similar to: pros and cons of "robust regression"? (i.e. rlm vs lm)

Hi List, Just wondering where the documentation exists for the statistics which makeup the bwplot. I'm guessing that if R is like similar products that the graph is constructed as The median is the filled circle. The box surrounding the filled circle depicts the 25th and 75th quartile. The range of values is given by the dotted lines (?whiskers?) outside of each box, and possible

Hi, trying to do a robudt regression of a two-way linear model, I keep getting the following error: > lqs(obs ~ y + s -1,method="lms", contrasts=list(s=("contr.sum"))) Error: lqs failed: all the samples were singular Robust regression with M-estimators works (also regular least square fits, of course): rlm.formula(formula = obs ~ y + s - 1, method = "M",

Hi, I would appreciate of someone could explain how the residual standard error is computed for rlm models (MASS package). Usually, one would expect to get the residual standard error by > sqrt(sum((y-fitted(fm))^2)/(n-2)) where y is the response, fm a linear model with an intercept and slope for x and n the number of observations. This does not seem to work for rlm models and I am wondering

Hello, I'm learning about robust M-estimators right now and had settled on the "Huber Proposal 2" as implemented in MASS, but further reading made clear, that at least 2 further weighting functions (Hampel, Tukey bisquare) exist. In a post from B.D. Ripley going back to 1999 I found the following quote: >> 2) Would huber() give me results that are similar (i.e., close

I am a new user of R so please bear with me. I have reviewed some R books, FAQs and such but the volume of material is great. I am in the process of porting my current SAS and SVS Script code to Lotus Approach, R and WordPerfect. My question is, can you help me determine the best R method to implement the Hoaglin Outlier Method? It is used in the Appendix A and B of the fo llowing link.

What would be nice is to have something like a "robust" task view... Andy From: Berton Gunter > > Many thanks for this Martin. There now are several packages > with what appear to be overlapping functions (or at least > algorithms). Besides those you mentioned, "robust" and > "roblm" are at least two others. Any recommendations about > how or

>>>>> Serguei Sokol <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >>>>> on Tue, 30 May 2017 16:01:17 +0200 writes: > Le 30/05/2017 ? 09:33, Martin Maechler a ?crit : ... >> However, even after the patch, The example from the SO >> post differs from the result of Richie Cotton's >> function... > The explanation is quite simple.

>>>>> Serguei Sokol <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >>>>> on Mon, 29 May 2017 15:28:12 +0200 writes: > Sorry, I have seen it too late that we had different tab > width in the original file and my editor. Here is the > patch with all white spaces instead of mixing tabs and > white spaces. thank you - it still gives quite a few

What I'm trying to do is create best fit line in R for a set of data points and then remove all the outliers to re-create a best fit. I can't use IQR because the outliers I have in mind are easily within the range, but way out of line for the best fit, which is ruining the fit. I'd rather throw out those points all together. Thanks! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

R 2.0.1 Linux I am using rlm() to fit a model, e.g. fit1<-rlm(y~x). My model is more complex than the one shown. When I enter summary(fit1) I get estimates for the model's coefficients along with their SEs, and t values, but no p values. The p value column is blank. Similarly, when I enter anova(fit1) I get DF, Sum Sq, Mean Sq, but the column for F value and Pr(>F) are blank. Any

Hi, I am trying to build a series of rlm models. I have my data frame and the models will be built using various coulmns of the data frame. Thus a series of models would be m1 <- rlm(V1 ~ V2 + V3 + V4, data) m2 <- rlm(V1 ~ V2 + V5 + V7, data) m3 <- rlm(V1 ~ V2 + V8 + V9, data) I would like to automate this. Is it possible to use a string in place of the formula? I tried doing: fmla

Dear Group, I am having trouble with using rlm on multivariate data sets. When I call rlm I get Error in lm.wfit(x, y, w, method = "qr") : incompatible dimensions lm on the same data sets seem to work well (see code example). Am I doing something wrong? I have already browsed through the forums and google but could not find any related discussions. I use Windows XP and R

Hello, I have a simple xyplot with rlm lines. I would like to add the a and b coefficients (y=ax+b) of the rlm calculation in each panel. I know I can do it 'outside' the xyplot command but I would like to do all at the same time. I found some posts with the same question, but no answer. Is it impossible ? Thanks in advance for your help. Ptit Bleu. x11(15,12) xyplot(df1$col2 ~

Hello all, I'm using R2.7.0 (on Windows 2000) and I'm trying do run a robust regression on following model structure: model = "Y ~ x1*x2 / (x3 + x4 + x5 +x6)" where x1 and x2 are both factors (either 1 or 0) and x3.....x6 are numeric. The error code I get when running rlm(as.formula(model), data=daymean) is: error in rlm.default(x, y, weights, method = method, wt.method =

I keep coming back to this problem of singular fits in rlm (MASS library), but cannot figure out a good solution. I am fitting a linear model with a factor variable, like lm( Y ~ factorVar) and this works fine. lm knows to construct the contrast matrix the way I would expect, which puts the first factor as the baseline level. But when I try rlm( Y ~ factorVar) I get the message "'x'

How do I add to a trellis plot the best fit line from a robust fit? I can use panel.lm to add a least squares fit, but there is no panel.rlm function. -- Alan S Barnett <asb at mail.nih.gov> NIMH/CBDB

Dear R-devel, There seems to be a discrepancy in the order in which lm and rlm evaluate their arguments. This causes rlm to sometimes produce an error where lm is just fine. Here is a little script that illustrate the issue: > library(MASS) > ## create data > n <- 100 > dat <- data.frame(x=rep(c(-1,0,1), n), y=rnorm(3*n)) > > ## call lm, works fine > summary(lm(y ~

Hi all, I have probably a basic question, but I can't seem to find the answer in the literature or in the R-archives. I would like to do a robust ANCOVA (using either rlm or lmRob of the MASS and robust packages) - my response variable deviates slightly from normal and I have some "outliers". The data consist of 2 factor variables and 3-5 covariates (fdepending on the model).

Hi all, I am reading the MASS book but it doesn't give examples about the diagnosis and model checking for rlm... My data is highly non-Gaussian so I am using rlm instead of lm. My questions are: 0. Are goodness-of-fit and model-checking using rlm completely the same as usual regression? 1. Please give me some pointers about how to do goodness-of-fit and residual diagnosis for

Hi all, I am also confused about the manual: a. The input arguments: wt.method are the weights case weights (giving the relative importance of case, so a weight of 2 means there are two of these) or the inverse of the variances, so a weight of two means this error is half as variable? w (optional) initial down-weighting for each case. init (optional) initial values for the