introduced their built-in pfpro functions, I rolled my own crappy interface, which of course delegated to the commandline payflow client. I could certainly do the same in Ruby today. Thinking back on it, I realized at the time, and realize again now, that delegating this functionality to a commandline app is a security risk unless you''re the *only* user on

getSelectedGridData()[getSelectedRow()] = eval(response.responseText); I believe that will work. Greg ________________________________ From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org [mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Joe Hudson Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 12:56 PM To:

Hi, I''m using SQL Server. I have a BIT field. I have a fix and a question. This is a patch for a bug in the SQL Server adapter that causes any insert or update to fail: lib/active_record/connection_adapters/sqlserver_adapter.rb @@ -239,2 +239,2 @@ - when TrueClass then (column && column.type == :boolean ? "''t''" : "1")

I see what he is saying now. When you assign a click event with the Event.observe it does not allow you to call it with the $(''xxx'').onclick(); command as it''s looking for the onclick tag in the a tag. I''m stumped on a way to get this to work. Jon Whitcraft Web Application Developer Online Services - Indianapolis Motor Speedway (317) 492-8623

Perfect, thanks Marco, great help! Now, why didn''t I think of that? Lol! -----Original Message----- From: Marco M. Jaeger [mailto:mail-yVS5avHIROZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 2:02 PM To: ''www.dhtmlgoodies.com'' Subject: RE: FW: [Rails-spinoffs] Calendar widget Thank you Alf - I appreciate your fast response Marco M. Jaeger | Url:

Joe Athman St. Paul Travelers - IS Investments 651-310-7597 -----Original Message----- From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org [mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Athman,Joseph J Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 2:14 PM To: rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org Subject:

Yea that''s what I am seeing also. Think I got round this before by turning the structure into a table :( Andrew - Thanks for your input.. > -----Original Message----- > From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > [mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org] On > Behalf Of Andrew Tetlaw > Sent:

i''ve got an issue with integer columns in the database becoming strings in the model and I''m not sure why this is happening. perhaps someone can explain. given the following setup (simplified for example) tables: users ---------- id - int name - varchar(60) roles ---------- id - int name - varchar(60) roles_users (join table) ---------- role_id - int user_id - int

Joe, After removing all occurrences of charset=utf-8 from my headers I am still getting the same bug in IE. Currently, it''s Content-Type: text/html Any other suggestion? Nathan. > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:13:57 -0500 > From: "Joe Hudson" <joe-x8g0hQFNjJhWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> > Subject: RE: [Rails-spinoffs] [Prototype] onSuccess Event

Thank you very much, James Adam On 10/29/05, rails-request-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org <rails-request-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org> wrote: > Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:23:05 +0100 > From: James Adam <james.adam-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > Subject: Re: [Rails] Multiple rails instances, single database > To:

Dear Rails groups, thank you for all the previous helps in this group, and me being a newbie is getting more comfortable with rails and now I finish most of the scaffold modification without much problem. My question is(I know it''s absolutely basic questions but I''m a real outsider :~( ) I have been developing in my own pc, now my office ''s other people will test on it,

Never mind........it looks fine for me in Windows 2000 FireFox 1.5.0.3 -Andrew Martinez -----Original Message----- From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org [mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Martinez, Andrew Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 5:01 PM To:

Actually, I see there are two other prototype calls: Element.remove(''foo''); Which does a parentNode.removeChild(), and Element.update(''foo'', ''some html''); Which does element.innerHTML = ''some html'', and executes any script that is in the string you pass in. -----Original Message----- From:

To answer my own question, yes. I looked at the trunk and it passes the option on from Sortable. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org [mailto:rails-spinoffs- > bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Gregory Hill > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 12:51 PM > To:

If that doesn''t work, then you''ve done something wrong somewhere. ''Cause it works for IE for me and everyone else. The only advantage I see with the YUI toolkit is that it''ll defer attaching events to elements that do not yet exist in the DOM. Big whoop, only a sloppy programmer would try to attach an event to a non-existant element. With Prototype, you can

..lol... and I screwed up the option... one more time... var myActiveSpanBase = new ActiveSpan({color: "red"}); Object.extend($(''someSpan''), myActiveSpanBase); $(''someSpan'').setup(); Or, more concisely... Object.extend($(''someSpan''), new ActiveSpan({color: "blue"}); $(''someSpan'').setup();

I seem to recall the Effect.Appear setting the final opacity to 0.99 to avoid some bug on some browser; anyone remember the specifics? Seems like we should probably just conditionally check for the broken browser and set to 0.99 for only that one, otherwise leave it at 1.0, but I know I don''t have the full picture of why it was necessary or whether it still is. Greg

var height = someElementReference.offsetHeight; and to set it: someElementReference.style.height = "100"; It is worth saying that offsetHeight and offsetWidth are non-standard compliance. They will give you the total rendering height and this will cause problems in IE since they use a different box model than FireFox. So you will have to do some height juggling in IE if you are using