similar to: lwd - Windows

If I want to plot different widths of line segments or arrows I have to program loops to plot each line apartly. Is that right? n <- 6 x <- 1:n y <- rnorm(1:n) q <- ( x %% 3 + 1 ) * 2 plot( x, y, cex=q ) for( i in 1:(n-1) ) lines( x[i:(i+1)], y[i:(i+1)], lwd=q[i], col=q[i] ) Would it not be possible to make plotting functions accept vectors of line widths (as they

[[yet another discussion brought from R-core to R-devel]] >>>>> "RG" == Robert Gentleman <rgentlem@stat.auckland.ac.nz> writes: RG> Peter, there is some code for line types and widths in all the RG> drivers. With windows there is the well known limitation that you RG> can't have patterened lines with lwd larger than 1 (unless you

Hello dear members of R-help and R-core mailing list, I am not sure if this request is a "ticket" that should be filled somewhere outside the mailing list. If so, I apologize for not doing and would like to know where I should have filled it. And to the subject matter: I would like to use a command like this: plot(c(1,8), 1:2, type="n") polygon(1:7, c(2,1,2,NA,2,1,2),

Hello dear members of R-help and R-core mailing list, I am not sure if this request is a "ticket" that should be filled somewhere outside the mailing list. If so, I apologize for not doing and would like to know where I should have filled it. And to the subject matter: I would like to use a command like this: plot(c(1,8), 1:2, type="n") polygon(1:7, c(2,1,2,NA,2,1,2),

Hi, I'm working on some lattice wireframe figures that have two conditioning factors, and I want the strips labelled on the top and left of the entire plot, rather than above each individual panel. useOuterStrips() does this, but it draws internal axis lines, even after I explicitly set axis.line to 0. Is there a way to use useOuterStrips but without axis boxes? I've included a short

Hi, I would like to recommend a minor modification in axis() which I believe can simplify the making of plots for publications. I am trying to define default values for par() in order to make labels bigger and lines thicker, so that the resulting plots look good when resized for publication purposes. I ran into the following problem... axis() does not use par() values as default for

I found it useful to have contour be able to do line widths ... hope that the guts haven't changed an enormous amount in the current development version ... the patches are relatively trivial, mostly going by analogy with lty and col (although in my ignorance it took me a while to figure out what UNPROTECT(2) was and why it should be changed to UNPROTECT(3) ... hope this is useful. Ben

Hi, To plot a figure, I used lwd=0.18 in the function lines() to plot very fine lines. However, using png() or pdf() to save the figure, it appears that lwd has no effect on pdf() beyond some small number (e.g. 0.18) and the lines looks much thicker than png(). Setting lwd<0.18 does not make the lines any finer in pdf(). I also tried specifying the argument lwd in par() instead and still faced

hi I'm using the GDD package (in a 64bits fedora machine using R 2.3.0) to save in a png file some plots and i noticed that changing the lwd parameter does not change my line width I tried the same script in a Windows based R (2.2.1 r36812), using no GDD, and it worked. Does anybody has a clue? My testing script is something dumb like this: library(GDD) GDD("pres24.png",

Full_Name: Tom Short Version: 1.9.1 OS: Win2000 & Debian Submission from: (NULL) (64.65.255.41) WISHLIST: axis() has a default parameter of "lwd = 1". I want skinnier lines as the default. If I change the default lty, it doesn't change what axis uses. The following code produces a graph with a box around it, but the axis lines are twice as thick as the box around the plot, so

Dear List, Sorry, this is very simple but I can't seem to find any information regarding line widths of plotting symbols in the lattice package. For instance, in traditional graphics: > plot(1:10,lwd=3) > points(10:1,lwd=2,col=3) 'lwd' allows control of plotting symbol line widths. I've tried looking through the documentation for xyplot, panel.points, trellis.par.set,

Dear R-help, Has anyone notice the problem that, on Windows (NT and XP), when printing a graph using the "File -> Print..." menu in the graphics window to print the graph, that line width seemed to be ignored in the printed output? For example, if I make a plot with plot(1:10, type="l", lwd=5), it looks right on screen, but when printed out using the menu, it looks like

Lfo@psykiatri.aaa.dk wrote: > (R1.9.1 Windows) > > In legend( ) lwd have no effect on points - contrary to the behaviour > in e.g. plot( ) and points( ). It would be nice to have an option pt.lwd > affecting the line width of legend points (like pt.cex changes the > magnification). > > > An example (note the difference in line width between points in the > plot

Hi all. I'm working with a short plot (3x3 inches), but the results (via postscript command) are not nice. The lwd command don't affect the lines (that are very large) and the margins don't change using oma, mai, mar, ... Below I put an example. Moreover, save the graphics via postscript command isn't working well (see the attached ps). Thanks by the help, Cezar Freitas.

Using a line width > 1 results in not only a thicker line but also some fuzz in the other direction, as shown in this example program. You will see that the thick vertical black lines extend below the gray scale horizontal lines. Does anyone know whether this is intended or is it a bug? The application is for displaying a correlation matrix (here just some random U(0,1)s). Thanks -Frank

Hi! (a complete newby, but will not give up easily!) I was wondering if there is any way to decouple the axis and tick mark widths? As I understand they are both controlled by the lwd setting, and cannot be controlled independently? For example I might want to create major and minor ticks, which I now know how to do by superimposing two axes with different at settings, but what if I also wanted

Is this an interface bug? Using RGUI for windows I run into a "Not Responding" process (I "smartly" coded an infinite loop, yaiks!), I hit esc and the interpreter was stopped and I recovered the console functionality but the caption on the R icon in my windows taskbar (the individual icon shown for every software currently running in the session) was not updated so the

i've search the email archives, searched the documention of various map packages and done an R-site search, but have been unable to find direct resources for creating maps of the US that are colored or annotated or ... by zipcode data. For example, create a map of the US and color each zipcode region by its population using two vectors z,p containing the zipcode and population,

Hello R Developers, Dear R-developers, I ran some standard tests with currently (today morning) compiled R release candidate in Linux R 2.12.1 RC (2010-12-13 r53843). Some of these tests used plot.TukeyHSD function. This worked OK on the screen (X11 device), but PostScript file could not be rendered. The following example had the problem with me: postscript(file="tukeyplot.ps")

Hello, if I plot a horizontal line, e.g., plot(c(1,2),c(1,1),xlim=c(0,3),lwd=2,type="l") or plot(c(1,2),c(1,1),xlim=c(0,3),lwd=4,type="l") then the left end (1st example) or both ends (2nd example) of the lines are not rectangular but slanted on the graphical display (screen). That behavour first occurred when I was trying to plot a stepfun, e.g., y <-