similar to: Using LAPACK in C-code to be loaded in R - getting-started-help

man for `qr` says that the function uses LINPACK's DQRDC, while it in fact uses DQRDC2. ``` The QR decomposition of the matrix as computed by LINPACK or LAPACK. The components in the returned value correspond directly to the values returned by DQRDC/DGEQP3/ZGEQP3 ```

Hi all, I am wondering if anyone has problem installing 'knncat' package. I tried to install using 'Rcmd INSTALL knncat_1.1.1.tar.gz', error message appeared. I attached the message in the end. I allso tried to install from RGui, but it was not listed. Thanks in advance. Regards, jenny ---------- Making package knncat ------------ adding build stamp to DESCRIPTION

Hi All: Package TSERIES is stated to depend on MVA. However, there is no MVA package to be found under the list of package sources. Best wishes, ANDREW tseries: Package for time series analysis Package for time series analysis with emphasis on non-linear and non-stationary modelling Version: 0.7-6 Depends: ts, mva, quadprog Date: 2001-08-27 Author: Compiled by Adrian

Hello. I am trying to invert a matrix, and I am finding that I can get different answers depending on whether I set LAPACK true or false using "qr". I had understood that LAPACK is, in general more robust and faster than LINPACK, so I am confused as to why I am getting what seems to be invalid answers. The matrix is ostensibly the Hessian for a function I am optimizing. I want to get

In my package 'glmmML' I'm using old C code and linpack in the optimizing procedure. Specifically, one part of the code looks like this: F77_CALL(dpoco)(*hessian, &bdim, &bdim, &rcond, work, info); if (*info == 0){ F77_CALL(dpodi)(*hessian, &bdim, &bdim, det, &job); ........ This usually works OK, but with an ill-conditioned data

Hi, I understand that the glm.fit calls LINPACK fortran routines instead of LAPACK because it can handle the 'rank deficiency problem'. If my data matrix is not rank deficient, would a glm.fit function which runs on LAPACK be faster? Would this be worthwhile to convert glm.fit to use LAPACK? Has anyone done this already?? What is the best way to do this? I'm looking at very

The following snippet suggests that there is either a bug in qr(,LAPACK=T), or some bug in my understanding. Note that the detected rank is correct (= 2) using the default LINPACK qr, but incorrect (=3) using LAPACK. This is running on Linux Redhat 9.0, using the lapack library that comes with the Redhat distribution. I'm running R 1.7.1 compiled from the source. If the bug is in my

Hi All Please see the Rprofile file which i have modified as follows and after that when I start R then I see that R says to me "TRUE" for all the packages implying that all loaded at once. But when i try to use commands as simple as help("lm"), it doesnt work nor any of the menu "Packages" is not working. Although the regression using lm ( Y ~ X ) is working

> > On 9 Feb 2017, at 16:00, G?ran Brostr?m <goran.brostrom at umu.se> wrote: > > > > In my package 'glmmML' I'm using old C code and linpack in the optimizing procedure. Specifically, one part of the code looks like this: > > > > F77_CALL(dpoco)(*hessian, &bdim, &bdim, &rcond, work, info); > > if (*info == 0){ > >

I use knncat to make a predictive model and get misclass rate > knncat.m<-knncat(training.new,k=c(10,20),classcol=5) > knncat.m Training set misclass rate: 36.88% then I try to calculate prediction accuracy by the following: > pr.knncat.train <- predict (knncat.m,training.new,training.new,train.classcol=5,newdata.classcol=5) > tb.knncat.train <-table (pr.knncat.train,

Hi all, I downloaded a R package (supclust, not from CRAN) in my directory, then type: markov:/home/pingzhao> R CMD INSTALL supclust_1.1.tar.gz -l ~/lib but met the following errors * Installing *source* package 'supclust' ... ** libs /usr/local/lib/R/bin/SHLIB: make: not found ERROR: compilation failed for package 'supclust' Does it mean the R has not properly installed?

Full_Name: Ravi Varadhan Version: 2.8.1 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (162.129.251.19) Inverting a matrix with solve(), but using LAPACK=TRUE, gives erroneous results: Here is an example: hilbert <- function(n) { i <- 1:n; 1 / outer(i - 1, i, "+") } h5 <- hilbert(5) hinv1 <- solve(qr(h5)) hinv2 <- solve(qr(h5, LAPACK=TRUE)) all.equal(hinv1, hinv2) #

I am a relative newcomer to both the R and C/C++ software worlds -- I'm taking a C Programming class currently. I noticed the other day that the C:\Program Files\R1_8_1\src\include\R_ext directory on my WinXP box has the header files BLAS.h Lapack.h Linpack.h RLapack.h I am interested in (perhaps) using one or more of these header files in a straight C program I'm working on in Visual

r-devel list, I have recently written an R package that solves a linear least squares problem, and computes the multivariate normal density function. The bulk of the code is written in C, with interfacing code to the BLAS and Lapack libraries. The motivation here is speed. I ran into a problem computing the determinant of a symmetric matrix in packed storage. Apparently, there are no explicit

Hi there, How to solve the conflicts as to the same object between two packages, for example, like margins in both randomForest and supclust? When both libraries are installed, supclust will complain "margins" defined in randomForest. I can only solve it by re-starting R, which is very inconvenient, any clever way? Thanks, Weiwei -- Weiwei Shi, Ph.D Research Scientist GeneGO, Inc.

Hi, Until recently I was using the knncat classifier function of knncat on an old computer (2.12, Mac OS X 10.4), and everything worked great. However, now that I have updated to R 2.14.1 (on Mac OS X 10.7), knncat seems broken. Problems: 1. It seems to output verbose output by default, and regardless of whether I put 0 or 1 into the verbose option. 2. It seems to just predict

Hello, I was building a R addin for Excel. I was able to build R.dll, export to Rdll.lib and wrap it in a Excel addin (.xll) format. Most basic functions work fine within Excel except functions that use LAPACK, e.g. eigen, solve etc. But if you use solve(..., LINPACK = T). That's fine. So apparently the problem is with loading the shared library ../modules/lapack.dll. I read one of the

> On 10 Feb 2017, at 14:53, G?ran Brostr?m <goran.brostrom at umu.se> wrote: > > Thanks to all who answered my third question. I learned something, but: > > On 2017-02-09 17:44, Martin Maechler wrote: >> >>>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 16:00, G?ran Brostr?m <goran.brostrom at umu.se> wrote: >>>> >>>> In my package 'glmmML'

Dear developers, I am trying to reproduce the results of applying opt -O3 to a source file in the form of LLVM IR. I want to get the same IR by manually ordering the passes used by O3 and passing them to opt. To illustrate what I am doing on an example, as an input I use linpack benchmark from the LLVM test suite[1]: 1. First I produce the intermediate representation using clang: clang -O3