Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches similar to: "<no subject>"
1999 Oct 23
3
semaphores and Solaris 7 8/99
I just installed the 8/99 release of Solaris 7 on three Sun Ultra 10's and
it seems to have broken Samba. I am running Samba 2.0.5a and it works fine
on an Ultra 10 running the 5/99 release of Solaris 7. All of the Ultra 10's
are using the 64 bit kernel. This is the errors that I am getting.
[1999/10/22 21:09:56, 0] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(597)
ERROR: root did not create the
1999 Aug 06
2
Solaris 7 5/99 and samba-2.0.5a (PR#19508)
bob@hobbes.dtcc.edu wrote:
>
> this samba was built on a solaris 2.5 system and was running fine on a
> solaris 7 3/99 system. when i installed the solaris 7 5/99 maintenance
> update something broke.
>
> log.smb:
>
> [1999/08/06 11:04:41, 1] smbd/server.c:main(628)
> smbd version 2.0.5a started.
> Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998
> [1999/08/06 11:36:49,
1999 Aug 14
1
HPUX shared memory creates error (PR#19573)
Phillip.Link@alcatel.fr wrote:
> The problem
> -----------
> I've been trying to install the latest samba distrib (2.0.5a) on a hpux
> 10.20 machine, but the connection times out, apparently because of
> shared memory access.
>
> Trying to make an smbclient connection (or using the windows nt explorer
> to connect generates the following log.smb (smbd launched as smbd
2006 Aug 24
9
[slightly offtopic] A small, fast Apache2.2 (if there is such a thing)
Hi.
I''m using Apache2.2 built from source + mod-proxy + ssl + svn.
Everything works fine but I''m sure you I could disable a ton of
modules during the build process and in httpd.conf to speed things up
and run a tighter memory footprint.
Has anyone bothered building Apache2.2 from source disabling all the
unneeded modules.
I am planning on going through the Apache docs but I
2006 Aug 29
28
Stability of Rails
I''ve seen a lot of issue regarding the stability of Rails apps. I''m
charged with investigation of Rails for my company and I''ve looked at
numerous fourms, groups, etc. (Textdrive, here, etc.) and it *seems*
like there is a stability problem with Rails (ie: crashes, etc.) Is
this as common as it looks, or is this tied to things like Lighttpd (web
server) or Typo
2006 Jul 16
6
Apache2.2 + Mongrel: what do you think about these perfs?
Hi all,
I''ve been spending quite a lot of time trying to install a decent RoR
server on my dedicated server (Ubuntu 6.06 LTS), and now, everything
works.
However, the performances are not really what I had expected... I would
like to know what you think about it.
Here is my config: 2GHz VIA proc, 1Gb RAM, SATA-II HD.
I have apt-got ruby 1.8.4, mysql5 and installed rails 1.1.4 by