similar to: problem with get command [Broadcast]

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "problem with get command [Broadcast]"

2016 Sep 01
3
[RFC] Interprocedural MIR-level outlining pass
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin.org> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Andrey Bokhanko" <andreybokhanko at gmail.com>, "llvm-dev" > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 7:02:57 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Interprocedural
2016 Sep 01
2
[RFC] Interprocedural MIR-level outlining pass
Hi Daniel, Consider me convinced (not sure you care, but still... :-)) What confused me is that this is not VN in a traditional sense -- it's more like using VN's infrastructure to compute something different. But one can use VN's code for this, indeed. Thank you for the explanation! Yours, Andrey On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
2003 Feb 04
2
testing slope
Hi all, I try to test a linear slope using offset. I have: > m2 <- glm(Y~X*V) > summary(m2) Call: glm(formula = Y ~ X * V) Deviance Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -2.01688 -0.56028 0.05224 0.53213 3.60216 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 1.3673 0.8476 1.613 0.119788 X
2006 May 03
2
Outreg-like command?
It would be nice to have something like stata's outreg that lets regression output go into a form like Specification (1) Specification (2) Var 1 coef(1,1) coef(1,2) se(1,1) se(1,2) Var 2 coef(2,1) coef(2,2) se(2,1) se(2,2) I don't think this can be done in xtable? Thomas Davidoff Assistant Professor Haas School of Business UC Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94618 Phone: (510)
2016 Aug 31
2
[RFC] Interprocedural MIR-level outlining pass
> > > Yes, this was exactly my point. We want to recognize > structurally-equivalent sequences of instructions on inequivalent operands. > Yes, and my point is "none of the vn and vn-dag generating algorithms care". you can define equivalent to be "structural", you can define it to be "these two variables are equivalent if they both start with
2005 Jun 25
1
group means: split and unsplit
Took me a while but I figured out how to put in common values of group means/counts, etc. to do the same thing as egen. lapply with split and then unsplit. Thomas Davidoff Assistant Professor Haas School of Business UC Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 phone: (510) 643-1425 fax: (510) 643-7357 davidoff@haas.berkeley.edu http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/davidoff [[alternative HTML
2005 May 31
1
Tiger problems
I get the following when I try to run R from the terminal (I think ok from the gui, but not what I want to do): dyld: Symbol not found: __cg_jpeg_resync_to_restart Referenced from: /System/Library/Frameworks/ ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/ImageIO.framework/ Versions/A/ImageIO Expected in: /sw/lib/libJPEG.dylib Trace/BPT trap Any suggestions? I have installed the
2005 Jul 21
1
Clustered standard errors in a panel
I want to do the following: glm(y ~ x1 + x2 +...) within a panel. Hence y, x1, and x2 all vary at the individual level. However, there is likely correlation of these variables within an individual, so standard errors need adjustment. I do not want to estimate fixed effects, but do want to cluster standard errors at the individual level. Is there an automated way to do this? Nothing in
2005 Jun 25
2
r equivalent of egen? Not tapply
I have a list that has about 50 elements, each repeated many times (a list of states by observation). I want to create a vector with the same length with the same value repeated over and over again within states. The value I want is the number of observations that are in the same state as each observation. In stata, this is simply egen statesum = count(state), by(state). What is the r
2009 Jan 15
2
Digium TE220 supported protocol
Hi, Our potentiel next phone provider ask me a question i can't answer for sure, maybe someone here knows ? He says that is equipement only support VN4 protocol or more, or ETSI, however i can't find matching terms in the digium documentation or the chan_dahdi/dahdi/system.conf files... Any idea ? regards
2007 Mar 13
1
French PRI channel - exact signaling used
hello, We encountered signaling problem with a french national carrier. They ask us, which signaling is configured on our single E1. I need to know if it's ETSI, VN4 or VN6. I know what ccs, and hdb3 mean but I do not succeed to make the link between the signaling type. I searched through RFC Q.921 and Q.931 It would be great to obtain some help. cedric
2013 Oct 15
0
Antw: Xen-users Digest, Vol 104, Issue 18
Op 10/12/13, xen-users-request@lists.xen.org schreef: > Send Xen-users mailing list submissions to > xen-users@lists.xen.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to > xen-users-request@lists.xen.org > > You
2013 Jul 03
0
UPS has no built-in monitor. [GishPuppy]
Hi, Reference: lists.vn1 at gishpuppy.com wrote: > OS: Debian Wheezy > Nut: 2.6.4-2.3 > Installation method: Synaptic > Device: CDP B-UPR505 > Traces, debugs, etc.: Not available or irrelevant > > Description: > > Where I currently live (Honduras), buying a UPS with monitoring capability means spending at least twice as much as a "plain-Jane" model - usually
2013 Jul 03
2
UPS has no built-in monitor. [GishPuppy]
OS: Debian Wheezy Nut: 2.6.4-2.3 Installation method: Synaptic Device: CDP B-UPR505 Traces, debugs, etc.: Not available or irrelevant Description: Where I currently live (Honduras), buying a UPS with monitoring capability means spending at least twice as much as a "plain-Jane" model - usually even more than that. Thus, since I can't afford the ones with monitoring, all I have are
2019 Jul 02
0
[ANNOUNCE] libdrm 2.4.99
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Adrian Salido (1): libdrm: reduce number of reallocations in drmModeAtomicAddProperty Chunming Zhou (9): add cs chunk for syncobj timeline add timeline wait/query ioctl v2 wrap syncobj timeline query/wait APIs for amdgpu v3 add timeline signal/transfer ioctls v2 expose timeline signal/export/import interfaces v2
2018 Jul 24
0
oddity in transform
I don't think it has much to do with transform in particular: > BOD <- data.frame(Time = 1:6, demand = runif(6)) > BOD[["X"]] <- BOD[1:2] * seq(6); BOD Time demand X.Time X.demand 1 1 0.8649628 1 0.8649628 2 2 0.5895380 4 1.1790761 3 3 0.6854635 9 2.0563906 4 4 0.4255801 16 1.7023206 5 5 0.5738793 25 2.8693967 6 6 0.9996713
2018 Jul 24
0
oddity in transform
I think you meant to call BOD[,1] From ?transform, the ... arguments are supposed to be vectors, and BOD[1] is still a data.frame (with one column). So I don't think it's surprising transform gets confused by which name to use (X, or Time?), and kind of compromises on the name "Time". It's also in a note in ?transform: "If some of the values are not vectors of the
2018 Jul 24
2
oddity in transform
The idea is that one wants to write the line of code below in a general way which works the same whether you specify ix as one column or multiple columns but the naming entirely changes when you do this and BOD[, 1] and transform(BOD, X=..., Y=...) or other hard coding solutions still require writing multiple cases. ix <- 1:2 transform(BOD, X = BOD[ix] * seq(6)) On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at
2006 Oct 25
1
sourcing dput output
Is this not supposed to work? > dput(BOD, file = "/BOD.R") > source("/BOD.R") Error in attributes(.Data) <- c(attributes(.Data), attrib) : row names must be 'character' or 'integer', not 'double' > dput(iris, file = "/iris.R") > source("/iris.R") Error in attributes(.Data) <- c(attributes(.Data), attrib) :
1997 Dec 19
1
R-beta: a bug in the lm function ?
I ran a function called BoxCox, taken from the book by Venables and Ripley, for checking the need for power transformation. This function works fine using the version 0.50 of R, but gives an error message with version 0.60. The lm function in version 0.60 is different from that in version 0.50. Is there a bug in the new lm function? Kung-Sik Chan >