similar to: looping through tasks

I'm trying to create a new column in my data.frame where subjects are categorized depending on values on four other columns. In any other case I would just nest a few ifelse statements, however, in this case i have 4*6*2*3=144 combinations and i get weird 'context overflow' errors. So I wonder if there is a more efficient way of doing this. For illustrational purposes, let's say

Hello, I?m hoping you have a few minutes to help out someone very new to R. I?ve done some searching, but cannot find this particular issue. I have survey data from two different time periods (years). Both years are stratified samples and have the same variables (and variable names), but are different people in the community answering in the different years. Everything loads into the survey

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> I suspect that the right way to do promotion/renaming of this

Dear all, When porting my package to WinXP I have the following problem: I need to create an environment variable "MYVAR=c:\mypath" which I have saved in the control panel "System->My Computer" (under the `Advanced' tab). I have two files which need to access MYVAR: config.win, Makefile.win While "config.win" does recognize MYVAR correctly,

I still wonder if this would be an issue in _standard_ (not thin) LTO? This test seems to be OK on my (slightly modified) standard LTO flow, but I do wonder for a more general case. Sergei --- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Peter Collingbourne

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > I suspect that the right way to do promotion/renaming of this sort is to > rename at the MC layer just before writing the symbol table to the object > file. > I think that is too late - how would the symbols be distinguished in the LTO case below after the IR is linked but before we renamed the

I encountered an issue with ThinLTO handling of inline assembly, where the inline assembly referenced a constant that was a local variable. The local var was renamed because it was promoted in ThinLTO mode, but the inline assembly copy was not renamed and we ended up with an undef at link time. It looks like this is a general problem with inline assembly and LTO. Wondering if it is a known issue.

Hi, I''ve got a problem when using templates in Puppet. In my node declarations, i set (or not) some special variables to activate (or not) some part of my configuration. When i don''t need the configuration part, i don''t declare the variable. I then use something like this in my templates: ... <% if defined? myvar %> ... myvalue = <%= myvar %> ... <%

Hello I haven't found an example on how to compare the value of a string variable with spaces in it, and the While loop below never exits: ========== extensions.conf exten => start,n,Set(MYVAR="Dummy value") exten => start,n,NoOp(${MYVAR}) ;BAD TOO ;exten => start,n,While(!$[${MYVAR} : "Some string"]) exten => start,n,While($[${MYVAR} != "Some

This is a bit of a nuby question methinks but i''ve had a play/search around and it''s just bugging me now :0) Say I have a conditional statement, testing a variable against a number of values. The first way i did this is like so: if myvar != "" and myvar != 0 and myvar != nil # .. code end This seems a bit messy - is there neater way of doing this? I thought of:

Hello, I have a variable created like ... Set(__myVar=${ARG1}) ... Set(__${myVar}STATUS=) If ARG1 is abcd, variable is abcdSTATUS and should be empty. This is OK. Now I would like to get the value of abcdSTATUS. How to do it? ${${myVar}STATUS}} isn't working, nor ${{myvar}STATUS} Thanks for any hint -- Daniel

I am trying to create a set of vectors which have similar names. They have a common part and an extra unique part. I am sure I have seen questions on this before but I have been unable to find it in the archive. There are examples of sets of names for columns of a data frame, but not for individual vectors. Suppose I want vectors named myvar.1 myvar.2 etc. I tried: >

Just trying out a node agi package (https://github.com/sergey12313/ts-agi/ , and it wasn't behaving as I expected, but when turning on agi debug, it looks like it might be Asterisk (using 17.1.0) This works as expected <Local/1000 at default-00000020;2>AGI Rx << SET VARIABLE myVar "Hello World!!!" <Local/1000 at default-00000020;2>AGI Tx >> 200 result=1

I hope you are doing well. For me, this was an unexpected problem. I've hoped for quite a few wrong things today, but I'm only asking you about this one. Why does ifelse(1, list(a, b, c), list(x, y, z)) return a list with only a, not list(a, b, c) as I hoped. I wish it would either cause an error or return the whole list, not just the first thing. Working example: > x <- 1 >

Greetings: I am unsuccessful in suppressing "Given : myvariable" from a coplot. There was such a question in the past but the thread breaks down. I am sure this is a "for dummies" question :-). I tried: coplot(myvar~myvar | myvar, show.given=FALSE, xlab="....", ylab="...", main=" ") and some other variations (including without main=" ")

For the gep: %idx1 = getelementptr i32* %MyVar, i32 0 i32* is the type that MyVar is pointing to and i32 is the type of the offset value, or what? If it's the type of offset value, then the size of the pointer shouldn't be less than i32, correct? The index is 0, so in this example, the address computation is idx1 = &MyVar+0. What I want to know is the size in bits of the values

Dear all, I would like to point to a minor bug in the documentation of merge(). The documentation (?merge) says all logical; all = L is shorthand for all.x = L and all.y = L. I think the correct description should be all logical; all = T is shorthand for all.x = T and all.y = T. The source file which needs to be fixed is src/library/base/man/merge.Rd To be sure that it hasn't been fixed

Can one create a variable through a function by name createVariable <- function(name) { outputVariable = name name <- NULL } after calling createVariable("myVar") I would like to have a variable myVar initialized with NULL in my environment. Is this possible? Ralf

Hello, I'm currently writing a function pass for LLVM and face the following problem. I want to store the address of a BasicBlock (or the label, as LLVM refers to it) in a local variable (AllocaInst). Later on I intend to indirectly branch to this address by "dereferencing" the variable. Is this possible? I tried creating an instance of AllocaInst but I'm not quite sure which

Here i have a variable MyVar <- data.frame(read.csv("D:\\Doc.csv")) And now i am storing this variable name into a list. MyList <- list() MyList [length(MyList )+1]<- "MyVar" Now what is the requirement is, i need to call the variable name "MyVar" from the list "MyList " and get the data.