similar to: Breakdown a number [Broadcast]

What a delicious example! (I'm taking the liberty of sharing it with r-devel, since it raises some good issues.) You have two questions, presumably: 1 - how could the order of the setMethod calls make a difference in the results? 2 - what's causing the infinite loop & how could it be avoided, reliably? Second question first. The danger sign is the "vector" method:

At this point I would just due: formals(body(method)[[2L]]) At some point we need to figure out what to do with this .local() confusion. On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Roebuck,Paul L <PLRoebuck at mdanderson.org> wrote: > I'm attempting to reflect the information for use with corresponding > fields in GUI (in a different package), to provide default values, > argname

On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 18:12, Simon Urbanek wrote: > On Feb 6, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Paul Roebuck wrote: > >> Tried on R-Sig-Mac with no responses, but I need some kind >> of answer. >> [...] >> Does the following work on your system? > > Interesting, no, it doesn't either. For png and pdf I use > Quartz + quartz.save (it produces much nicer results) so > I

I'm attempting to reflect the information for use with corresponding fields in GUI (in a different package), to provide default values, argname as key for UI label lookups, etc. So I want something much more like the formals of the implementation: { "object", "method": c("median", "vs", "tukey"),

On Jan 28, 2015, at 6:37 PM, Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> wrote: > At this point I would just due: > > formals(body(method)[[2L]]) > > At some point we need to figure out what to do with this .local() confusion. Agreed, definitely. The current hack is to avoid re-matching arguments on method dispatch, so a fix would need to be fairly deep in the

Can the value of a list element be referenced from a sibling list element during list creation without the use of a temporary variable? The following doesn't work but it's the general idea. > list(value = 2, plusplus = $value+1) such that the following would be the output from str() List of 2 $ value : num 2 $ plusplus: num 3

How would one go about getting sprintf to use the values of a vector without having to specify each argument individually? > v <- c(1, 2, -1.197114, 0.1596687) > iv <- c(3, 1, 2, 4) > sprintf("%9.2f\t%d\t%d\t%8.3f", v[3], v[1], v[2], v[4]) [1] " -1.20\t1\t2\t 0.160" Essentially, desired effect would be something like: >

What's the best way to simulate Recall for parent function? Consider this one-time recursive code: alwaysEven <- function(x) { handleOdd <- function(x) { alwaysEven(x-1) # use Recall-like here } return(if (x %% 2) handleOdd(x) else x) } any2even <- alwaysEven rm(alwaysEven) any2even(3) ---------------------------------------------------------- SIGSIG --

Was looking at what was output for <pkgname>-package.Rd and wondered if any there was any means (via macro, etc) to merge some of the same information with a template for my package manpage? As much (all?) of the generated information was already provided in the DESCRIPTION, I'd prefer not to have to update the information in multiple places. I'm thinking here that I could provide a

I have the following: > a <- matrix(1:10, nrow = 2, byrow = TRUE) > b <- array(as.integer(0), c(7, 5)) > idx <- list() > length(idx) <- 2 > dim(idx) <- c(1, 2) > idx[[1]] <- as.integer(1:2) > idx[[2]] <- as.integer(1:5) I can do the following, which works if 'b' is a matrix. > b[idx[[1]], idx[[2]]] <- a > b [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]

I have some code where the primary dispatching is on other parameters so I'd like not to have to create a set of functions for "matrix" and another duplicate set for "array". But the class union technique isn't working as implemented below and I don't have my Green book with me. How do I fix my infinite recursion problem?

Would you please clarify your exact use case? Thanks, Michael On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Roebuck,Paul L <PLRoebuck at mdanderson.org> wrote: > Interrogating some (of my own) code in another package. > > >norm.meth <- getMethod("normalize", "MatrixLike") > >message("str(norm.meth)") > >str(norm.meth) > >

What would be nice is to have something like a "robust" task view... Andy From: Berton Gunter > > Many thanks for this Martin. There now are several packages > with what appear to be overlapping functions (or at least > algorithms). Besides those you mentioned, "robust" and > "roblm" are at least two others. Any recommendations about > how or

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Simon Urbanek wrote: > On Jun 17, 2006, at 8:02 AM, Paul Roebuck wrote: > > > Is there a means to provide a title for a Quartz window? > > Yes, now introduced in 3244: you can specify the desired name in the > call to quartz, e.g. > quartz("My Precious Plot") > We have never used the device name, so now we have at least some use >

Paul Roebuck wrote: >I have the following contrived code in package format. >On Solaris and Mac OS X, code runs just fine. On Windows, >it crashes the R environment with the "Send Bug Report" >dialog. I tried R 1.8.1 (Win2K) and R 1.9 (WinXP) binaries >with the same result. PCs otherwise appear properly >configured for creating R packages. Anything blatantly >wrong?

Hi, We have recently started using the director in some tests. We are using the static passdb setup (proxy=y nopassword=y) for now, where authentication is done on the downstream IMAP servers. "dovecot director status" shows a breakdown of proxied connections per backend, but there does not seem to be a similar breakdown of user connections per director. The output of

I recently encountered this and was wondering if someone could explain what happened. Basis of question involves what the difference between the calls makes as the end result is the same: > identical(matrix(1:8, nrow = 1), array(1:8, c(1, 8))) TRUE If I run the code below as shown, I get the following: > foo(1:8, 4) foo (vector, numeric) val = 4 foo (matrix, ANY) val = 500 foo

Hi, as now i am doing profiling and found that the QEMU should be one of the major reason for the low network throughput on HVM Guest. In order to know details about it, it will be better to get the breakdown of QEMU in Oprofile. As see from the following results,there is only two breakdowns, how can I run the oprofile to get more detailed QEMU informations? 29933 12.5726 qemu-dm

Under Details section for as.Date: as.Date will accept numeric data (the number of days since an epoch), but only is origin is supplied. ^^ should be "if" R version 2.7.0 Patched (2008-06-04 r45830) ---------------------------------------------------------- SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)

Hi, I am trying to understand how the biplot.prcomp is constructed so I can manipulate it to emphasise particular observations and reduce the number of variables shown. The prcomp model I have ran has cor=TRUE and scale=TRUE I have worked out from looking at str(prcomp.model) that... prcomp.model$x = the observations ploted in the biplot prcomp.model$rotation = the variables that form the