similar to: generating LaTeX tables from Match output

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "generating LaTeX tables from Match output"

2005 Jun 24
1
lme4 extracting individual variance components
Hi, For further calculations I need to extract indivdual Variances of different random effects from a fitted model. I found out how to extract the correlations (VarCorr(m1)@reSumry$group1) but I was not able to find a way to extract the other components individually. To extract the Residuals I tried: (ranef(m1)@ stdErr) which unfortunately did not work. Thank you very much for your help!
2012 Feb 13
2
Error in apply(x2, 1, diff) : dim(X) must have a positive length
Anyone knows hat might be the cause of this error? Thanks for any help! >library(MASS) > dif.mns = function(x2,tr1=.2,tr2=.3){ + #generates four different 'means' using + #difference scores from x2, an n x 2 matrix + #for use w/ bootstrap comparisons + diffs = apply(x2,1,diff) + mn1=mean(diffs) + mn2=mean(diffs,tr=.2) + mn3=mean(diffs,tr=.3) +
2014 May 08
3
[LLVMdev] Small problem with the tail call elimination pass
Hello everybody, On the documentation page for the tailcallelim pass you can read: "This pass transforms functions that are prevented from being tail recursive by an associative expression to use an accumulator variable, thus compiling the typical naive factorial or fib implementation into efficient code” However, I don’t see this behavior when trying to compile this variant of the
2004 Jul 06
1
questions about setMethod("Arith", ...)
Hi, we have some questions concerning the definition of new arithmetic methods. In our package "distr" (on CRAN) we define some new arithmetic methods for "+", "-", "*", "/". After loading "distr" the corresponding arithmetic methods work. Now, if we define a new class and also a new method for one of the arithmetic methods
2001 Mar 10
3
Problem With Model.Tables Function
I am using R for the first time in one of my classes. My students have alerted me to a problem for which we have not found an answer. We find that some means returned by the model.tables function are not correct when missing data is present in analysis of variance problems. We have duplicated the problem using R 1.2.0, 1.2.1, and 1.2.2 under Windows 98 and several distributions of Linux (Redhat
2007 Aug 06
1
data analysis
Dear all, I have a factorial design where the response is an ordered categorical response. treatment (two levels: 1 and 2) time (four levels: 30, 60,90 and 120) ordered response (0,1,2,3) could someone suggest a correct analysis or some references? Best regards subject treatment time response 1 1 30 3 2 1 30 3 3 1 30 1 4 1 30
2006 Apr 05
2
using latex() in R for Unix
I am using R for Unix and want to make some LaTeX tables. I have already played around in R for Windows and have succeeded in making tables that I want using the following code: latex(Estimates, file='out.tex', rowlabel='',digits=3) However, when I use this code in Unix, I can never find the file "out.tex". I assumed that R would send the file to whatever directory I
2004 Jun 26
1
S4 group "Math", "getGroupMembers", "genericForPrimitive"
Hi, I found the following on Windows 2000/NT R Version 1.9.1 (2004-06-21) (also Version 1.9.0): The S4 group "Math" doesn't work as documented; i.e., "log", "log10", "gamma" and "lgamma" are included in the documentation but don't work. See example code below. Moreover, what about 'genericForPrimitive' which is used in
2001 Feb 19
1
means by column after split
Colleagues ---------------------------------- System info: R version rw1020 on NT ESS using emacs ver. 20.4 ---------------------------------- I need to get the means for each column of a dataframe in the list created by splitting a data frame. At present, I am getting the mean of all columns in aggregate. The structure of the unsplit data is: > shuttle.tr1[1:10,] juliandate
2011 Oct 01
2
Entering data into a multi-way array?
Hello: I am a novice R user, but I have been working my way through the manuals / tutorials, ... I have R / Deducer up and running, and know the basics. I want to analyze a microarray (gene expression) dataset. I need to input the data into R as a multidimensional (multi-way) array, something on the order of 15,000 x 3 x 8 x 2 [genes x replicates x time points x treatments] I've
2006 Apr 13
1
number of matches when using Match()
To anyone who uses the Match() function in the Matching library... How do you go about deciding how many matches you will use? With my data, my standard errors generally get smaller if I use more matches. Speaking of standard errors, when correcting for heteroscedasticity, how many matches do you use (this is the Var.cal option). It seems to me that it might make sense to use the same number
2018 Mar 15
2
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:09 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > +Chandler who might have some thoughts on this. > > Could you provide an example here of the motivation for the feature you're > missing? Might help motivate the discussion (and/or we'll end up nitpicking > how it could be done differently without that feature... - which
2018 Mar 16
0
[RFC] Updating googletest to non-release tagged version
Thanks. The motivating example can be seen in this review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44382. In that review, I am unit testing .debug_line parsing, specifically, the behaviour when the parser is fed a malformed section. Most of the code under test goes through some slight variations in the code path, depending on a) the DWARF version (interesting cases are 3, 4 and 5), and b) whether the DWARF is
2007 Jul 04
1
[LLVMdev] Boost Support
I've been doing some experiments with the Boost Graph Library (BGL) and interfacing to llvm's GraphWriter system. I'm using GBL for some custom work and needed a way to hook BGL's write_graphviz into GraphWriter to use the existing display infrastructure. To do this I added a HAVE_BOOST configure item and #ifdef'd the Boost support code in GraphWriter. Is this useful to
2006 Jan 06
1
lmer p-vales are sometimes too small
This concerns whether p-values from lmer can be trusted. From simulations, it seems that lmer can produce very small, and probably spurious, p-values. I realize that lmer is not yet a finished product. Is it likely that the problem will be fixed in a future release of the lme4 package? Using simulated data for a quite standard mixed-model anova (a balanced two-way design; see code for the
2004 Jun 02
3
S4 classes?
The following example, extracted from pp. 38-42 of Chambers (1998) Programming with Data (Springer), works for me in S-Plus 6.2 but not R 1.9.0pat, which returns the indicated error messages: > setClass('track', representation(x="numeric", y="numeric")) [1] "track" > tr1 <- new("track", x=1:3, y=4:6) > setMethod("plot", +
2006 Jan 27
2
Spa3k and ISDN
Hello all, I have an ISDN termination box (TR1) that converts ISDN(Bri) to 2 normal analogue lines. The same number is assigned to these lines. These lines are connected to 2 spa3k registered to my asterisk box. When calls arrive, TR1 try to pass call to the first spa. If spa not takes the call immediately then try to pass to the other spa. The only configuration I found works is to put the
2014 Mar 30
2
CXX_STD and configure.ac in packages
In C++ code for use in a R-3.1.0 package, my specific problem is that I would like to use <unordered_map> if it is available, or <tr1/unordered_map> if not, or <map> if all else fails. I (think I) can accomplish this with configure.ac as AC_INIT("DESCRIPTION") CXX=`"${R_HOME}/bin/R" CMD config CXX` CXXFLAGS=`"${R_HOME}/bin/R" CMD config
2006 Oct 26
1
A faster way to calculate Trace?
I want to know how to get trace of product of matrices **faster** when the matrices are really big. Unfortunately the matrices are not symmetric. If anybody know how to get the trace of it, please help me. An example is as below. n <- 2500 a <- matrix(rnorm(n*n),n,n) b <- matrix(rnorm(n*n),n,n) tr1 <- sum(diag(a %*% b)) tr2 <- sum(diag(a %*% b %*% a %*% b)) Thanks, Yongwan Chun
2008 May 20
1
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL
On Sunday 18 May 2008 09:02, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > As for the 340, for an highly replaceable library comprising 1% of our > LOC to bloat the source file count in our tree by 20%—after using a > script to extract a perfect transitive dependency closure—well, I was > on the verge of tossing it overboard. I can't blame Chris for his > reticence to add such nonsense to LLVM, as